Literature DB >> 28497512

Children's intuitive sense of number develops independently of their perception of area, density, length, and time.

Darko Odic1.   

Abstract

Young children can quickly and intuitively represent the number of objects in a visual scene through the Approximate Number System (ANS). The precision of the ANS - indexed as the most difficult ratio of two numbers that children can reliably discriminate - is well known to improve with development: whereas infants require relatively large ratios to discriminate number, children can discriminate finer and finer changes in number between toddlerhood and early adulthood. Which factors drive the developmental improvements in ANS precision? Here, we investigate the influence of four non-numeric dimensions - area, density, line length, and time - on ANS development, exploring the degree to which the ANS develops independently from these other dimensions, from inhibitory control, and from domain-general factors such as attention and working memory that are shared between these tasks. A sample of 185 children between the ages of 2 and 12 years completed five discrimination tasks: approximate number, area, density, length, and time. We report three main findings. First, logistic growth models applied to both accuracy and Weber fractions (w; an index of ANS precision) across age reveal distinct developmental trajectories across the five dimensions: while area and length develop by adolescence, time and density do not develop fully until early adulthood, with ANS precision developing at an intermediate rate. Second, we find that ANS precision develops independently of the other four dimensions, which in turn develop independently of the ANS. Third, we find that ANS precision also develops independently from individual differences in inhibitory control (indexed as the difference in accuracy and w between Congruent and Incongruent ANS trials). Together, these results are the first to provide evidence for domain-specific improvements in ANS precision, and place children's maturing perception of number, space, and time into a broader developmental context.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28497512     DOI: 10.1111/desc.12533

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Sci        ISSN: 1363-755X


  11 in total

1.  An Introduction to the Approximate Number System.

Authors:  Darko Odic; Ariel Starr
Journal:  Child Dev Perspect       Date:  2018-04-10

Review 2.  Number, time, and space are not singularly represented: Evidence against a common magnitude system beyond early childhood.

Authors:  Karina Hamamouche; Sara Cordes
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-06

3.  More than the sum of its parts: Exploring the development of ratio magnitude versus simple magnitude perception.

Authors:  Yunji Park; Alexandria A Viegut; Percival G Matthews
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2020-10-24

4.  The relative salience of numerical and non-numerical dimensions shifts over development: A re-analysis of.

Authors:  Lauren S Aulet; Stella F Lourenco
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2021-01-29

5.  Developmental Changes in ANS Precision Across Grades 1-9: Different Patterns of Accuracy and Reaction Time.

Authors:  Sergey Malykh; Yulia Kuzmina; Tatiana Tikhomirova
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-03-24

6.  Independent adaptation mechanisms for numerosity and size perception provide evidence against a common sense of magnitude.

Authors:  Giovanni Anobile; David C Burr; Marika Iaia; Chiara V Marinelli; Paola Angelelli; Marco Turi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Comparing Numerical Comparison Tasks: A Meta-Analysis of the Variability of the Weber Fraction Relative to the Generation Algorithm.

Authors:  Mathieu Guillaume; Amandine Van Rinsveld
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-09-11

8.  Cognitive Load Affects Numerical and Temporal Judgments in Distinct Ways.

Authors:  Karina Hamamouche; Maura Keefe; Kerry E Jordan; Sara Cordes
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-10-02

9.  Domain-general cognitive functions fully explained growth in nonsymbolic magnitude representation but not in symbolic representation in elementary school children.

Authors:  Yulia Kuzmina; Tatiana Tikhomirova; Irina Lysenkova; Sergey Malykh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Interpreting Degree Semantics.

Authors:  Alexis Wellwood
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-01-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.