Literature DB >> 2849717

Acyclovir treatment of the chronic fatigue syndrome. Lack of efficacy in a placebo-controlled trial.

S E Straus1, J K Dale, M Tobi, T Lawley, O Preble, R M Blaese, C Hallahan, W Henle.   

Abstract

Twenty-seven adults with a diagnosis of the chronic fatigue syndrome were enrolled in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study of acyclovir therapy. The patients had had debilitating fatigue for an average of 6.8 years, accompanied by persisting antibodies to Epstein-Barr virus early antigens (titers greater than or equal to 1:40) or undetectable levels of antibodies to Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigens (titers less than 1:2) or both. Each course of treatment consisted of intravenous placebo or acyclovir (500 mg per square meter of body-surface area) administered every eight hours for seven days. The same drug was then given orally for 30 days (acyclovir, 800 mg four times daily). There were six-week observation periods before, between, and after the treatments. Three patients had acyclovir-induced nephrotoxicity and were withdrawn from the study. Of the 24 patients who completed the trial, similar numbers improved with acyclovir therapy and with placebo (11 and 10, respectively). Neither acyclovir treatment nor clinical improvement correlated with alterations in laboratory findings, including titers of antibody to Epstein-Barr virus or levels of circulating immune complexes or of leukocyte 2',5'-oligoadenylate synthetase. Subjective improvement correlated with various measures of mood. We conclude that acyclovir, as used in this study, does not ameliorate the chronic fatigue syndrome. We believe that the clinical improvement observed in most patients reflected either spontaneous remission of the syndrome or a placebo effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2849717     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198812293192602

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  37 in total

Review 1.  Chronic fatigue syndrome: probable pathogenesis and possible treatments.

Authors:  Birgitta Evengård; Nancy Klimas
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Interventions for the treatment and management of chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis.

Authors:  A M Bagnall; P Whiting; R Richardson; A J Sowden
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2002-09

Review 3.  The chronic fatigue syndrome.

Authors:  D G James; M G Brook; B A Bannister
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 4.  The chronic fatigue syndrome: a return to common sense.

Authors:  A M Denman
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 2.401

5.  Chronic fatigue syndrome: does it need more healthcare resources?

Authors:  A Lloyd; H Pender
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 6.  Infection and infectious diseases.

Authors:  P D Welsby
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 2.401

7.  The trouble with chronic fatigue.

Authors:  R A Aronowitz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1991 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 8.  Chronic fatigue syndrome.

Authors:  J B Wright; D W Beverley
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 9.  Chronic fatigue syndrome. A fresh look at an old problem.

Authors:  J McSherry
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 10.  Chronic fatigue syndrome.

Authors:  Steven F Reid; Trudie Chalder; Anthony Cleare; Matthew Hotopf; Simon Wessely
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2008-08-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.