Literature DB >> 28498280

Immunohistochemical Characterization of the Origins of Metastatic Well-differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumors to the Liver.

Zhaohai Yang1, David S Klimstra, Ralph H Hruban, Laura H Tang.   

Abstract

Metastatic neoplasms of unknown primary site pose a major challenge to patient management. As targeted therapies are now being tailored to neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of different primary sites, identifying the origin of metastatic NETs has become increasingly important. Compared with more extensive efforts on metastatic adenocarcinomas of unknown primary, the literature on metastatic NETs (often to the liver) is relatively sparse and most studies are based on primary tumors. We sought to study metastatic well-differentiated NETs to the liver to identify markers that predict the site of origin. Eighty-five metastatic NETs to the liver were retrieved from the pathology archive. The primary sites were determined based on either pathologic review of the primary tumors (in most cases) or radiologic/clinical findings. Immunohistochemical labeling for TTF1, CDX2, ISL1, NKX2.2, and PDX1 was performed on either tissue microarrays or whole sections. The primary sites of the NETs in the study cohort included: pancreas (35%), small intestine (32%), rectum (8%), stomach (2%), bile duct (1%), lung (9%), and unknown primary (12%). We found predominant expression of TTF1 in lung carcinoid (63%), CDX2 in small intestinal (89%) and ISL1 in pancreatic NETs (77%), respectively. NKX2.2 was mainly expressed in NETs of the digestive organs. PDX1 was detected in a small percentage of pancreatic, small intestinal and the single bile duct NET. There was no statistically significant association between tumor grade (World Health Organization G1 vs. G2) and the expression of any of the above markers. The 3-marker panel (TTF1, CDX2, and ISL1) had sensitivities of 81%, 89%, and 63%, specificities of 100%, 94%, and 100%, positive predictive values of 100%, 89%, and 100%, and negative predictive values of 84%, 94%, and 96% in separating metastatic NETs into 3 major primary sites: pancreas/rectum, small intestine, and lung, respectively, with an overall accuracy of 82%. Furthermore, this panel predicted a primary site for 6 of the 10 NETs of unknown primary, which reduced the NETs of unknown primary from 12% to 5%. Thus, through immunohistochemical study of a large series of metastatic NETs to the liver, we have demonstrated the utility of a 3-marker panel for the identification of one or more potential primary sites of most metastatic NETs, which could provide practical guidance in patient management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28498280     DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000876

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  10 in total

Review 1.  Classification of pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors: new insights.

Authors:  Giuseppe Pelosi; Angelica Sonzogni; Sergio Harari; Adriana Albini; Enrica Bresaola; Caterina Marchiò; Federica Massa; Luisella Righi; Gaia Gatti; Nikolaos Papanikolaou; Namrata Vijayvergia; Fiorella Calabrese; Mauro Papotti
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2017-10

Review 2.  A Clinicopathologic and Molecular Update of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms With a Focus on the New World Health Organization Classification.

Authors:  Jiayun M Fang; Jiaqi Shi
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 5.534

Review 3.  Management of neuroendocrine tumors of unknown primary.

Authors:  Krystallenia Alexandraki; Anna Angelousi; Georgios Boutzios; Georgios Kyriakopoulos; Dimitra Rontogianni; Gregory Kaltsas
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 6.514

4.  Pathology Reporting in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of the Digestive System: Everything You Always Wanted to Know but Were Too Afraid to Ask.

Authors:  Manuela Albertelli; Federica Grillo; Fabio Lo Calzo; Giulia Puliani; Carmen Rainone; Annamaria Anita Livia Colao; Antongiulio Faggiano
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 5.555

Review 5.  An update on the development of concepts, diagnostic criteria, and challenging issues for neuroendocrine neoplasms across different digestive organs.

Authors:  Anne Couvelard; Jérôme Cros
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2022-03-12       Impact factor: 4.064

6.  Assessment of ARX expression, a novel biomarker for metastatic risk in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, in endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration.

Authors:  Wenzel M Hackeng; Folkert H M Morsink; Leon M G Moons; Christopher M Heaphy; G Johan A Offerhaus; Koen M A Dreijerink; Lodewijk A A Brosens
Journal:  Diagn Cytopathol       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 1.582

7.  Immunohistochemical Profile and 47-Gene Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) Solid Tumor Panel Analysis of a Series of 13 Strumal Carcinoids.

Authors:  S Theurer; M Ingenwerth; T Herold; K Herrmann; K W Schmid
Journal:  Endocr Pathol       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 3.943

8.  Metachronous double primary neuroendocrine tumors in larynx and lung: a case report.

Authors:  In Hye Song; Youn Soo Lee; Dong-Il Sun; Yong-Kil Hong; Kyo-Young Lee
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 1.671

9.  NKX2.2, PDX-1 and CDX-2 as potential biomarkers to differentiate well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Michelle X Yang; Ryan F Coates; Abiy Ambaye; Valerie Cortright; Jeannette M Mitchell; Alexa M Buskey; Richard Zubarik; James G Liu; Steven Ades; Maura M Barry
Journal:  Biomark Res       Date:  2018-04-18

10.  Combination of laparoscopy and endoscopy as an option for treatment patients with gastric neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  A G Kriger; D S Gorin; A R Kaldarov; S V Berelavichus; L A Marinova; G V Galkin
Journal:  J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2019-01-31
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.