| Literature DB >> 28490153 |
Tae-Young Jung1, Sangjoon Chong2, In-Young Kim1, Ji Yeoun Lee2,3, Ji Hoon Phi2, Seung-Ki Kim2, Jae-Hyoo Kim4, Kyu-Chang Wang2.
Abstract
A variety of complications in endoscopic third ventriculostomy have been reported, including neurovascular injury, hemodynamic alterations, endocrinologic abnormalities, electrolyte imbalances, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, fever and infection. Even though most complications are transient, the overall rate of permanent morbidity is 2.38% and the overall mortality rate is 0.28%. To avoid these serious complications, we should keep in mind potential complications and how to prevent them. Proper decisions with regard to surgical indication, choice of endoscopic entry and trajectory, careful endoscopic procedures with anatomic orientation, bleeding control and tight closure are emphasized for the prevention of complications.Entities:
Keywords: Neuroendoscopy; Peoperative complications/prevention & control; Ventriculostomy
Year: 2017 PMID: 28490153 PMCID: PMC5426448 DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2017.0101.014
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Korean Neurosurg Soc ISSN: 1225-8245
Fig. 1A recommendable trajectory for simultaneous ETV and biopsy is shown as an arrow on the midsagittal MR image in a patient with a pineal mass and hydrocephalus. It is set between two paths for endoscopic third ventriculostomy (dotted line) and biopsy (solid line). Note that the burr hole (colored ellipse) is elongated in an anterior-posterior direction. ETV: endoscopic third ventriculostomy, MR: magnetic resonance.
Fig. 2A schematic drawing showing a case of brain damage caused by an instrument when the endoscope is too close to the ventricle wall before the instrument is identified through the endoscope (right). When the endoscope is placed sufficiently away from the wall (left), the instrument does not cause brain damage while it enters the endoscopic view.