Literature DB >> 28498240

Simple Vaginal Trachelectomy: A Valuable Fertility-Preserving Option in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.

Marie Plante1, Marie-Claude Renaud, Alexandra Sebastianelli, Jean Gregoire.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Radical trachelectomy is a valid alternative for the treatment of early-stage cervical cancer in young women who wish to preserve fertility potential. Recent data indicate that even less radical surgery could be performed in low-risk cases. The objective of our study was to evaluate the safety of simple vaginal trachelectomy and node assessment in patients with low-risk, early-stage cervical cancer (<2 cm).
METHODS: From May 2007 to July 2016, 35 women underwent a simple vaginal trachelectomy with laparoscopic sentinel lymph node mapping + pelvic node dissection. Data were collected prospectively in a computerized database. Descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meier estimate were used for analysis.
RESULTS: Patients' median age was 29 years, and 24 (69%) were nulliparous. Eight had stage IA1 with lymphovascular space invasion, 9 a stage IA2, and 18 a stage IB1. Nineteen (54%) had squamous histology, 13 (37%) had adenocarcinoma, and 3 had other histologic findings. The median operating room time was 148 minutes (90-240 minutes), and median blood loss was 50 mL (25-200 mL). On final pathology, lymph nodes were negative in all patients, except 2 cases with isolated tumor cells. Twenty-two patients (63%) had either no residual disease in the trachelectomy specimen (n = 15) or residual dysplasia only (n = 7). With a median follow-up of 42 months (1-100 months), 1 local recurrence occurred treated initially with chemoradiation and then a pelvic exenteration. The recurrence-free survival at 48 months is 96.7%. There were 25 pregnancies: 5 (20%) ended in the first trimester, 2 delivered prematurely at 34.4 and at 35 weeks, and all the others (18 [72%]) delivered at more than 36 weeks.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on our experience, simple trachelectomy and nodes appear to be a safe fertility-preserving surgery in well-selected patients with small-volume cervical cancer. Obstetric outcome appears favorable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28498240     DOI: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000989

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  10 in total

1.  Staging, recurrence and follow-up of uterine cervical cancer using MRI: Updated Guidelines of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology after revised FIGO staging 2018.

Authors:  Lucia Manganaro; Yulia Lakhman; Nishat Bharwani; Benedetta Gui; Silvia Gigli; Valeria Vinci; Stefania Rizzo; Aki Kido; Teresa Margarida Cunha; Evis Sala; Andrea Rockall; Rosemarie Forstner; Stephanie Nougaret
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Reproductive outcomes following treatment for a gynecological cancer diagnosis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Brigitte Gerstl; Elizabeth Sullivan; Marcus Vallejo; Jana Koch; Maximilian Johnson; Handan Wand; Kate Webber; Angela Ives; Antoinette Anazodo
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 4.442

3.  Fertility-Sparing Treatment for Young Patients with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Dawn of a New Era.

Authors:  Charalampos Theofanakis; Aristotelis-Marios Koulakmanidis; Anastasia Prodromidou; Dimitrios Haidopoulos; Alexandros Rodolakis; Nikolaos Thomakos
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-05-06

4.  Prognostic value of lymphovascular space invasion in patients with early stage cervical cancer in Jilin, China: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Wenxing Yan; Shuang Qiu; Yaming Ding; Qi Zhang; Lihui Si; Sha Lv; Linlin Liu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  Cancer of the cervix uteri: 2021 update.

Authors:  Neerja Bhatla; Daisuke Aoki; Daya Nand Sharma; Rengaswamy Sankaranarayanan
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 4.447

6.  Radical Trachelectomy for the Treatment of Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Evan S Smith; Ashley S Moon; Robin O'Hanlon; Mario M Leitao; Yukio Sonoda; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Jennifer J Mueller
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 7.623

7.  Can simple trachelectomy or conization show comparable survival rate compared with radical trachelectomy in IA1 cervical cancer patients with lymphovascular space invasion who wish to save fertility? A systematic review and guideline recommendation.

Authors:  Seung-Hyuk Shim; Myong Cheol Lim; Hyun Jung Kim; Maria Lee; Eun Ji Nam; Jung Yun Lee; Yoo-Young Lee; Kwang Beom Lee; Jeong Yeol Park; Yun Hwan Kim; Kyung Do Ki; Yong Jung Song; Hyun Hoon Chung; Sunghoon Kim; Jeong-Won Lee; Jae-Weon Kim; Duk-Soo Bae; Jong-Min Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Are patients and physicians willing to accept less-radical procedures for cervical cancer?

Authors:  Kemal Gungorduk; Roman Kocian; Derman Basaran; Taner Turan; Aykut Ozdemir; David Cibula
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 4.401

9.  Pregnancies after vaginal radical trachelectomy (RT) in patients with early invasive uterine cervical cancer: results from a single institute.

Authors:  Shota Shinkai; Shinichi Ishioka; Tasuku Mariya; Yuya Fujibe; Miseon Kim; Masayuki Someya; Tsuyoshi Saito
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-04-25       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Evidence for disseminated tumor cells in lymphatic vessels afferent to sentinel lymph nodes in patients diagnosed with cervical cancer.

Authors:  Shadi Younes; Andreas M Kaufmann; Norman Häfner; Katrin Beer; Lars Jansen; Juliane Sanft; Gita Mall; Susan Koops; Matthias Dürst; Achim Schneider
Journal:  Cancer Rep (Hoboken)       Date:  2021-03-14
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.