| Literature DB >> 28497047 |
Li Cui1, Tingting Zhao1, Haibing Hu1, Wen Zhang2, Xiuguo Hua1.
Abstract
Objectives. We aimed to explore the impact of gut microbiota in coronary heart disease (CHD) patients through high-throughput sequencing. Methods. A total of 29 CHD in-hospital patients and 35 healthy volunteers as controls were included. Nucleic acids were extracted from fecal samples, followed by α diversity and principal coordinate analysis (PCoA). Based on unweighted UniFrac distance matrices, unweighted-pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) trees were created. Results. After data optimization, an average of 121312 ± 19293 reads in CHD patients and 234372 ± 108725 reads in controls was obtained. Reads corresponding to 38 phyla, 90 classes, and 584 genera were detected in CHD patients, whereas 40 phyla, 99 classes, and 775 genera were detected in controls. The proportion of phylum Bacteroidetes (56.12%) was lower and that of phylum Firmicutes was higher (37.06%) in CHD patients than those in the controls (60.92% and 32.06%, P < 0.05). PCoA and UPGMA tree analysis showed that there were significant differences of gut microbial compositions between the two groups. Conclusion. The diversity and compositions of gut flora were different between CHD patients and healthy controls. The incidence of CHD might be associated with the alteration of gut microbiota.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28497047 PMCID: PMC5401719 DOI: 10.1155/2017/3796359
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Baseline characteristics of CHD patients and controls.
| Variable | CHD patients ( | Controls ( |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 68.27 ± 9.54 | 66.14 ± 11.41 |
| Sex (male, %) | 15 (51.72) | 18 (51.43) |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.54 ± 3.69 | 23.70 ± 2.60 |
| Hypertension (%) | 86.21 | 85.71 |
Mean values (standard deviation) and % (n) represented for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. CHD: coronary heart disease; BMI: body mass index.
Statistics of pass point data and sequence.
| Group | Sample number | Average number of reads | Percentage of HQ bases | N bases% | Number of Sequences | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average | Max | Min | Average | Max | Min | ||||
| CHD | 29 | 305910 ± 59807 | 68.05 ± 4.06 | 71.37 | 60.66 | 11.2 | 121312 ± 19293 | 153195 | 83869 |
| Control | 35 | 234372 ± 108725 | 87.00 ± 0.72 | 88.88 | 85.85 | 0.7 | 98635 ± 45251 | 341591 | 64408 |
CHD: coronary heart disease; HQ bases: high-quality bases with Q > 30; N bases: unsure bases.
Figure 1Venn picture (a) and rank-abundance curve (b) of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) in the two groups. The rank-abundance curve was smooth, indicting high evenness among samples. D: CHD patients; C: healthy controls.
Figure 2Distribution of relative abundance of top 20 at the phylum level. Each color represents each species. The height of the column represents the abundance of reads. D: CHD patients; C: healthy controls.
Analysis of α diversity index between CHD patients and healthy people.
| Index | CHD group | Control group |
|---|---|---|
| Shannon | 7.68 ± 0.81 | 6.64 ± 0.75 |
| Chao 1 | 89879.74 ± 27715.57 | 17797.86 ± 12344.43 |
| Ace | 91473.99 ± 29246.2 | 17964.38 ± 12558.14 |
| Good's Coverage | 0.90 ± 0.02 | 0.96 ± 0.01 |
P< 0.01 compared with the control group.
Figure 3The intestinal flora distribution of total sample on phylum classification in CHD patients and healthy controls.
Figure 4Distribution of species abundance of 64 samples in the phylum (a) and genus (b) classification. Each color respects one species. The height of the columns represents the abundance of reads. D: CHD patients; C: healthy controls.
Figure 5Unweighted UniFrac principal coordinate analysis of fecal microbiota from 64 subjects. Unweighted UniFrac separates the CHD patients (blue) and control microbiota (red).
Figure 6Unweighted-pair group method with arithmetic mean tree of all subjects. D: CHD patients; C: healthy controls.