| Literature DB >> 28496942 |
Faegheh Behboudi Farahbakhsh1, Ehsan Nazemalhosseini Mojarad2, Pedram Azimzadeh2, Faezeh Goudarzi1, Amir Houshang Mohammad Alizadeh2, Mehrdad Haghazali3, Reza Mahmoudi Lamoki4, Hamid Asadzadeh Aghdaei2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ninety percent of pancreatic cancer patients have less than 5-year overall survival and approximately 50% of cases were diagnosed with metastasis in the time of admission. Previous evidences have demonstrated the strong association between TGF-β1 variations and cancer susceptibility so far.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28496942 PMCID: PMC5346819
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench ISSN: 2008-2258
Information for TGFβ1 SNPs rs1800471 and rs1800469 that included in this study
| SNPs | Location | Primer Sequence | PCR Product Size | Restriction Enzyme | RFLP Fragment Size |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs1800471 | (G/C) | Forward Primer | 524bp | BglI | G: 252+212+60 |
| rs1800469 | (C/T) | Forward Primer | 153bp | Eco81I | T: 153 |
Demographic characteristics of the study population
| Variables | Controls (n=94) | Cases (n=78) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (Mean ± SD) | 40.12 ± 16.001 | 64.50 ± 13.718 | <0.001 |
| Gender, n (%)b | |||
| Male | 49 (52.1) | 46 (59.0) | 0.369 |
| Female | 45 (47.9) | 32 (41.0) |
According to The chi-square test results.
A comparison of pancreatic cancer patients and healthy control samples of allele and genotype distribution of two SNPs included in this study
| SNP | Variable | Male | Female | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Case | Adjusted | Control | Case | Adjusted | ||
| rs1800469 (-509) | |||||||
| Genotypes n (%) | |||||||
| TT | 16 (32.7) | 12 (26.1) | 1.00 (Reference) | 15 (33.3) | 7 (21.9) | 1.00 (Reference) | |
| CT | 26 (53.1) | 24 (52.2) | 0.838 (0.247-2.842) 0.777 | 21 (46.7) | 21 (65.6) | 4.043 (0.847-19.286) 0.080 | |
| CC | 7 (14.3) | 10 (21.7) | 1.485 (0.296-7.455) 0.631 | 9 (20.0) | 4 (12.5) | 0.682 (0.110- 4.220) 0.680 | |
| Alleles | |||||||
| T | 92 (93.9) | 89 (96.7) | 1.00 (Reference) | 86 (95.6) | 60 (93.8) | 1.00 (Reference) | |
| C | 6 (6.1) | 3 (3.3) | 1.145 (0.538-2.437) 0.726 | 4 (4.4) | 4 (6.3) | 0.927 (0.404-2.126) 0.858 | |
| rs1800471 (+915) | |||||||
| Genotypes n (%) | |||||||
| GG | 43 (87.8) | 43 (93.5) | 1.00 (Reference) | 41 (91.1) | 28 (87.5) | 1.00 (Reference) | |
| GC | 6 (12.2) | 3 (6.5) | 0.507 (0.088-2.916) 0.446 | 4 (8.9) | 4 (12.5) | 6.289 (0.699-56.583) 0.101 | |
| Alleles | |||||||
| G | 92 (93.9) | 89 (96.7) | 1.00 (Reference) | 86 (95.6) | 60 (93.8) | 1.00 (Reference) | |
| C | 6 (6.1) | 3 (3.3) | 0.526 (0.096-2.880) .0459 | 4 (4.4) | 4 (6.3) | 5.275 (0.713-39.033) 0.103 | |
Adjusted for confounder variables such as Age and Gender.
Assortments analysis of gender group for two studied polymorphisms
| SNP | Variable | Controls (n=94) n (%) | Cases (n=78) n (%) | Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs1800469 (-509) | ||||
| Genotypes | ||||
| TT | 31 (33.0) | 19 (24.4) | 1.00 (Reference) | |
| CT | 47 (50.0) | 45 (57.7) | 1.587 (0.632-3.984) 0.326 | |
| CC | 16 (17.0) | 14 (17.9) | 0.999 (0.312-3.197) 0.998 | |
| Alleles | ||||
| T | 109 (58.0) | 83 (53.2) | 1.00 (Reference) | |
| C | 79 (42.0) | 73 (46.8) | 1.046 (0.599-1.827) 0.874 | |
| rs1800471 (+915) | ||||
| Genotypes | ||||
| GG | 84 (89.4) | 71 (91.0) | 1.00 (Reference) | |
| GC | 10 (10.6) | 7 (9.0) | 1.418 (0.376-5.348) 0.606 | |
| Alleles | ||||
| G | 178 (94.7) | 149 (95.5) | 1.00 (Reference) | |
| C | 10 (5.3) | 7 (4.5) | 1.392 (0.383-5.051) 0.615 |
Adjusted for Age as a confounder variable