| Literature DB >> 28496476 |
Cumali Keskin1, Necmettin Aktepe2, Yunus Yükselten3, Asuman Sunguroglu3, Mehmet Boğa4.
Abstract
The present study investigates the antioxidant, anticancer, anticholinesterase, anti-genotoxic activities and phenolic contents of flower, fruit and seed methanol extracts of Hypericum retusum AUCHER. The amounts of protocatechuic acid, catechin, caffeic acid and syringic acid in methanol extracts were determined by HPLC. Total phenolic content of H. retusum seed extract was found more than fruit and flower extracts. The DPPH free radical scavenging activity of flower and seed methanol extracts showed close activity versus BHT as control. Among three extracts of H. retusum only flower methanol extract was exhibited considerable cytotoxic activities against to HeLa and NRK-52E cell lines. Moreover, seed methanol extract showed both acetyl and butyrl-cholinesterase inhibitory activity. The highest anti-genotoxic effects were seen 25 and 50 μg/mL concentrations. In this study, the extracts showed a strong antioxidant and anti-genotoxic effect. The seed extract was more efficient- than extracts of fruit and flowers. Our results suggest that the antioxidant and anti-genotoxic effects of extracts depend on their phenolic contents. Further studies should evaluate the in-vitro and in-vivo the benefits of H. retusum seed methanol extracts.Entities:
Keywords: Anticholinesterase; Antigenotoxic; Antioxidant; Cytotoxic; Hypericum retusum AUCHER
Year: 2017 PMID: 28496476 PMCID: PMC5423248
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Pharm Res ISSN: 1726-6882 Impact factor: 1.696
Reducing power activities and (%)DPPH free radical scavenging activities of different parts of H. retusum methanolic extracts and BHA, BHT as Control (n=3, mean±standard deviation
|
|
| |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| 10 | 0.27 ± 0.01 | 0.27 ± 0.01 | 0.22 ± 0.01 | 0.2 ± 0.01 | 0.2 ± 0.01 | 22.2 ± 0.5 | 28.97 ± 1.5 | 22.98 ± 1.3 | 72.04 ± 0.42 | 82.3 ± 0.3 |
| 20 | 0.26 ± 0.01 | 0.29 ± 0.01 | 0.29 ± 0.02 | 0.4 ± 0.02 | 0.3 ± 0.02 | 25.6 ± 0.6 | 30.80 ± 4.6 | 29.31 ± 1.6 | 79.03 ± 0.4 | 83.4 ± 0.1 |
| 50 | 0.27 ± 0.02 | 0.31 ± 0.01 | 0.32 ± 0.01 | 0.7 ± 0.03 | 0.5 ± 0.02 | 33.00 ± 0.7 | 34.43 ± 3.4 | 40.07 ± 1.5 | 80.41 ± 0.3 | 85.4 ± 0.3 |
| 100 | 0.34 ± 0.03 | 0.37 ± 0.3 | 0.42 ± 0.01 | 0.9 ± 0.05 | 0.6 ± 0.05 | 44.1 ± 1.5 | 51.17 ± 1.3 | 56.98 ± 0.8 | 81.15 ± 0.4 | 86.8 ± 0.3 |
| 250 | 0.44 ± 0.04 | 0.49 ± 0.03 | 0.60 ± 0.02 | 1.2 ± 0.14 | 0.9 ± 0.07 | 61.5 ± 1.0 | 74.67 ± 1.5 | 79.18 ± 0.1 | 84.75 ± 0.2 | 89.3 ± 04 |
| 500 | 0.60 ± 0.03 | 0.68 ± 0.02 | 0.82 ± 0.04 | 1.6 ± 0.20 | 1.1 ± 0.15 | 83.7 ± 1.6 | 77.71 ± 0.9 | 83.13 ± 0.4 | 85.2 ± 0.6 | 96.2 ± 0.8 |
Percent cell inhibition of H. retusum flower methanol extracts on HeLa and NRK-52E cell lines
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|
|
|
| |
| 0.781 | - | 4.61 |
| 1.562 | 25.45 | 17.75 |
| 3.125 | 28.98 | 24.77 |
| 6.25 | 30.34 | 42.36 |
| 12.5 | 46.02 | 59.75 |
| 25 | 57.61 | 74.25 |
| 50 | 78.40 | 90.80 |
Figure 2Effect of H. retusum flower methanol extract on HeLa and NRK-52E cell line
Figure 3A representative chromatogram of stadard mixture of phenolic compounds. 1: Protocatechuic (tR:6.290), 2: Catechin (tR: 6.823), 3: Cafeic acid (t tR: 9.520), 4: Syringic (tR: 10.107), 5: p-coumaric acid(tR:14.220), 6: o-coumaric acid (tR: 20.037
Effect of H. retusum methanol extracts on the antigenotoxicity induced by H2O2 in human mononuclear leukocyte by using comet assay
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 243.18 ± 21.10 | 257.61 ± 7.50 | 161.62 ± 6.10 |
|
| 132.99 ± 8.32 | 177.75 ± 12.07 | 228.97 ± 15.70 |
|
| 168.22 ± 9.44 | 160.77 ± 5.52 | 105.76 ± 2.40 |
|
| 276.77 ± 22.04 | 264.80 ± 14.67 | 213.53 ± 1.85 |
|
| 47.78 ± 3.80 | 20.44 ± 1.39 | 18.17 ± 1.04 |
|
| 319.89 ± 22.83 | 320.88 ± 2.59 | 313.15 ± 3.42 |
Comprehensive biological evaluation in view of antioxidant, cytotoxic, anticholinesterase and antigenotoxic activities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Aerial parts | 355.01±0.4 mg g-1 extract | 89.80 | 49.54 | 50.79 | 42 | ||||
|
| Leaves | 280 mg/g of dry mass | 90.24 | 0.84 | 113.05[ | 43 | ||||
|
| Aerial parts | 35.35 ± 4.5 mg GAL/g | 55.4 | 2.09 | 37[ | 44 | ||||
|
| Flower, fruit, seed (Methanol extracts) | 115.8±1.4 μg | 89.07 | 0.62 | NA | NA | NA | 53.67 | 20 | |
|
| Seaweeds | 94.94 ± 2.43 μg GAE/mg extract | 63.37 | 53.6 ± 17.1 | 45 | |||||
|
| Fruits | 31.2[ | 18.2[ | 5 | ||||||
|
| Flower, fruit, seed (Methanol extracts) | 130.75±1.4 μg | 83.7 | 0.60 | 17.66 | 7.97 | NA | 14.21 | 13.99 | This study |
The human breast cancer cell line (MCF 7)
The mouse breast cancer cell line (4T1)
The human colon carcinoma (HCT-8)
MDA-MB-435 (melanome) tumor cell lines