Literature DB >> 28491144

Clinical effectiveness and toxicity of second-line irinotecan in advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: a single-center observational study.

Sebastian Ochenduszko1, Mirosława Puskulluoglu2, Kamil Konopka3, Kamil Fijorek4, Agnieszka Julia Slowik2, Michał Pędziwiatr5, Andrzej Budzyński5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Randomized clinical trials showed improved overall survival (OS) of advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA) patients treated with second-line taxane or irinotecan. However, most data on irinotecan efficacy in this setting come from large Asian trials. We retrospectively analyzed clinical effectiveness and toxicity of irinotecan in a cohort of patients with advanced GEA treated in our department.
METHODS: Advanced GEA patients who received at least one cycle of second-line irinotecan were eligible for inclusion. Irinotecan was administered every 3 weeks at an initial dose of 250 mg/m2 of body surface area with subsequent gradual (every 50 mg/m2) dose escalation up to 350 mg/m2, in the case of good treatment tolerance. OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. A multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to examine the association between clinical and laboratory parameters and survival.
RESULTS: A total of 48 patients were identified. Median OS was 6.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 3.9-7.6]. In multivariate analysis, age < 65 years, baseline total lymphocyte count (TLC) < 1500/µl and presence of peritoneal metastases were associated with shorter OS. Most adverse events were grade 1-2 and included: anemia (52.3%), leukocytopenia (40.9%), neutropenia (59.1%), nausea (25.0%), vomiting (31.8%), diarrhea (31.8%), anorexia (29.5%) and fatigue (43.2%). Febrile neutropenia occurred in three patients (6.8%). Nine patients (20.5%) experienced a toxicity grade 3-4 of any kind.
CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective analysis confirms clinical effectiveness and manageable toxicity of second-line irinotecan in an unselected cohort of advanced GEA patients. Age < 65 years, baseline TLC < 1500/µl and presence of peritoneal metastases were independent prognostic factors associated with shorter OS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  gastric cancer; gastroesophageal cancer; irinotecan; second-line chemotherapy

Year:  2017        PMID: 28491144      PMCID: PMC5405997          DOI: 10.1177/1758834016689029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol        ISSN: 1758-8340            Impact factor:   8.168


  26 in total

Review 1.  The causes and consequences of cancer-associated malnutrition.

Authors:  Eric Van Cutsem; Jann Arends
Journal:  Eur J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.398

2.  Survival advantage for irinotecan versus best supportive care as second-line chemotherapy in gastric cancer--a randomised phase III study of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie (AIO).

Authors:  Peter C Thuss-Patience; Albrecht Kretzschmar; Dmitry Bichev; Tillman Deist; Axel Hinke; Kirstin Breithaupt; Yasemin Dogan; Bernhard Gebauer; Guido Schumacher; Peter Reichardt
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 9.162

3.  Salvage chemotherapy for pretreated gastric cancer: a randomized phase III trial comparing chemotherapy plus best supportive care with best supportive care alone.

Authors:  Jung Hun Kang; Soon Il Lee; Do Hyoung Lim; Keon-Woo Park; Sung Yong Oh; Hyuk-Chan Kwon; In Gyu Hwang; Sang-Cheol Lee; Eunmi Nam; Dong Bok Shin; Jeeyun Lee; Joon Oh Park; Young Suk Park; Ho Yeong Lim; Won Ki Kang; Se Hoon Park
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Gastric carcinoma in young adults.

Authors:  P J Matley; D M Dent; M V Madden; S K Price
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Why do patients with weight loss have a worse outcome when undergoing chemotherapy for gastrointestinal malignancies?

Authors:  H J Andreyev; A R Norman; J Oates; D Cunningham
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  Race and ethnicity correlate with survival in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  J Kim; C-L Sun; B Mailey; C Prendergast; A Artinyan; S Bhatia; A Pigazzi; J D I Ellenhorn
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  Multivariate prognostic factor analysis in locally advanced and metastatic esophago-gastric cancer--pooled analysis from three multicenter, randomized, controlled trials using individual patient data.

Authors:  Ian Chau; Andy R Norman; David Cunningham; Justin S Waters; Jacqui Oates; Paul J Ross
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-06-15       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Randomized, open-label, phase III study comparing irinotecan with paclitaxel in patients with advanced gastric cancer without severe peritoneal metastasis after failure of prior combination chemotherapy using fluoropyrimidine plus platinum: WJOG 4007 trial.

Authors:  Shuichi Hironaka; Shinya Ueda; Hirofumi Yasui; Tomohiro Nishina; Masahiro Tsuda; Takehiko Tsumura; Naotoshi Sugimoto; Hideki Shimodaira; Shinya Tokunaga; Toshikazu Moriwaki; Taito Esaki; Michitaka Nagase; Kazumasa Fujitani; Kensei Yamaguchi; Takashi Ura; Yasuo Hamamoto; Satoshi Morita; Isamu Okamoto; Narikazu Boku; Ichinosuke Hyodo
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Ramucirumab plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel in patients with previously treated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (RAINBOW): a double-blind, randomised phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Hansjochen Wilke; Kei Muro; Eric Van Cutsem; Sang-Cheul Oh; György Bodoky; Yasuhiro Shimada; Shuichi Hironaka; Naotoshi Sugimoto; Oleg Lipatov; Tae-You Kim; David Cunningham; Philippe Rougier; Yoshito Komatsu; Jaffer Ajani; Michael Emig; Roberto Carlesi; David Ferry; Kumari Chandrawansa; Jonathan D Schwartz; Atsushi Ohtsu
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 41.316

10.  Chemotherapy vs supportive care alone for relapsed gastric, gastroesophageal junction, and oesophageal adenocarcinoma: a meta-analysis of patient-level data.

Authors:  Tobias Janowitz; Peter Thuss-Patience; Andrea Marshall; Jung Hun Kang; Claire Connell; Natalie Cook; Janet Dunn; Se Hoon Park; Hugo Ford
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  5 in total

1.  A methylation-based mRNA signature predicts survival in patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  Yang Li; Rongrong Sun; Youwei Zhang; Yuan Yuan; Yufeng Miao
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 5.722

2.  Irinotecan Induces Autophagy-Dependent Apoptosis and Positively Regulates ROS-Related JNK- and P38-MAPK Pathways in Gastric Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Qingyun Zhu; Yuehui Guo; Shiwei Chen; Daiquan Fu; Yanxiang Li; Zhi Li; Caifang Ni
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Downregulated Circular RNA hsa_circ_0000291 Suppresses Migration And Proliferation Of Gastric Cancer Via Targeting The miR-183/ITGB1 Axis.

Authors:  Chuanwu Cao; Shilong Han; Yifeng Yuan; Yongfa Wu; Weishuai Lian; Xiaojun Zhang; Long Pan; Maoquan Li
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 3.989

4.  Four Immune-Related Long Non-coding RNAs for Prognosis Prediction in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Muqi Li; Minni Liang; Tian Lan; Xiwen Wu; Wenxuan Xie; Tielong Wang; Zhitao Chen; Shunli Shen; Baogang Peng
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2020-12-08

5.  The role of different adjuvant therapies in locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Ilaria Benevento; Nadia Bulzonetti; Francesca De Felice; Daniela Musio; Massimo Vergine; Vincenzo Tombolini
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-09-21
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.