Literature DB >> 28495348

Development of a tripolar model of technology acceptance: Hospital-based physicians' perspective on EHR.

Mher Beglaryan1, Varduhi Petrosyan2, Edward Bunker3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: In health care, information technologies (IT) hold a promise to harness an ever-increasing flow of health related information and bring significant benefits including improved quality of care, efficiency, and cost containment. One of the main tools for collecting and utilizing health data is the Electronic Health Record (EHR). EHRs implementation can face numerous barriers to acceptance including attitudes and perceptions of potential users, required effort attributed to their implementation and usage, and resistance to change. Various theories explicate different aspects of technology deployment, implementation, and acceptance. One of the common theories is the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), which helps to study the implementation of different healthcare IT applications. The objectives of this study are: to understand the barriers of EHR implementation from the perspective of physicians; to identify major determinants of physicians' acceptance of technology; and develop a model that explains better how EHRs (and technologies in general) are accepted by physicians.
METHODS: The proposed model derives from a cross-sectional survey of physicians selected through multi-stage cluster sampling from the hospitals of Yerevan, Armenia. The study team designed the survey instrument based on a literature review on barriers of EHR implementation. The analysis employed exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) with a robust weighted least squares (WLSMV) estimator for categorical indicators. The analysis progressed in two steps: appraisal of the measurement model and testing of the structural model.
RESULTS: The derived model identifies the following factors as direct determinants of behavioral intention to use a novel technology: projected collective usefulness; personal innovativeness; patient influence; and resistance to change. Other factors (e.g., organizational change, professional relationships, administrative monitoring, organizational support and computer anxiety) exert their effects through projected collective usefulness, perceived usefulness, and perceived ease of use. The model reconciles individual-oriented and environment-oriented theoretical approaches and proposes a Tripolar Model of Technology Acceptance (TMTA), bringing together three key pillars of the healthcare: patients, practitioners, and provider organizations. The proposed TMTA explains 85% of variance of behavioral intention to use technology.
CONCLUSIONS: The current study draws from the barriers of EHR implementation and identifies major determinants of technology acceptance among physicians. The study proposes TMTA as affording stronger explanative and predictive abilities for the health care system. TMTA paves a long overlooked gap in TAM and its descendants, which, in organizational settings, might distort construal of technology acceptance. It also explicates with greater depth the interdependence of different participants of the healthcare and complex interactions between healthcare and technologies.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electronic health record; Health information technology; Organizational behavior; Socio-technical factors; Structural equation modeling; Technology acceptance model

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28495348     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.02.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Inform        ISSN: 1386-5056            Impact factor:   4.046


  8 in total

1.  The intention to use an electronic health record and its antecedents among three different categories of clinical staff.

Authors:  Claudio Vitari; Roxana Ologeanu-Taddei
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 2.655

2.  Acceptance of Online Medical Websites: An Empirical Study in China.

Authors:  Yuan Tang; Yu-Tao Yang; Yun-Fei Shao
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  An Approach for Data Mining of Electronic Health Record Data for Suicide Risk Management: Database Analysis for Clinical Decision Support.

Authors:  Mark Erik Larsen; Sofian Berrouiguet; Romain Billot; Jorge Lopez-Castroman; Isabelle Jaussent; Michel Walter; Philippe Lenca; Enrique Baca-García; Philippe Courtet
Journal:  JMIR Ment Health       Date:  2019-05-07

Review 4.  The inhibiting effects of resistance to change of disability determination system: a status quo bias perspective.

Authors:  Wen-Chou Chi; Po-Jin Lin; I-Chiu Chang; Sing-Liang Chen
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 2.796

5.  Physicians' Attitude towards Electronic Medical Record Systems: An Input for Future Implementers.

Authors:  Mulugeta Hayelom Kalayou; Berhanu Fikadie Endehabtu; Habtamu Alganeh Guadie; Zeleke Abebaw; Kassahun Dessie; Shekur Mohammed Awol; Nebyu Demeke Mengestie; Abraham Yeneneh; Binyam Tilahun
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-08-28       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Determinants predicting the electronic medical record adoption in healthcare: A SEM-Artificial Neural Network approach.

Authors:  Amina Almarzouqi; Ahmad Aburayya; Said A Salloum
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 3.752

7.  Searching for New Model of Digital Informatics for Human-Computer Interaction: Testing the Institution-Based Technology Acceptance Model (ITAM).

Authors:  Youngcheoul Kang; Nakbum Choi; Seoyong Kim
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  mHealth Self-Report Monitoring in Competitive Middle- and Long-Distance Runners: Qualitative Study of Long-Term Use Intentions Using the Technology Acceptance Model.

Authors:  Sara Rönnby; Oscar Lundberg; Kristina Fagher; Jenny Jacobsson; Bo Tillander; Håkan Gauffin; Per-Olof Hansson; Örjan Dahlström; Toomas Timpka
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 4.773

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.