Egon Dejonckheere1, Brock Bastian2, Eiko I Fried3, Sean C Murphy2, Peter Kuppens1. 1. Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. 2. Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 3. Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Western societies often overemphasize the pursuit of happiness, and regard negative feelings such as sadness or anxiety as maladaptive and unwanted. Despite this emphasis on happiness, the amount of people suffering from depressive complaints is remarkably high. To explain this apparent paradox, we examined whether experiencing social pressure not to feel sad or anxious could in fact contribute to depressive symptoms. METHODS: A sample of individuals (n = 112) with elevated depression scores (Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-9] ≥ 10) took part in an online daily diary study in which they rated their depressive symptoms and perceived social pressure not to feel depressed or anxious for 30 consecutive days. Using multilevel VAR models, we investigated the temporal relation between this perceived social pressure and depressive symptoms to determine directionality. RESULTS: Primary analyses consistently indicated that experiencing social pressure predicts increases in both overall severity scores and most individual symptoms of depression, but not vice versa. A set of secondary analyses, in which we adopted a network perspective on depression, confirmed these findings. Using this approach, centrality analysis revealed that perceived social pressure not to feel negative plays an instigating role in depression, reflected by the high out- and low instrength centrality of this pressure in the various depression networks. CONCLUSIONS: Together, these findings indicate how perceived societal norms may contribute to depression, hinting at a possible malignant consequence of society's denouncement of negative emotions. Clinical implications are discussed.
BACKGROUND: Western societies often overemphasize the pursuit of happiness, and regard negative feelings such as sadness or anxiety as maladaptive and unwanted. Despite this emphasis on happiness, the amount of people suffering from depressive complaints is remarkably high. To explain this apparent paradox, we examined whether experiencing social pressure not to feel sad or anxious could in fact contribute to depressive symptoms. METHODS: A sample of individuals (n = 112) with elevated depression scores (Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-9] ≥ 10) took part in an online daily diary study in which they rated their depressive symptoms and perceived social pressure not to feel depressed or anxious for 30 consecutive days. Using multilevel VAR models, we investigated the temporal relation between this perceived social pressure and depressive symptoms to determine directionality. RESULTS: Primary analyses consistently indicated that experiencing social pressure predicts increases in both overall severity scores and most individual symptoms of depression, but not vice versa. A set of secondary analyses, in which we adopted a network perspective on depression, confirmed these findings. Using this approach, centrality analysis revealed that perceived social pressure not to feel negative plays an instigating role in depression, reflected by the high out- and low instrength centrality of this pressure in the various depression networks. CONCLUSIONS: Together, these findings indicate how perceived societal norms may contribute to depression, hinting at a possible malignant consequence of society's denouncement of negative emotions. Clinical implications are discussed.
Authors: Egon Dejonckheere; Merijn Mestdagh; Marlies Houben; Isa Rutten; Laura Sels; Peter Kuppens; Francis Tuerlinckx Journal: Nat Hum Behav Date: 2019-04-15
Authors: Elise K Kalokerinos; Sean C Murphy; Peter Koval; Natasha H Bailen; Geert Crombez; Tom Hollenstein; John Gleeson; Renee J Thompson; Dimitri M L Van Ryckeghem; Peter Kuppens; Brock Bastian Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2020-04-15 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Egon Dejonckheere; Joshua J Rhee; Peter K Baguma; Oumar Barry; Maja Becker; Michał Bilewicz; Thomas Castelain; Giulio Costantini; Girts Dimdins; Agustín Espinosa; Gillian Finchilescu; Malte Friese; Maria Cecilia Gastardo-Conaco; Angel Gómez; Roberto González; Nobuhiko Goto; Peter Halama; Camilo Hurtado-Parrado; Gabriela M Jiga-Boy; Johannes A Karl; Lindsay Novak; Liisi Ausmees; Steve Loughnan; Khairul A Mastor; Neil McLatchie; Ike E Onyishi; Muhammad Rizwan; Mark Schaller; Eleonora Serafimovska; Eunkook M Suh; William B Swann; Eddie M W Tong; Ana Torres; Rhiannon N Turner; Alexander Vinogradov; Zhechen Wang; Victoria Wai-Lan Yeung; Catherine E Amiot; Watcharaporn Boonyasiriwat; Müjde Peker; Paul A M Van Lange; Christin-Melanie Vauclair; Peter Kuppens; Brock Bastian Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-02-17 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Michelle Tester-Jones; Mathew P White; Lewis R Elliott; Netta Weinstein; James Grellier; Theo Economou; Gregory N Bratman; Anne Cleary; Mireia Gascon; Kalevi M Korpela; Mark Nieuwenhuijsen; Aisling O'Connor; Ann Ojala; Matilda van den Bosch; Lora E Fleming Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-11-06 Impact factor: 4.379