Literature DB >> 28499344

The Responsiveness and Minimal Important Change of the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index and Oxford Shoulder Instability Score.

Just A van der Linde, Derk A van Kampen, Loes W A H van Beers, Derek F P van Deurzen, Daniël B F Saris, Caroline B Terwee.   

Abstract

Study Design Prospective cohort study. Background Patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs) are widely used to evaluate functional limitations. Considering PROMs for shoulder instability, information is lacking with regard to what constitutes a relevant change from baseline scores. Objectives To evaluate the responsiveness of the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) and the Oxford Shoulder Instability Score (OSIS) and estimate their minimal important change (MIC). Methods One hundred five consecutive patients with shoulder instability completed 5 PROMs at baseline and at 6-month follow-up. The PROMs included the WOSI and OSIS, the Simple Shoulder Test, the Oxford Shoulder Score, and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand assessment. Patients also rated their functional change on an anchor question at follow-up. Responsiveness was evaluated by testing 9 hypotheses regarding predefined correlations between the changes in PROM scores, by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and by calculating the standardized response mean and effect size statistics. The MIC was determined by identifying the optimal cutoff on the receiver operating characteristic curve. Results Seven out of 9 hypotheses (78%) were confirmed; as expected, a high correlation (0.77) was found between change scores of the WOSI and OSIS, whereas the correlations of the change scores of the WOSI and OSIS with those of general shoulder PROMs were slightly lower (0.61-0.75). The area under the curve was 0.83 (95% confidence interval: 0.75, 0.91) for the OSIS and 0.82 (95% confidence interval: 0.74, 0.90) for the WOSI. The MIC was about 6 points for the OSIS and about 14 points for the WOSI. Conclusion Both the WOSI and OSIS are able to measure change in shoulder function in patients with shoulder instability. The estimated MIC is 6 points for the OSIS (on a scale from 0 to 48) and 14 points for the WOSI (on a scale from 0 to 100). J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2017;47(6):402-410. doi:10.2519/jospt.2017.6548.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinimetrics; functional outcome measures; outcome assessment; shoulder

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28499344     DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2017.6548

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 0190-6011            Impact factor:   4.751


  12 in total

Review 1.  Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Substantial Clinical Benefit, and Patient Acceptable Symptom State of Outcome Measures Relating to Shoulder Pathology and Surgery: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Favian Su; Sachin Allahabadi; Dale N Bongbong; Brian T Feeley; Drew A Lansdown
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2021-01-12

2.  Conservative management following closed reduction of traumatic anterior dislocation of the shoulder.

Authors:  Cordula Braun; Cliona J McRobert
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-05-10

3.  Heavy shoulder strengthening exercise in people with hypermobility spectrum disorder (HSD) and long-lasting shoulder symptoms: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Behnam Liaghat; Søren T Skou; Uffe Jørgensen; Jens Sondergaard; Karen Søgaard; Birgit Juul-Kristensen
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2020-07-10

Review 4.  Maximal Medical Improvement Following Shoulder Stabilization Surgery May Require up to 1 Year: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Bhavik H Patel; Yining Lu; Avinesh Agarwalla; Richard N Puzzitiello; Benedict U Nwachukwu; Gregory L Cvetanovich; Jorge Chahla; Brian Forsythe
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2020-09-10

5.  Return to Play and Performance Perceptions of Baseball Players After Isolated SLAP Tear Repair.

Authors:  Lonnie Douglas; John Whitaker; John Nyland; Patrick Smith; Filippo Chillemi; Roger Ostrander; James Andrews
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-03-07

6.  A randomised controlled trial of heavy shoulder strengthening exercise in patients with hypermobility spectrum disorder or hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome and long-lasting shoulder complaints: study protocol for the Shoulder-MOBILEX study.

Authors:  Behnam Liaghat; Søren T Skou; Jens Søndergaard; Eleanor Boyle; Karen Søgaard; Birgit Juul-Kristensen
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Two-year results of arthroscopic conjoint tendon transfer procedure for the management of failed anterior stabilization of the shoulder.

Authors:  Vishal Patel; Eyiyemi Pearse; Magnus Arnander; Duncan Tennent
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2021-02-24

Review 8.  How to Assess Shoulder Functionality: A Systematic Review of Existing Validated Outcome Measures.

Authors:  Rocio Aldon-Villegas; Carmen Ridao-Fernández; Dolores Torres-Enamorado; Gema Chamorro-Moriana
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-08

9.  Responsiveness of quality-of-life measures in patients with peripheral vascular malformations: the OVAMA project.

Authors:  M M Lokhorst; S E R Horbach; M Waner; T M O; C J M van der Vleuten; L B Mokkink; C M A M van der Horst; P I Spuls
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 9.302

10.  Neuromuscular Exercises Improve Shoulder Function More Than Standard Care Exercises in Patients With a Traumatic Anterior Shoulder Dislocation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Henrik Rode Eshoj; Sten Rasmussen; Lars Henrik Frich; Inge Hvass; Robin Christensen; Eleanor Boyle; Steen Lund Jensen; Jens Søndergaard; Karen Søgaard; Birgit Juul-Kristensen
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-01-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.