Literature DB >> 28497023

The waterfall effect in breast augmentation.

James Frame1.   

Abstract

The 'waterfall effect' is a descriptive term to indicate a sliding ptosis of parenchymal breast tissue over a fixed or encapsulated implant. It occurs more frequently than surgeons anticipate and especially over the longer term after augmentation. Certain breast implants are more prone to contribute to this problem as are implants placed in submuscular pockets that ride high, especially in women with anatomical musculoskeletal variance or asymmetry. This article describes the aetiology of sliding ptosis in more detail, the relevant anatomy and the surgical correction. Understanding the problem enables the surgeon to plan the appropriate procedure and obtain proper informed consent. It is possible that a two stage procedure is necessary should the upper pole of breast require a debulk, either early (3 to 12 months) or later as the breast may slide with ageing of the tissues. The waterfall effect of breast parenchyma over implants is only apparent when the upper torso of the woman is undressed and she is in an erect posture. A significant number of women are happy with this situation and therefore no further action is required. Those that want an improved appearance in these circumstances can try autologous fat transfer to rebulk the surrounding tissues but generally the most likely solution involves a mastopexy with or without implant exchange. The results are highly rewarding but the scars are the legacy. Mastopexy augmentation is a difficult procedure and should only be performed by experienced surgeons. Many surgeons prefer a two stage approach with either an implant based augmentation first to limit scars and see if the patient is happy with the outcome or a first stage mastopexy to decide whether implants or fat graft are actually required as a secondary procedure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast mastopexy; breast implants; breast parenchyma; breast ptosis; pectoralis major muscle; polyurethane breast implants; silicone

Year:  2017        PMID: 28497023      PMCID: PMC5409900          DOI: 10.21037/gs.2016.10.01

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gland Surg        ISSN: 2227-684X


  10 in total

1.  Breast augmentation with anatomical cohesive gel implants: the world's largest current experience.

Authors:  P Hedén; J Jernbeck; M Hober
Journal:  Clin Plast Surg       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.017

Review 2.  Lymphomas Associated with Breast Implants: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Asha Rupani; James D Frame; Dia Kamel
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.283

3.  Framing the Breast.

Authors:  James D Frame; Cara Connolly
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 4.283

4.  A new type of breast prosthesis. Preliminary report.

Authors:  F L Ashley
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1970-05       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Conical polyurethane implants: an uplifting augmentation.

Authors:  Garrick A Georgeu; James D Frame; James D Frame
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 4.283

6.  Dual plane breast augmentation: optimizing implant-soft-tissue relationships in a wide range of breast types.

Authors:  J B Tebbetts
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2001-04-15       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Polyurethane-coated breast implants revisited: a 30-year follow-up.

Authors:  Nikki Castel; Taylor Soon-Sutton; Peter Deptula; Anna Flaherty; Fereydoun Don Parsa
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2015-03-16

8.  Ten-year review of a prospective randomized controlled trial of textured versus smooth subglandular silicone gel breast implants.

Authors:  N Collis; D Coleman; I T Foo; D T Sharpe
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  The In Vivo Pericapsular Tissue Response to Modern Polyurethane Breast Implants.

Authors:  James Frame; Dia Kamel; Marcelo Olivan; Henrique Cintra
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 2.326

10.  Improving the longevity and results of mastopexy and breast reduction procedures: reconstructing an internal breast support system with biocompatible mesh to replace the supporting function of the ligamentous suspension.

Authors:  Petrus V van Deventer; Frank R Graewe; Elisabeth Würinger
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2011-11-20       Impact factor: 2.326

  10 in total
  5 in total

Review 1.  The history and development of breast implants.

Authors:  D Perry; J D Frame
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Polydioxanone Internal Support Matrix: A Rationale for Prophylactic Internal Bra Support in Breast Augmentation.

Authors:  Julia A Chiemi; S Sean Kelishadi
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J Open Forum       Date:  2022-03-30

Review 3.  Revision Breast Augmentation.

Authors:  Brad D Denney; Alvin B Cohn; Jeremy W Bosworth; Pallavi A Kumbla
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 2.314

4.  The Posterior Arm Flap for Reshaping the Postbariatric Breast.

Authors:  Vincenzo Vindigni; Paolo Marchica; Andrea Pagani; Franco Bassetto; Tito Brambullo
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-09-10

Review 5.  Hepatobiliary complications from ruptured silicone breast implants - a comprehensive literature review.

Authors:  Joshua Agilinko; Dharshanan Raj; Ken Vin Wong; Daniele Fanelli; Nicklaus Ng; Bertrand Agilinko; Mohammad Hasan
Journal:  Ger Med Sci       Date:  2021-05-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.