Timothy E Wilens1,2, Nicholas W Carrellas1, MaryKate Martelon1, Amy M Yule1,2, Ronna Fried1, Rayce Anselmo2, Sean Esteban McCabe3. 1. Pediatric Psychopharmacology Program, Division of Child Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 2. Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 3. Institute for Research on Women and Gender, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Relatively little is known about the neuropsychological profiles of college students who misuse prescription stimulant medications. METHODS: Data presented are from college students aged 18-28 years who misused prescription stimulants prescribed for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and controls (no prescription stimulant misuse). Students were assessed neuropsychologically using the self-report Behavioral Rating Inventory of Executive Functioning (BRIEF-A), the Cambridge Automated Neuropsychological Test and Battery (CANTAB), and other tests of cognitive functioning. The analyses included 198 controls (age 20.7 ± 2.6 years) and 100 prescription stimulant misusers (age 20.7 ± 1.7 years). RESULTS: On the BRIEF-A, misusers were more likely than controls to endorse greater dysfunction on 8 of 12 measures including Inhibition, Self Monitor, Initiation, Working Memory, and Plan/Organize, when adjusting for race and sex (all p's < .05). Similarly, when dichotomizing the BRIEF-A as abnormal (T score ≥ 65), misusers had more abnormalities on five of nine subscales, as well as all major indices (p's < .05). Misusers also performed worse on several subtests of the CANTAB and standardized cognitive battery (p's < .05). A proxy of prescription stimulant misuse frequency was positively correlated with greater executive dysfunction on the BRIEF-A. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate elevated risk for neuropsychological dysfunction among students who misuse prescription stimulants compared to non-misusing peers. The presence of ADHD contributed significantly to these cognitive findings. Students who misuse prescription stimulants should be screened for neuropsychological dysfunction. SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: These data may better elucidate the neuropsychological profile of college-aged prescription stimulant misusers. (Am J Addict 2017;26:379-387).
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Relatively little is known about the neuropsychological profiles of college students who misuse prescription stimulant medications. METHODS: Data presented are from college students aged 18-28 years who misused prescription stimulants prescribed for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and controls (no prescription stimulant misuse). Students were assessed neuropsychologically using the self-report Behavioral Rating Inventory of Executive Functioning (BRIEF-A), the Cambridge Automated Neuropsychological Test and Battery (CANTAB), and other tests of cognitive functioning. The analyses included 198 controls (age 20.7 ± 2.6 years) and 100 prescription stimulant misusers (age 20.7 ± 1.7 years). RESULTS: On the BRIEF-A, misusers were more likely than controls to endorse greater dysfunction on 8 of 12 measures including Inhibition, Self Monitor, Initiation, Working Memory, and Plan/Organize, when adjusting for race and sex (all p's < .05). Similarly, when dichotomizing the BRIEF-A as abnormal (T score ≥ 65), misusers had more abnormalities on five of nine subscales, as well as all major indices (p's < .05). Misusers also performed worse on several subtests of the CANTAB and standardized cognitive battery (p's < .05). A proxy of prescription stimulant misuse frequency was positively correlated with greater executive dysfunction on the BRIEF-A. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate elevated risk for neuropsychological dysfunction among students who misuse prescription stimulants compared to non-misusing peers. The presence of ADHD contributed significantly to these cognitive findings. Students who misuse prescription stimulants should be screened for neuropsychological dysfunction. SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: These data may better elucidate the neuropsychological profile of college-aged prescription stimulant misusers. (Am J Addict 2017;26:379-387).
Authors: Antonio Verdejo-García; Antoine Bechara; Emily C Recknor; Miguel Pérez-García Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Stacey L Blase; Adrianne N Gilbert; Arthur D Anastopoulos; E Jane Costello; Rick H Hoyle; H Scott Swartzwelder; David L Rabiner Journal: J Atten Disord Date: 2009-05-27 Impact factor: 3.256
Authors: S C Baker; R D Rogers; A M Owen; C D Frith; R J Dolan; R S Frackowiak; T W Robbins Journal: Neuropsychologia Date: 1996-06 Impact factor: 3.139
Authors: Sean Esteban McCabe; Christian J Teter; Carol J Boyd; Timothy E Wilens; Ty S Schepis Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2018 Mar/Apr Impact factor: 4.384
Authors: Timothy E Wilens; MaryKate Martelon; Amy Yule; Tamar A Kaminski; Colin Burke; Ty S Schepis; Sean E McCabe Journal: Am J Addict Date: 2020-05-20
Authors: Sean Esteban McCabe; Timothy E Wilens; Carol J Boyd; Kao-Ping Chua; Terri Voepel-Lewis; Ty S Schepis Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2018-11-14 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Delaney L Davis; Daniel B Metzger; Philip H Vann; Jessica M Wong; Kumudu H Subasinghe; Isabelle K Garlotte; Nicole R Phillips; Ritu A Shetty; Michael J Forster; Nathalie Sumien Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2022-03-26 Impact factor: 4.415
Authors: Timothy E Wilens; Benjamin M Isenberg; Tamar A Kaminski; Rachael M Lyons; Javier Quintero Journal: Curr Psychiatry Rep Date: 2018-09-17 Impact factor: 5.285
Authors: Ty S Schepis; Julia D Buckner; Dalton L Klare; Lauren R Wade; Natalie Benedetto Journal: Exp Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2020-05-28 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Anselm B M Fuermaier; Oliver Tucha; Janneke Koerts; Lara Tucha; Johannes Thome; Frank Faltraco Journal: J Neural Transm (Vienna) Date: 2021-01-13 Impact factor: 3.575
Authors: Sebastian Heller; Ana Nanette Tibubos; Thilo A Hoff; Antonia M Werner; Jennifer L Reichel; Lina M Mülder; Markus Schäfer; Daniel Pfirrmann; Birgit Stark; Thomas Rigotti; Perikles Simon; Manfred E Beutel; Stephan Letzel; Pavel Dietz Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-01-18 Impact factor: 4.379