Literature DB >> 28497218

To evaluate the efficacy of an acellular Flowable matrix in comparison with a wet dressing for the treatment of patients with diabetic foot ulcers: a randomized clinical trial.

F Campitiello1, M Mancone2, A Della Corte1, R Guerniero1, S Canonico1.   

Abstract

The authors aimed to evaluate the efficacy of an advanced wound matrix (Integra Flowable Wound Matrix, Integra LifeScience Corp, Plainsboro, NJ, USA) for treating wounds with irregular geometries versus a wet dressing in patients with diabetic foot ulcers. Sixty patients with diabetic foot ulcers (Grades 3 Wagner) were included in this randomized clinical trial. The study was conducted in the General Surgery Unit and Geriatric of the Second University of Naples, Italy, in the last 12 months. Forty-six cases of diabetic foot ulcers were equally and randomly divided into control and test groups. The first group treated with Integra Flowable Wound Matrix, while the control group with a wet dressing. Both groups were evaluated once a week for 6 weeks to value the degree of epithelialization and granulation tissue of the wound. The complete healing rate in the whole study population was 69.56% (Integra Flowable Wound Matrix group, 86.95%, control group, 52.17%; p = 0.001). Amputation and rehospitalization rates were higher in the control group compared to the first group, therefore, the difference was statistically significant (p = 0.0019; p = 0.028, respectively). The Integra Flowable Wound Matrix, was significantly superior, compared to the wet dressing, by promoting the complete healing of diabetic foot ulcers. Ease of use, absence of adverse effects, and a facilitated wound healing process are among the properties of the matrix. These characteristics make it appropriate in the management of diabetic foot ulcers. Additional research will shed more light on the promising advantages of this material in healing diabetic foot ulcers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomaterial; Diabetic foot ulcers; Flowable matrix; Tunneling lesions

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28497218     DOI: 10.1007/s13304-017-0461-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Updates Surg        ISSN: 2038-131X


  26 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of antimicrobial agents used for chronic wounds.

Authors:  S M O'Meara; N A Cullum; M Majid; T A Sheldon
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 2.  Cell responses to the mechanochemical microenvironment--implications for regenerative medicine and drug delivery.

Authors:  Florian Rehfeldt; Adam J Engler; Adam Eckhardt; Fariyal Ahmed; Dennis E Discher
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2007-08-14       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 3.  A review of tissue-engineered skin bioconstructs available for skin reconstruction.

Authors:  Rostislav V Shevchenko; Stuart L James; S Elizabeth James
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Negative pressure wound therapy after partial diabetic foot amputation: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  David G Armstrong; Lawrence A Lavery
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005-11-12       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 5.  Update on tissue-engineered biological dressings.

Authors:  M Ehrenreich; Z Ruszczak
Journal:  Tissue Eng       Date:  2006-09

Review 6.  New and experimental approaches to treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: a comprehensive review of emerging treatment strategies.

Authors:  R Eldor; I Raz; A Ben Yehuda; A J M Boulton
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.359

Review 7.  Clinical testing in diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

Authors:  E L Feldman; M J Stevens
Journal:  Can J Neurol Sci       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 2.104

Review 8.  Tissue engineering for cutaneous wounds: selecting the proper time and space for growth factors, cells and the extracellular matrix.

Authors:  L Macri; R A F Clark
Journal:  Skin Pharmacol Physiol       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 3.479

9.  Clinical classification of bioengineered skin use and its correlation with healing of diabetic and venous ulcers.

Authors:  Liliana J Saap; Kevin Donohue; Vincent Falanga
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.398

Review 10.  Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Modulation during Metabolic Diseases and Cancers: Master and Minions.

Authors:  Salvatore Giovanni Vitale; Antonio Simone Laganà; Angela Nigro; Valentina Lucia La Rosa; Paola Rossetti; Agnese Maria Chiara Rapisarda; Sandro La Vignera; Rosita Angela Condorelli; Francesco Corrado; Massimo Buscema; Rosario D'Anna
Journal:  PPAR Res       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 4.964

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Update on management of diabetic foot ulcers.

Authors:  Estelle Everett; Nestoras Mathioudakis
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Complete wound closure following a single topical application of a novel autologous homologous skin construct: first evaluation in an open-label, single-arm feasibility study in diabetic foot ulcers.

Authors:  David G Armstrong; Dennis P Orgill; Robert Galiano; Paul M Glat; Marissa Carter; Charles M Zelen; William W Li
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 3.  The clinical efficacy of collagen dressing on chronic wounds: A meta-analysis of 11 randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Hongxin Shu; Zhiyu Xia; Xuan Qin; Xiaowei Wang; Weihang Lu; Qingyu Luo; Zhenxiong Zhang; Xiaowei Xiong
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-08-31

4.  Skin Substitutes for Adults With Diabetic Foot Ulcers and Venous Leg Ulcers: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2021-06-04

5.  The Efficacy and Safety of Acellular Matrix Therapy for Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Wentao Huang; Yongsong Chen; Nasui Wang; Guoshu Yin; Chiju Wei; Wencan Xu
Journal:  J Diabetes Res       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 4.011

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.