Literature DB >> 28490180

"Category 4A" microcalcifications: how should this subcategory be applied to microcalcifications seen on mammography?

Jihee Kim1, Eun-Kyung Kim1, Min Jung Kim1, Hee Jung Moon1, Jung Hyun Yoon1.   

Abstract

Background The BI-RADS provides descriptors for microcalcifications based on morphology and distribution. However, the descriptor for category 4A microcalcifications is not specified in the 5th BI-RADS nor in the prior editions. Purpose To investigate how the category 4A assessment is applied to suspicious microcalcifications, and the appropriate descriptors for category 4A assessment for microcalcifications seen on mammography. Material and Methods From June 2008 to November 2011, 296 women with 305 suspicious microcalcifications that were assessed as BI-RADS category 4A, who underwent imaging-guided biopsy or surgery, were included. Mammograms were reviewed and imaging features were analyzed according to the morphology and distribution descriptors of the 5th edition of BI-RADS. Pathological results were considered as the reference standard. Positive predictive values were calculated and compared between morphology and distribution descriptors. Results The overall positive predictive value (PPV) of category 4A microcalcifications was 17.7% (54/305). Most common descriptors for category 4A microcalcifications were amorphous morphology (73.1%) and grouped distribution (71.1%). PPVs of individual morphology descriptors were as follows: amorphous = 7.2%; coarse heterogeneous = 12.8%; fine pleomorphic or fine linear/fine linear branching = 91.4% ( P < 0.001). PPVs of distribution descriptors were as follows: regional = 13.2%; grouped = 16.1%; linear/segmental = 54.5% ( P < 0.001). For morphology and distribution descriptors combinations, PPVs for amorphous/regional and amorphous/grouped microcalcifications were 6.8% and 6.9%, while PPVs of other combinations were higher than 10%, respectively. Conclusion Common descriptors used in category 4A assessment for microcalcifications are amorphous morphology and grouped distribution. PPV of amorphous/regional and amorphous/grouped microcalcifications were suitable for category 4A assessment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast; biopsy; mammography; microcalcifications

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28490180     DOI: 10.1177/0284185117709036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Radiol        ISSN: 0284-1851            Impact factor:   1.990


  3 in total

1.  Comprehensive quantitative malignant risk prediction of pure grouped amorphous calcifications: clinico-mammographic nomogram.

Authors:  Lijuan Shen; Tingting Jiang; Pengzhou Tang; Huijuan Ge; Chao You; Weijun Peng
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-05

2.  Scoring System to Stratify Malignancy Risks for Mammographic Microcalcifications Based on Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System 5th Edition Descriptors.

Authors:  Ji Hyun Youk; Hye Mi Gweon; Eun Ju Son; Na Lae Eun; Eun Jung Choi; Jeong Ah Kim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.500

3.  Malignancy Risk Stratification Prediction of Amorphous Calcifications Based on Clinical and Mammographic Features.

Authors:  Lijuan Shen; Xiaowen Ma; Tingting Jiang; Xigang Shen; Wentao Yang; Chao You; Weijun Peng
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 3.989

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.