Literature DB >> 28493519

Neurotransmitters behind pain relief with transcranial magnetic stimulation - positron emission tomography evidence for release of endogenous opioids.

S Lamusuo1,2,3, J Hirvonen3, P Lindholm1,4, I K Martikainen5, N Hagelberg6, R Parkkola3,7, T Taiminen8, J Hietala3,8, S Helin3, A Virtanen4, A Pertovaara9, S K Jääskeläinen4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) at M1/S1 cortex has been shown to alleviate neuropathic pain.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the possible neurobiological correlates of cortical neurostimulation for the pain relief.
METHODS: We studied the effects of M1/S1 rTMS on nociception, brain dopamine D2 and μ-opioid receptors using a randomized, sham-controlled, double-blinded crossover study design and 3D-positron emission tomography (PET). Ten healthy subjects underwent active and sham rTMS treatments to the right M1/S1 cortex with E-field navigated device. Dopamine D2 and μ-receptor availabilities were assessed with PET radiotracers [11 C]raclopride and [11 C]carfentanil after each rTMS treatment. Thermal quantitative sensory testing (QST), contact heat evoked potential (CHEP) and blink reflex (BR) recordings were performed between the PET scans.
RESULTS: μ-Opioid receptor availability was lower after active than sham rTMS (P ≤ 0.0001) suggested release of endogenous opioids in the right ventral striatum, medial orbitofrontal, prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortices, and left insula, superior temporal gyrus, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and precentral gyrus. There were no differences in striatal dopamine D2 receptor availability between active and sham rTMS, consistent with lack of long-lasting measurable dopamine release. Active rTMS potentiated the dopamine-regulated habituation of the BR compared to sham (P = 0.02). Thermal QST and CHEP remained unchanged after active rTMS.
CONCLUSIONS: rTMS given to M1/S1 activates the endogenous opioid system in a wide brain network associated with processing of pain and other salient stimuli. Direct enhancement of top-down opioid-mediated inhibition may partly explain the clinical analgesic effects of rTMS. SIGNIFICANCE: Neurobiological correlates of rTMS for the pain relief are unclear. rTMS on M1/S1 with 11 C-carfentanyl-PET activates endogenous opioids. Thermal and heat pain thresholds remain unchanged. rTMS induces top-down opioid-mediated inhibition but not change the sensory discrimination of painful stimuli.
© 2017 European Pain Federation - EFIC®.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28493519     DOI: 10.1002/ejp.1052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pain        ISSN: 1090-3801            Impact factor:   3.931


  19 in total

Review 1.  News and views on in-vivo imaging of neurotransmission using PET and MRI.

Authors:  Christin Y Sander; Swen Hesse
Journal:  Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 2.346

Review 2.  Neocortical circuits in pain and pain relief.

Authors:  Linette Liqi Tan; Rohini Kuner
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Modulating functional connectivity between medial frontopolar cortex and amygdala by inhibitory and excitatory transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Philipp Riedel; Matthias Heil; Stephan Bender; Gabriel Dippel; Franziska M Korb; Michael N Smolka; Michael Marxen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 4.  Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Treatment of Neurological Diseases.

Authors:  Fahad A Somaa; Tom A de Graaf; Alexander T Sack
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 4.086

Review 5.  Engaging endogenous opioid circuits in pain affective processes.

Authors:  Blake A Kimmey; Nora M McCall; Lisa M Wooldridge; Theodore D Satterthwaite; Gregory Corder
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2020-12-13       Impact factor: 4.164

6.  New Developments in Non-invasive Brain Stimulation in Chronic Pain.

Authors:  Timothy J Meeker; Rithvic Jupudi; Frederik A Lenz; Joel D Greenspan
Journal:  Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep       Date:  2020-05-11

7.  Noninvasive motor cortex stimulation effects on quantitative sensory testing in healthy and chronic pain subjects: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Stefano Giannoni-Luza; Kevin Pacheco-Barrios; Alejandra Cardenas-Rojas; Piero F Mejia-Pando; Maria A Luna-Cuadros; Judah L Barouh; Marina Gnoatto-Medeiros; Ludmilla Candido-Santos; Alice Barra; Wolnei Caumo; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 7.926

Review 8.  Invasive Motor Cortex Stimulation Influences Intracerebral Structures in Patients With Neuropathic Pain: An Activation Likelihood Estimation Meta-Analysis of Imaging Data.

Authors:  Ruben Volkers; Esmay Giesen; Maudy van der Heiden; Mijke Kerperien; Sibylle Lange; Erkan Kurt; Robert van Dongen; Dennis Schutter; Kris C P Vissers; Dylan Henssen
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2020-02-06

9.  Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Chronic Prostatitis/Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome: A Prospective Pilot Study.

Authors:  Jussi Nikkola; Anu Holm; Marjo Seppänen; Teemu Joutsi; Esa Rauhala; Antti Kaipia
Journal:  Int Neurourol J       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 2.835

Review 10.  The Contribution of Endogenous Modulatory Systems to TMS- and tDCS-Induced Analgesia: Evidence from PET Studies.

Authors:  Marcos F DosSantos; Aleli T Oliveira; Natália R Ferreira; Antônio C P Carvalho; Paulo Henrique Rosado de Castro
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 3.037

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.