Margaretha M S Wessels1, Marije Te Lintelo2, Sabine L Vriezinga2, Hein Putter3, Erica G Hopman4, M Luisa Mearin2. 1. Departments of Pediatrics, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands. Electronic address: m.m.s.wessels@lumc.nl. 2. Departments of Pediatrics, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands. 3. Departments of Statistics, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands. 4. Departments of Dietetics and Nutrition, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Compliance to a gluten free diet (GFD) in celiac disease (CD) is ideally assessed by dietary interviews, albeit time-consuming. Short dietary questionnaires have been developed for adults but not for children. Primary aim was to compare GFD compliance in celiac children, measured by a short dietary questionnaire against a dietary interview. Secondary aims were correlation between both questionnaires and celiac antibodies and identifying variables predicting noncompliance. METHODS: Between 2012 and 2014, participants in the E-health CoelKids study, completed a short dietary questionnaire and standardized dietary interview together with measurement of anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies (TG2A). Results of the questionnaires were assigned under similar categories. Factors possibly influencing dietary compliance were recorded. Where appropriate, Pearson's Chi-square test for trend, unpaired t-test, Cohen's kappa and one-way ANOVA were used. RESULTS: 151 of 165 participating patients were studied, 66% were female. Mean age was 11.3 years (2-26, SD 5.4), mean age at CD diagnosis was 4.9 years (1-23, SD 4.0). The short questionnaire and dietary interview correlated poorly, detecting problems in dietary adherence in 14% and 52% of the patients, respectively (Cohen's kappa 0.034). Only the short questionnaire correlated with TG2A (p = 0.003). Only older age was associated with noncompliance, the mean age of completely nonadherent, adherent but committing errors, and strictly adherent patients were 15.5, 11.5 and 10.1 years, respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to the dietary interview, short dietary questionnaires and TG2A serology failed to detect dietary transgressions in CD children, wherein adolescents were shown to be at highest risk.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Compliance to a gluten free diet (GFD) in celiac disease (CD) is ideally assessed by dietary interviews, albeit time-consuming. Short dietary questionnaires have been developed for adults but not for children. Primary aim was to compare GFD compliance in celiac children, measured by a short dietary questionnaire against a dietary interview. Secondary aims were correlation between both questionnaires and celiac antibodies and identifying variables predicting noncompliance. METHODS: Between 2012 and 2014, participants in the E-health CoelKids study, completed a short dietary questionnaire and standardized dietary interview together with measurement of anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies (TG2A). Results of the questionnaires were assigned under similar categories. Factors possibly influencing dietary compliance were recorded. Where appropriate, Pearson's Chi-square test for trend, unpaired t-test, Cohen's kappa and one-way ANOVA were used. RESULTS: 151 of 165 participating patients were studied, 66% were female. Mean age was 11.3 years (2-26, SD 5.4), mean age at CD diagnosis was 4.9 years (1-23, SD 4.0). The short questionnaire and dietary interview correlated poorly, detecting problems in dietary adherence in 14% and 52% of the patients, respectively (Cohen's kappa 0.034). Only the short questionnaire correlated with TG2A (p = 0.003). Only older age was associated with noncompliance, the mean age of completely nonadherent, adherent but committing errors, and strictly adherent patients were 15.5, 11.5 and 10.1 years, respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to the dietary interview, short dietary questionnaires and TG2A serology failed to detect dietary transgressions in CDchildren, wherein adolescents were shown to be at highest risk.
Authors: Amporn Atsawarungruangkit; Jocelyn A Silvester; Dayna Weiten; Kathy L Green; Kaitlyn E Wilkey; Lisa N Rigaux; Charles N Bernstein; Lesley A Graff; John R Walker; Donald R Duerksen Journal: Nutrition Date: 2020-03-20 Impact factor: 4.008