Sergio A Useche1, Viviola Gómez Ortiz2, Boris E Cendales3. 1. University Research Institute on Traffic and Road Safety (INTRAS), University of Valencia, Carrer del Serpis 29, Floor 3rd., Postal Code: 46022. Valencia, Spain. Electronic address: sergio.useche@uv.es. 2. Department of Psychology, University of Los Andes, Cra. 1 No. 18A-10, Office G207, Bogotá, Colombia. Electronic address: vgomez@uniandes.edu.co. 3. Faculty of Economic and Administrative Sciences, El Bosque University, Av/Cra 9 No. 131A-02. Bogotá, Colombia. Electronic address: be.cendales42@uniandes.edu.co.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: There is consistent scientific evidence that professional drivers constitute an occupational group that is highly exposed to work related stressors. Furthermore, several recent studies associate work stress and fatigue with unsafe and counterproductive work behaviors. This study examines the association between stress-related work conditions of Bus Rapid Transport (BRT) drivers and risky driving behaviors; and examines whether fatigue is a mechanism that mediates the association between the two. METHOD: A sample of 524 male Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) operators were drawn from four transport companies in Bogotá, Colombia. The participants answered a survey which included an adapted version of the Driver Behavior Questionnaire (DBQ) for BRT operators, as well as the Effort-Reward Imbalance and Job Content Questionnaires, the Subjective Fatigue subscale of the Checklist Individual Strength (CIS) and the Need for Recovery after Work Scale (NFR). RESULTS: Utilizing Structural Equation Models (SEM) it was found that risky driving behaviors in BRT operators could be predicted through job strain, effort-reward imbalance and social support at work. It was also found that fatigue and need for recovery fully mediate the associations between job strain and risky driving, and between social support and risky driving, but not the association between effort/reward imbalance (ERI) and risky driving. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that a) stress related working conditions (Job Strain, Social Support and ERI) are relevant predictors of risky driving in BRT operators, and b) that fatigue is the mechanism which links another kind of stress related to working conditions (job strain and low social support) with risky driving. The mechanism by which ERI increases risky driving in BRT operators remains unexplained. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS: This research suggests that in addition to the individual centered stress-reduction occupational programs, fatigue management interventions aimed to changing some working conditions may reduce risky driving behaviors and promote safety in the professional drivers' jobs and on the road.
INTRODUCTION: There is consistent scientific evidence that professional drivers constitute an occupational group that is highly exposed to work related stressors. Furthermore, several recent studies associate work stress and fatigue with unsafe and counterproductive work behaviors. This study examines the association between stress-related work conditions of Bus Rapid Transport (BRT) drivers and risky driving behaviors; and examines whether fatigue is a mechanism that mediates the association between the two. METHOD: A sample of 524 male Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) operators were drawn from four transport companies in Bogotá, Colombia. The participants answered a survey which included an adapted version of the Driver Behavior Questionnaire (DBQ) for BRT operators, as well as the Effort-Reward Imbalance and Job Content Questionnaires, the Subjective Fatigue subscale of the Checklist Individual Strength (CIS) and the Need for Recovery after Work Scale (NFR). RESULTS: Utilizing Structural Equation Models (SEM) it was found that risky driving behaviors in BRT operators could be predicted through job strain, effort-reward imbalance and social support at work. It was also found that fatigue and need for recovery fully mediate the associations between job strain and risky driving, and between social support and risky driving, but not the association between effort/reward imbalance (ERI) and risky driving. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that a) stress related working conditions (Job Strain, Social Support and ERI) are relevant predictors of risky driving in BRT operators, and b) that fatigue is the mechanism which links another kind of stress related to working conditions (job strain and low social support) with risky driving. The mechanism by which ERI increases risky driving in BRT operators remains unexplained. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS: This research suggests that in addition to the individual centered stress-reduction occupational programs, fatigue management interventions aimed to changing some working conditions may reduce risky driving behaviors and promote safety in the professional drivers' jobs and on the road.
Authors: Olivia Vargas-Lopez; Carlos A Perez-Ramirez; Martin Valtierra-Rodriguez; Jesus J Yanez-Borjas; Juan P Amezquita-Sanchez Journal: Sensors (Basel) Date: 2021-05-01 Impact factor: 3.576
Authors: Maheshwari Andhavarapu; James Orwa; Marleen Temmerman; Joseph Wangira Musana Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-06-25 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Silvana Andréa Molina Lima; Regina Paolucci El Dib; Meline Rossetto Kron Rodrigues; Guilherme Augusto Rago Ferraz; Ana Claudia Molina; Carlos Alberto Pilan Neto; Marcelo Aparecido Ferraz de Lima; Marilza Vieira Cunha Rudge Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-07-26 Impact factor: 3.240