| Literature DB >> 28491569 |
Carlo Pappone1, Gabriele Vicedomini1, Andrea Petretta1, Luigi Giannelli1, Amarild Cuko1, Vincenzo Santinelli1.
Abstract
Entities:
Keywords: AF, atrial fibrillation; Atrial fibrillation; BrS, Brugada syndrome; Brugada syndrome; EPT, electrophysiologic testing; Flecainide; ICD, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; Sudden death; VF, ventricular fibrillation; VT, ventricular tachycardia; Ventricular fibrillation
Year: 2015 PMID: 28491569 PMCID: PMC5419534 DOI: 10.1016/j.hrcr.2015.02.013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: HeartRhythm Case Rep ISSN: 2214-0271
Figure 1A: Baseline 12-lead ECG shows no abnormality. B: After flecainide testing, a coved ST-segment elevation in leads V1–V2 compatible with a type I Brugada syndrome ECG pattern was evident.
Figure 2Programmed ventricular stimulation resulted in concomitant development of ventricular fibrillation (VF) and atrial fibrillation (AF). VF lasted 7 seconds and spontaneously reverted to sustained AF. The paper speeds are as follows: A: 16 mm/s; B: 25 mm/s.
Figure 3Twelve-lead ECG after electrophysiologic testing showing a stable sinus rhythm with coved Brugada syndrome pattern.
KEY TEACHING POINTS
Atrial fibrillation (AF) can be the first clinical manifestation of latent Brugada syndrome (BrS). AF triggering ventricular fibrillation and ventricular fibrillation triggering AF are 2 distinct clinical manifestations sharing common genetic mechanisms. Patients with new-onset lone AF and latent BrS may be at risk of sudden death. Caution should be used in using intravenous flecainide to acutely treat paroxysmal AF in patients with new-onset lone AF. Guideline recommendations for AF should include flecainide testing to identify patients with new-onset lone AF and latent BrS to avoid potential fatalities. |