Literature DB >> 2849881

Detection of human papillomavirus deoxyribonucleic acid in exfoliated cervicovaginal cells as a predictor of cervical neoplasia in a high-risk population.

D B Ritter1, A S Kadish, S H Vermund, S L Romney, D Villari, R D Burk.   

Abstract

Specific types of human papillomavirus are currently implicated as etiologic agents of precancerous and cancerous lesions of the cervix. We have previously described the use of cervicovaginal lavage and molecular hybridization to detect human papillomavirus infections of the cervix. We report here the predictive value of this method of human papillomavirus detection to identify women with biopsy proved dysplastic and cancerous lesions of the cervix. One hundred ninety-one women from a city hospital colposcopy clinic underwent concurrent Papanicolaou smear, cervicovaginal lavage, and coloposcopically directed cervical biopsy. Human papillomavirus deoxyribonucleic acid was detected in 114 (59.7%) of these women. Of the positive results, human papillomavirus type 16 accounted for 23.7%, human papillomavirus type 18 for 10.5%, human papillomavirus type six or 11 for 6.2%, related human papillomavirus types for 52.6%, and 7.0% contained more than one type. The distribution of human papillomavirus types was similar in both women younger than 40 years of age and in older women. Eighty-nine of 128 (69.5%) women less than 40 years old with cervical lesions had positive findings of human papillomavirus, and 18 of 29 (62.1%) older women with cervical lesions had positive findings of human papillomavirus. Detection of human papillomavirus types 16 and 18 identified only 35 of 157 (22.3%) women with cervical lesions. The sensitivity of detecting all types of human papillomavirus as a predictor of a biopsy proved lesion (68.0%) was comparable with the sensitivity of cytologic examination alone (74.0%). However, human papillomavirus detection combined with the Papanicolaou smear provided an increased overall sensitivity of 89.3% (p less than 0.01). In fact, women either positive for human papillomavirus or having abnormal cytologic findings were 11.8 times more likely to have a biopsy proved cervical lesion than human papillomavirus-negative women with negative cytologic results (95% confidence interval for odds ratio: 5.3 to 26.6). We conclude that the sensitivity of cytologic examination plus human papillomavirus detection is superior to the use of either cytologic studies or human papillomavirus detection alone in identifying patients with cervical lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2849881     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(88)90587-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  10 in total

1.  Detection of human papillomavirus deoxyribonucleic acid in the female genital tract.

Authors:  J Czeglédy; L Gergely; Z Hernádi; R Póka
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Comparison of the hybrid capture tube test and PCR for detection of human papillomavirus DNA in cervical specimens.

Authors:  J U Cope; A Hildesheim; M H Schiffman; M M Manos; A T Lörincz; R D Burk; A G Glass; C Greer; J Buckland; K Helgesen; D R Scott; M E Sherman; R J Kurman; K L Liaw
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Prevalence of low and high risk human papillomavirus types in cervical cells from Hong Kong pregnant Chinese using filter in situ hybridization.

Authors:  E W Ip; R J Collins; A N Cheung; G Srivastava
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.344

4.  Use of AffiProbe HPV test kit for detection of human papillomavirus DNA in genital scrapes.

Authors:  M Ranki; A W Leinonen; T Jalava; P Nieminen; V R Soares; J Paavonen; A Kallio
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Low false-negative rate of PCR analysis for detecting human papillomavirus-related cervical lesions.

Authors:  P Zazove; B D Reed; L Gregoire; A Ferenczy; D W Gorenflo; W D Lancaster
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Comparative analysis of human papillomavirus detection by dot blot hybridisation and non-isotopic in situ hybridisation.

Authors:  G Troncone; S M Anderson; C S Herrington; M L de Angelis; H Noell; J A Chimera; J O'D McGee
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 7.  Pathobiology of papillomavirus-related cervical diseases: prospects for immunodiagnosis.

Authors:  C P Crum; S Barber; J K Roche
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 26.132

8.  Periodic health examination, 1995 update: 1. Screening for human papillomavirus infection in asymptomatic women. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination.

Authors:  K Johnson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1995-02-15       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Seroreactivity to HPV-16 proteins in women with early cervical neoplasia.

Authors:  S R Barber; J Werdel; M Symbula; J Williams; B A Burkett; P T Taylor; J K Roche; C P Crum
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 6.968

10.  Detection of human papillomavirus type 16 in sexual partners of patients having cervical cancer by polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  A Nakazawa; M Inoue; M Fujita; O Tanizawa; A Hakura
Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res       Date:  1991-11
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.