| Literature DB >> 28492791 |
Rodrigo Boemo Jaenisch1,2, Mariane Bertagnolli3, Audrey Borghi-Silva2, Ross Arena4, Pedro Dal Lago1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: : Enhanced respiratory muscle strength in patients with heart failure positively alters the clinical trajectory of heart failure. In an experimental model, respiratory muscle training in rats with heart failure has been shown to improve cardiopulmonary function through mechanisms yet to be entirely elucidated.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28492791 PMCID: PMC5409259 DOI: 10.21470/1678-9741-2017-0002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Cardiovasc Surg ISSN: 0102-7638
Morphological characteristics, infarct area and lung and hepatic congestion of sham-operated groups and rats with left ventricular dysfunction.
| Groups | Initial body weight, g | Final body weight, g | Infarcted area, % | HW/BW, mg/g | LV/BW, mg/g | RV/BW, mg/g | Pulmonary congestion, % | Hepatic congestion, % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sed-Sham | 217±12 | 323±32 | __ | 2.67±0.25 | 2.17±0.3 | 0.43±0.16 | 69.73±1.15 | 72.17±0.74 |
| RMT-Sham | 211±8 | 302±30 | __ | 2.46±0.97 | 1.97±0.77 | 0.49±0.14 | 67.98±4.75 | 72.85±0.99 |
| Sed-HF | 220±7 | 314±20 | 43.10+-4 | 3.46±0.4 | 2.58±0.2 | 1.05±0.22 | 76.73±1.39 | 72.83±1.23 |
| RMT-HF | 218±13 | 314±30 | 45.12±9 | 3.34±0.54 | 2.52±0.43 | 0.72±0.22 | 68.23±4.68 | 71.64±1.93 |
Values are means ± SD. Groups were compared by the two-way ANOVA and Tukey post hoc tests. Sedentary sham rats (Sed-Sham; n=8); respiratory muscle training sham rats (RMT-Sham; n=8); sedentary heart failure rats (Sed-HF; n=7); respiratory muscle training heart failure rats (RMT-HF; n=7). HW/BW=heart weight-to-body weight ratio; LV/BW=left ventricle-to-body weight ratio; RV/ BW=right ventricle-to-body weight ratio.
P<0.05 compared with Sed-HF and RMT-HF
P<0.05 compared with RMT-HF.
P<0.01 compared with Sed-Sham.
P<0.01 compared with Sed-Sham, RMT-Sham and RMT-HF.
Fig. 1Values are means ± SD. Two-way ANOVA and Tukey post hoc test. Sedentary sham rats (Sed-Sham; n=8); respiratory muscle training sham rats (RMT-Sham; n=8); sedentary heart failure rats (SedHF; n=7); respiratory muscle training heart failure rats (RMT-HF; n=7). A=LVEDP, LV end-diastolic pressure. ‡P<0.0001 compared with Sed-Sham, and RMT-Sham; **P<0.001 compared with Sed-HF, Sed-Sham, and RMT-Sham. B=LVSP, LV systolic pressure. **P<0.001 compared with Sed-Sham, and RMT-Sham.
Fig. 2Values are means ± SD. Two-way ANOVA and Tukey post hoc test. Sedentary sham rats (Sed-Sham; n=6); respiratory muscle training sham rats (RMT-Sham; n=6); sedentary heart failure rats (Sed-HF; n=4); respiratory muscle training heart failure rats (RMT-HF; n=4).
CS=citrate synthase. *P<0.05 compared with Sed-Sham; †P<0.05 compared with Sed-HF.
Fig. 3Correlations between citrate synthase and hemodynamic function parameters in sham rats and HF rats.
A=CS, citrate synthase; LVEDP, LV end-diastolic pressure. r=–0.60, P<0.01
B=CS; LVSP, LV systolic pressure. r=0.46, P<0.05.
| Abbreviations, acronyms & symbols | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CABG | = Coronary artery bypass graft | MI | = Myocardial infarction | |
| CS | = Citrate synthase | VO2 | = Peak oxygen consumption | |
| HF | = Heart failure | PPCs | = Postoperative pulmonary complications | |
| HR | = Heart rate | RMT | = Respiratory muscle training | |
| LV | = Left ventricle | RV | = Right ventricle | |
| LVEDP | = Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure | SAP | = Systolic arterial pressure | |
| LVSP | = Left ventricular systolic pressure | SD | = Standard deviation | |
| MAP | = Mean arterial pressure | STICH | = Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure | |
| Authors' roles & responsibilities | |
|---|---|
| RBJ | Conception and design study; manuscript
redaction or |
| MB | Conception and design study; manuscript
redaction or |
| ABS | Conception and design study; manuscript
redaction or |
| RA | Conception and design study; manuscript
redaction or |
| PDL | Conception and design study; manuscript
redaction or |