BACKGROUND: Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) affects 3%-10% of the population before the age of 70 years and 15%-20% after that age.The aim of the study was to compare the incidence of complications and secondary interventions in patients who underwent each type of treatment. METHODS: We analyzed 734 medical records of the Department of Surgery at the 4th Military Teaching Hospital in Wroclaw, In total, 394 were operated on with open surgery; an endarterectomy (59.39%), a vascular prosthesis implantation (31.01%), or both of these techniques (6.6%), and 340 patients had angioplasty with (50.59%) or without stenting (49.41%). RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of corresponding complications. The exception was the infection of the wound; significantly fewer were reported in the case of endovascular procedures (p = 0.0087). There were 12 occasions (3.53%) during endovascular surgeries when intraoperative conversion or re-operation using the open method occurred. In the case of open surgery, the mean hospital stay was 7.77 days (median: 8, mode: 8), while for endovascular management it was equal to 4.68 days (median: 4, mode: 3), p <0.0001. CONCLUSION: The endovascular method results in a similar re-operation rate and number of complications as open surgery.
BACKGROUND:Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) affects 3%-10% of the population before the age of 70 years and 15%-20% after that age.The aim of the study was to compare the incidence of complications and secondary interventions in patients who underwent each type of treatment. METHODS: We analyzed 734 medical records of the Department of Surgery at the 4th Military Teaching Hospital in Wroclaw, In total, 394 were operated on with open surgery; an endarterectomy (59.39%), a vascular prosthesis implantation (31.01%), or both of these techniques (6.6%), and 340 patients had angioplasty with (50.59%) or without stenting (49.41%). RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of corresponding complications. The exception was the infection of the wound; significantly fewer were reported in the case of endovascular procedures (p = 0.0087). There were 12 occasions (3.53%) during endovascular surgeries when intraoperative conversion or re-operation using the open method occurred. In the case of open surgery, the mean hospital stay was 7.77 days (median: 8, mode: 8), while for endovascular management it was equal to 4.68 days (median: 4, mode: 3), p <0.0001. CONCLUSION: The endovascular method results in a similar re-operation rate and number of complications as open surgery.
Authors: Andrew W Bradbury; Donald J Adam; Jocelyn Bell; John F Forbes; F Gerry R Fowkes; Ian Gillespie; Charles Vaughan Ruckley; Gillian M Raab Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Abigail Morbi; Manj S Gohel; Mohamed Hamady; Nicholas J W Cheshire; Colin D Bicknell Journal: Ann Vasc Surg Date: 2011-11-01 Impact factor: 1.466
Authors: Paul N Suding; William McMaster; Edward Hansen; Arthur W Hatfield; Ian L Gordon; Samuel Eric Wilson Journal: Ann Vasc Surg Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 1.466