Literature DB >> 28490435

Home Dialysis in the Prospective Payment System Era.

Eugene Lin1,2, Xingxing S Cheng3, Kuo-Kai Chin4, Talhah Zubair4, Glenn M Chertow3, Eran Bendavid2, Jayanta Bhattacharya2.   

Abstract

The ESRD Prospective Payment System introduced two incentives to increase home dialysis use: bundling injectable medications into a single payment for treatment and paying for home dialysis training. We evaluated the effects of the ESRD Prospective Payment System on home dialysis use by patients starting dialysis in the United States from January 1, 2006 to August 31, 2013. We analyzed data on dialysis modality, insurance type, and comorbidities from the United States Renal Data System. We estimated the effect of the policy on home dialysis use with multivariable logistic regression and compared the effect on Medicare Parts A/B beneficiaries with the effect on patients with other types of insurance. The ESRD Prospective Payment System associated with a 5.0% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 4.0% to 6.0%) increase in home dialysis use by the end of the study period. Home dialysis use increased by 5.8% (95% CI, 4.3% to 6.9%) among Medicare beneficiaries and 4.1% (95% CI, 2.3% to 5.4%) among patients covered by other forms of health insurance. The difference between these groups was not statistically significant (1.8%; 95% CI, -0.2% to 3.8%). Conversely, in both populations, the training add-on did not associate with increases in home dialysis use beyond the effect of the policy. The ESRD Prospective Payment System bundling, but not the training add-on, associated with substantial increases in home dialysis, which were identical for both Medicare and non-Medicare patients. These spill-over effects suggest that major payment changes in Medicare can affect all patients with ESRD.
Copyright © 2017 by the American Society of Nephrology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Economic Analysis; United States Renal Data System; chronic dialysis; end-stage renal disease; peritoneal dialysis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28490435      PMCID: PMC5619970          DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2017010041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol        ISSN: 1046-6673            Impact factor:   10.121


  40 in total

1.  Multiple imputation by chained equations: what is it and how does it work?

Authors:  Melissa J Azur; Elizabeth A Stuart; Constantine Frangakis; Philip J Leaf
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.035

2.  Effect of electronic prescribing with formulary decision support on medication use and cost.

Authors:  Michael A Fischer; Christine Vogeli; Margaret Stedman; Timothy Ferris; M Alan Brookhart; Joel S Weissman
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2008-12-08

3.  Financial implications to Medicare from changing the dialysis modality mix under the bundled prospective payment system.

Authors:  Frank X Liu; Surrey M Walton; Robert Leipold; Deborah Isbell; Thomas A Golper
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 1.756

4.  Medicare program; End-Stage Renal Disease prospective payment system, quality incentive program, and Durable Medical Equipment, Prosthetics, Orthotics, and Supplies. Final rule.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  2014-11-06

Review 5.  Peritoneal dialysis patient selection: characteristics for success.

Authors:  Philip Kam-Tao Li; Kai Ming Chow
Journal:  Adv Chronic Kidney Dis       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.620

6.  The initial impact of Medicare's new prospective payment system for kidney dialysis.

Authors:  Richard A Hirth; Marc N Turenne; John R C Wheeler; Tammie A Nahra; Kathryn K Sleeman; Wei Zhang; Joseph A Messana
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 8.860

Review 7.  The changing landscape of home dialysis in the United States.

Authors:  Matthew B Rivara; Rajnish Mehrotra
Journal:  Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Financial implications of choice of dialysis type of the revised Medicare payment system: an economic analysis.

Authors:  John Hornberger; Richard A Hirth
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2012-05-05       Impact factor: 8.860

Review 9.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of utility-based quality of life in chronic kidney disease treatments.

Authors:  Melanie Wyld; Rachael Lisa Morton; Andrew Hayen; Kirsten Howard; Angela Claire Webster
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  Avoiding bias due to perfect prediction in multiple imputation of incomplete categorical variables.

Authors:  Ian R White; Rhian Daniel; Patrick Royston
Journal:  Comput Stat Data Anal       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 1.681

View more
  16 in total

1.  Health Insurance and the Use of Peritoneal Dialysis in the United States.

Authors:  Jose J Perez; Bo Zhao; Samaya Qureshi; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer; Kevin F Erickson
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2017-12-23       Impact factor: 8.860

2.  The "Advancing American Kidney Health" Executive Order: Challenges and Opportunities for the Large Dialysis Organizations.

Authors:  Eugene Lin; Paul B Ginsburg; Glenn M Chertow; Jeffrey S Berns
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 8.860

3.  A View of the Bundle from a Home Dialysis Perspective: Present at the Creation.

Authors:  Thomas A Golper
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 8.237

4.  Keys to Driving Implementation of the New Kidney Care Models.

Authors:  Abhijit V Kshirsagar; Daniel E Weiner; Mallika L Mendu; Frank Liu; Susie Q Lew; Terrence J O'Neil; Scott D Bieber; David L White; Jonathan Zimmerman; Sumit Mohan
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 10.614

5.  Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Kidney Replacement Therapies Among Adults With Kidney Failure: An Observational Study of Variation by Patient Age.

Authors:  Adam S Wilk; Janet R Cummings; Laura C Plantinga; Harold A Franch; Janice P Lea; Rachel E Patzer
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 11.072

6.  Medicare's New Prospective Payment System on Facility Provision of Peritoneal Dialysis.

Authors:  Virginia Wang; Cynthia J Coffman; Linda L Sanders; Shoou-Yih D Lee; Richard A Hirth; Matthew L Maciejewski
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 8.237

7.  Trends in Peritoneal Dialysis Use in the United States after Medicare Payment Reform.

Authors:  Caroline E Sloan; Cynthia J Coffman; Linda L Sanders; Matthew L Maciejewski; Shoou-Yih D Lee; Richard A Hirth; Virginia Wang
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 8.237

8.  Conflicts of interest in dialysis: A barrier to policy reforms.

Authors:  Aaron Glickman; Eugene Lin; Jeffrey S Berns
Journal:  Semin Dial       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 3.455

9.  Expanded Prospective Payment System and Use of and Outcomes with Home Dialysis by Race and Ethnicity in the United States.

Authors:  Jenny I Shen; Kevin F Erickson; Lucia Chen; Sitaram Vangala; Lynn Leng; Anuja Shah; Anjali B Saxena; Jeffrey Perl; Keith C Norris
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 10.614

10.  Continuation of Peritoneal Dialysis in Adult Kidney Transplant Recipients With Delayed Graft Function.

Authors:  Ali I Gardezi; Brenda Muth; Adil Ghaffar; Fahad Aziz; Neetika Garg; Maha Mohamed; David Foley; Dixon Kaufman; Arjang Djamali; Didier Mandelbrot; Sandesh Parajuli
Journal:  Kidney Int Rep       Date:  2021-04-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.