Literature DB >> 28499343

Knee Loading Deficits During Dynamic Tasks in Individuals Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Kristamarie A Pratt, Susan M Sigward.   

Abstract

Study Design Controlled laboratory study, cross-sectional. Background Well-documented deficits in sagittal plane knee loading during dynamic tasks indicate that individuals limit the magnitude of knee loading following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). It is unknown how these individuals modulate the speed of knee flexion during loading, which is particularly important as they progress to running during rehabilitation. Objective To investigate how individuals following ACLR perform dynamic knee loading tasks compared to healthy controls. Methods Two groups of recreationally active individuals participated: 15 healthy controls and 15 individuals post-ACLR (ACLR group). Participants performed 3 trials of overground running and a single-limb loading (SLL) task. Sagittal plane range of motion, peak knee extensor moment, peak knee flexion angular velocity, peak knee power absorption, and rate of knee extensor moment were calculated during deceleration. A mixed-factor multivariate analysis of variance was performed to compare differences in variables between groups (ACLR and control), limbs (within ACLR), and tasks (within control). Results Knee power absorption, knee flexion angular velocity, and rate of knee extensor moment were lower in reconstructed limbs (for the SLL task: 5.6 W/kg, 325.8°/s, and 10.5 Nm/kg/s, respectively; for running: 11.8 W/kg, 421.4°/s, and 38.2 Nm/kg/s, respectively) compared to nonsurgical limbs (for the SLL task: 9.7 W/kg, 432.0°/s, and 19.1 Nm/kg/s, respectively; for running: 18.8 W/kg, 494.1°/s, and 72.8 Nm/kg/s, respectively) during both tasks (P<.001). The magnitudes of between-limb differences in knee flexion angular velocity were similar in both tasks. Conclusion Despite lower loading demands during SLL, individuals post-ACLR exhibit deficits in knee dynamics during SLL and running, suggesting an inability or reluctance to dynamically accommodate forces at the knee when progressing to running in rehabilitation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2017;47(6):411-419. doi:10.2519/jospt.2017.6912.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; kinetics; knee; rehabilitation; running

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28499343     DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2017.6912

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 0190-6011            Impact factor:   4.751


  5 in total

1.  Running Biomechanics in Individuals with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Benoit Pairot-de-Fontenay; Richard W Willy; Audrey R C Elias; Ryan L Mizner; Marc-Olivier Dubé; Jean-Sébastien Roy
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  INFLUENCE OF ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION ON DYNAMIC POSTURAL CONTROL.

Authors:  Becky Heinert; Kari Willett; Thomas W Kernozek
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2018-06

3.  Inertial Sensor Angular Velocities Reflect Dynamic Knee Loading during Single Limb Loading in Individuals Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Kristamarie A Pratt; Susan M Sigward
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  Recommendations for Plyometric Training after ACL Reconstruction - A Clinical Commentary.

Authors:  Matthew Buckthorpe; Francesco Della Villa
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2021-06-01

5.  Energy Absorption Contribution and Strength in Female Athletes at Return to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Comparison With Healthy Controls.

Authors:  Marie E Boo; J Craig Garrison; Joseph P Hannon; Kalyssa M Creed; Shiho Goto; Angellyn N Grondin; James M Bothwell
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2018-03-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.