| Literature DB >> 28496132 |
A S Noman1,2, M Uddin3,4, A A Chowdhury5, M J Nayeem6, Z Raihan6, M I Rashid6, A K Azad7, M L Rahman6, D Barua6, A Sultana6, A Shirin6, J Ferdous6, R R Parag6, S M Rahman6, M R Mahmud6, C S Jerin6, N Jahan6, A Siddiqua6, T Ara6, E B Sabur6, S S Alam8, S Baidya6, S Akther6, M Z Rahman9, T Banu10, A K Murugan11, S Sabri12, S M S Islam13, B Karakas11, A Aboussekhra11, H Yeger14, W A Farhat14, S S Islam15,16.
Abstract
Serum from one hundred and ten breast cancer patients and thirty healthy female volunteers, were prospectively collected and evaluated for serum levels of Shh and IL-6 using human Shh and IL-6 specific enzyme-linked immunoassays. All patients were regularly monitored for event free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS). Overall outcome analysis was based on serum Shh and IL-6 levels. In patients with progressive metastatic BC, both serum Shh and IL-6 concentrations were elevated in 44% (29 of 65) and 63% (41 of 65) of patients, respectively, at a statistically significant level [Shh (p = 0.0001) and IL-6 (p = 0.0001)] compared to the low levels in healthy volunteers. Serum levels tended to increase with metastatic progression and lymph node positivity. High serum Shh and IL-6 levels were associated with poor EFS and OS opposite to the negative or lower levels in serum Shh and IL-6. The elevated levels of both serum Shh and IL-6 were mainly observed in BC patients who had a significantly higher risk of early recurrence and bone metastasis, and associated with a worse survival for patients with progressive metastatic BC. Further studies are warranted for validating these biomarkers as prognostic tools in a larger patient cohort and in a longer follow-up study.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28496132 PMCID: PMC5431756 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-01268-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Flow diagram of patients selection and study design. One hundred ten patients were included in the study with serum samples and complete patient’s data, while thirty-nine patients were excluded from the study due to the lack of serum sample and patient’s complete data.
Figure 2Serum Shh and IL-6 significantly differ between normal and cancer patients. (A) Serum and plasma Shh and IL-6 levels from healthy volunteers, early operable and untreated progressive metastatic breast cancer patients. (B) Serum Shh and IL-6 levels from early operable patients before and after surgery, as well as before and after chemotherapy from untreated progressive metastatic patients. (C) ROC curves of serum Shh and IL-6 as predictors in progressive metastatic breast cancer patients.
Figure 3Tumor cell number determines the Shh and IL-6 concentration quantitatively. Freshly collected cells from patient’s tumor samples were cultured for 48-hours in a serum free medium and concentrations of (A) Shh and (B) IL-6 were measured. Similarly, concentrations of (C) Shh and (D) IL-6 were measured from MDA-MB-231, MCF-7 and MCF10A cell supernatants.
Figure 4Cytokines in breast cancer patients’ serum. Array analysis of cytokines from breast cancer patient’s serum described in materials and methods. (A) Location and map of cytokine antibodies arranged and spotted on the membrane. Representative images of cytokine antibody arrays from (B) patients with early operable tumors before and after surgery, and (C) from progressive metastatic breast cancer patients before and after chemotherapy. Highlighted rectangles indicate the cytokines elevated. (D) Relative expressions of cytokines were determined by densitometer as described in materials and methods and presented as hierarchical clustering (red relatively low and green relatively high). Pos: positive controls, Neg: negative controls. (E) Western blot analysis of Shh in serum. Western blot analysis was performed from cohort of early operative (n = 29) and progressive metastatic (n = 20) breast cancer patients and a representative image shown in the figure. Molecular weight of Shh approximately 19 kDa; images shown here have been cropped to show the respective bands. Band densities were quantified with densitometry analysis using ImageJ64 (http://imageJ.nih.gov/ij).
Figure 5Sources of Shh and IL-6 in the blood serum. (A) Immunostaining of Shh and IL-6 in sections from breast cancer patients’ tumors. (B) Dual immunofluorescence staining of Shh (green) and IL-6 (red) in tumor samples, and (C) Dual immunofluorescence staining of Shh (green) and IL-6 (red) in diagnostic lymph nodes samples. (D) Blood cells isolated from early operable and progressive metastatic breast cancer patients were immunostained with Shh-PE-conjugated antibody and analyzed by NovoCyte Flow cytometry. Staining is relative to isotype-matched control. Figure shows that Shh is differentially expressed in patient’s blood cells.
Figure 6Risk stratification based on EFS and OS correlates with serum Shh and IL-6 levels in metastatic breast cancer. (A) Event free survival (EFS) of all progressive metastatic patients by serum Shh levels, (B) EFS of all progressive metastatic patients based on serum IL-6 levels, (C) EFS of all progressive metastatic patients based on a two-factor model (serum Shh and IL-6). (D) Overall survival (OS) of all progressive metastatic patients based on a two-factor model (serum Shh and IL-6). Note worse overall outcome for patients with both Shh and IL-6 at a high level.
Figure 7Bone metastasis and elevated levels of Shh and IL-6 in progressive metastatic breast cancer patients. (A) Scintigraphic imaging of whole body scan for the detection of bone metastasis from advanced stage progressive metastatic breast cancer patients showing anterior and posterior view of both shoulder and knee joints.