Literature DB >> 28493660

Use of medication and psychological counselling among Canadians with mood and/or anxiety disorders.

Siobhan O'Donnell1, Maria Syoufi1, Wayne Jones2, Kathryn Bennett3, Louise Pelletier1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This study describes the use of prescription medications and psychological counselling in the past 12 months among Canadian adults with a self-reported mood and/or anxiety disorder diagnosis; the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics associated with their use; and reasons for not using them.
METHODS: We used data from the 2014 Survey on Living with Chronic Diseases in Canada-Mood and Anxiety Disorders Component. The study sample (n = 2916) was divided into four treatment subgroups: (1) taking medication only; (2) having received counselling only; (3) both; or (4) neither. We combined the first three subgroups and carried out descriptive and multivariate logistic regression analyses comparing those who are taking medication and/or have received counselling in the past 12 months, versus those doing neither. Estimates were weighted to represent the Canadian adult household population living in the 10 provinces with diagnosed mood and/or anxiety disorders.
RESULTS: The majority (81.8%) of Canadians with a mood and/or an anxiety disorder diagnosis reported they are taking medications and/or have received counselling (47.6% taking medications only; 6.9% received counselling only; and 27.3% taking/having received both). Upon controlling for individual characteristics, taking medications and/or having received counselling was significantly associated with older age; higher household income; living in the Atlantic region or Quebec versus Ontario; and having concurrent disorders or mood disorders only. Symptoms controlled without medication was the most common reason for not taking medications, while preferring to manage on their own and taking medications were among the common reasons for not having received counselling.
CONCLUSION: The majority of Canadian adults with a mood and/or an anxiety disorder diagnosis are taking medications, while few have received counselling. Insights gained regarding the factors associated with these treatments, and reasons for not using them, emphasize the importance of discussing treatment options and perceived barriers with patients to ensure they receive the best treatment according to their needs and preference.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Survey on Living with Chronic Diseases in Canada; anxiety disorders; counselling; health surveys; medications; mood disorders; population surveillance; treatment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28493660      PMCID: PMC5650021          DOI: 10.24095/hpcdp.37.5.04

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can        ISSN: 2368-738X            Impact factor:   3.240


  46 in total

Review 1.  The CANMAT task force recommendations for the management of patients with mood disorders and comorbid anxiety disorders.

Authors:  Ayal Schaffer; Diane McIntosh; Benjamin I Goldstein; Neil A Rector; Roger S McIntyre; Serge Beaulieu; Richard Swinson; Lakshmi N Yatham
Journal:  Ann Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.567

Review 2.  Clinical practice guidelines. Management of anxiety disorders.

Authors: 
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.356

3.  Mental health service use and treatment adequacy for anxiety disorders in Canada.

Authors:  Pasquale Roberge; Louise Fournier; Arnaud Duhoux; Cat Tuong Nguyen; Mirrian Smolders
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 4.328

4.  The Role of Gender and Income in Predicting Barriers to Mental Health Care in Canada.

Authors:  Amanda K Slaunwhite
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2015-01-07

5.  Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) and International Society for Bipolar Disorders (ISBD) collaborative update of CANMAT guidelines for the management of patients with bipolar disorder: update 2013.

Authors:  Lakshmi N Yatham; Sidney H Kennedy; Sagar V Parikh; Ayal Schaffer; Serge Beaulieu; Martin Alda; Claire O'Donovan; Glenda Macqueen; Roger S McIntyre; Verinder Sharma; Arun Ravindran; L Trevor Young; Roumen Milev; David J Bond; Benicio N Frey; Benjamin I Goldstein; Beny Lafer; Boris Birmaher; Kyooseob Ha; Willem A Nolen; Michael Berk
Journal:  Bipolar Disord       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 6.744

Review 6.  Major depression: prevalence, treatment utilization and age in Canada.

Authors:  S B Patten; B Sedmak; M L Russell
Journal:  Can J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2001

Review 7.  Recognition of depression by non-psychiatric physicians--a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Monica Cepoiu; Jane McCusker; Martin G Cole; Maida Sewitch; Eric Belzile; Antonio Ciampi
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-10-26       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 8.  Patient preference for psychological vs pharmacologic treatment of psychiatric disorders: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  R Kathryn McHugh; Sarah W Whitton; Andrew D Peckham; Jeffrey A Welge; Michael W Otto
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.384

9.  Mindfulness-based interventions for people diagnosed with a current episode of an anxiety or depressive disorder: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Clara Strauss; Kate Cavanagh; Annie Oliver; Danelle Pettman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Introduction.

Authors:  Siobhan O'Donnell
Journal:  Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Mental Health and Addiction Services Exclusive to LGBTQ2S+ during COVID-19: An Environmental Scan.

Authors:  Michael Chaiton; Rebecca Billington; Ilana Copeland; Luc Grey; Alex Abramovich
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  Impact of anxiety and depression disorders on sustained return to work after work-related musculoskeletal strain or sprain: a gender stratified cohort study.

Authors:  Andrea Marie Jones; Mieke Koehoorn; Ute Bültmann; Christopher B McLeod
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2021-03-21       Impact factor: 5.024

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.