Literature DB >> 28489471

Effect of the 2011 Revisions to the Field Triage Guidelines on Under- and Over-Triage Rates for Pediatric Trauma Patients.

E Brooke Lerner, Jeremy T Cushman, Amy L Drendel, Mohamed Badawy, Manish N Shah, Clare E Guse, Arthur Cooper.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 2011, revised Field Triage Guidelines were released jointly by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the American College of Surgeons - Committee on Trauma (ACS-COT). It is unknown how the modifications will affect the number of injured children identified by EMS providers as needing transport to a trauma center.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the change in under- and over-triage rates when the 2011 Field Triage Guidelines are compared to the 2006 and 1999 versions.
METHODS: EMS providers in charge of care for injured children (<15 years) transported to pediatric trauma centers in 3 mid-sized cities were interviewed immediately after completing transport. Patients were included regardless of injury severity. The interview included patient demographics and each criterion from the Field Triage Guidelines' physiologic status, anatomic injury, and mechanism of injury steps. Included patients were followed through hospital discharge. The 1999, 2006, and 2011 Guidelines were each retrospectively applied to the collected data. Children were considered to have needed a trauma center if they had non-orthopedic surgery within 24 hours, ICU admission, or died. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.
RESULTS: EMS interviews were conducted for 5,610 children and outcome data was available for 5,594 (99.7%). Average age was 7.6 years; 5% of children were identified as needing a trauma center using the study outcome. Applying the 1999, 2006, or 2011 Guidelines to the EMS interview data the over-triage rate was 32.6%, 27.9%, and 28.0%, respectively. The under-triage rate was 26.5%, 35.1%, and 34.8%, respectively. The 2011 Guidelines resulted in an 8.2% (95% CI 0.6-15.9%) absolute increase in under-triage and a 4.6% (95% CI 2.8-6.3%) decrease in over-triage compared to 1999 Guidelines.
CONCLUSION: Use of the Field Triage Guidelines for children resulted in an unacceptably high rate of under-triage regardless of the version used. Use of the 2011 Guidelines increased under-triage compared to the 1999 version. Research is needed to determine how to better assist EMS providers in identifying children who need the resources of a trauma center.

Entities:  

Keywords:  emergency medical services; emergency medical technicians; pediatrics; triage; wounds and injury

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28489471     DOI: 10.1080/10903127.2017.1300717

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care        ISSN: 1090-3127            Impact factor:   3.077


  8 in total

1.  Factors associated with EMS transport decisions for pediatric patients after motor vehicle collisions.

Authors:  Thomas Hartka; Federico E Vaca
Journal:  Traffic Inj Prev       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 1.491

Review 2.  Prehospital triage tools across the world: a scoping review of the published literature.

Authors:  Smitha Bhaumik; Merhej Hannun; Chelsea Dymond; Kristen DeSanto; Whitney Barrett; Lee A Wallis; Nee-Kofi Mould-Millman
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 3.803

3.  National guideline for the field triage of injured patients: Recommendations of the National Expert Panel on Field Triage, 2021.

Authors:  Craig D Newgard; Peter E Fischer; Mark Gestring; Holly N Michaels; Gregory J Jurkovich; E Brooke Lerner; Mary E Fallat; Theodore R Delbridge; Joshua B Brown; Eileen M Bulger
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 3.697

4.  Mechanism of injury and special considerations as predictive of serious injury: A systematic review.

Authors:  Joshua R Lupton; Cynthia Davis-O'Reilly; Rebecca M Jungbauer; Craig D Newgard; Mary E Fallat; Joshua B Brown; N Clay Mann; Gregory J Jurkovich; Eileen Bulger; Mark L Gestring; E Brooke Lerner; Roger Chou; Annette M Totten
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 5.221

5.  Initial assessment, level of care and outcome among children who were seen by emergency medical services: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Carl Magnusson; Johan Herlitz; Thomas Karlsson; Christer Axelsson
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  Mobile Decision Support Tool for Emergency Departments and Mass Casualty Incidents (EDIT): Initial Study.

Authors:  Nicholas Boltin; Diego Valdes; Joan M Culley; Homayoun Valafar
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 4.773

7.  Priority accuracy by dispatch centers and Emergency Medical Services professionals in trauma patients: a cohort study.

Authors:  Job F Waalwijk; Robin D Lokerman; Rogier van der Sluijs; Audrey A A Fiddelers; Luke P H Leenen; Mark van Heijl; Martijn Poeze
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 3.693

8.  Does Mechanism of Injury Predict Trauma Center Need for Children?

Authors:  E Brooke Lerner; Mohamed Badawy; Jeremy T Cushman; Amy L Drendel; Nicole Fumo; Courtney M C Jones; Manish N Shah; David M Gourlay
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 3.077

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.