Literature DB >> 28489395

Identification of Potent and Selective CYP1A1 Inhibitors via Combined Ligand and Structure-Based Virtual Screening and Their in Vitro Validation in Sacchrosomes and Live Human Cells.

Prashant Joshi1,2, Glen J P McCann3, Vinay R Sonawane3, Ram A Vishwakarma1,2, Bhabatosh Chaudhuri3,4, Sandip B Bharate1,2.   

Abstract

Target structure-guided virtual screening (VS) is a versatile, powerful, and inexpensive alternative to experimental high-throughput screening (HTS). To discover potent CYP1A1 enzyme inhibitors for cancer chemoprevention, a commercial library of 50 000 small molecules was utilized for VS guided by both ligand and structure-based strategies. For experimental validation, 300 ligands were proposed based on combined analysis of fitness scores from ligand based e-pharmacophore screening and docking score, prime MMGB/SA binding affinity and interaction pattern analysis from structure-based VS. These 300 compounds were screened, at 10 μM concentration, for in vitro inhibition of CYP1A1-Sacchrosomes (yeast-derived microsomal enzyme) in the ethoxyresorufin-O-de-ethylase assay. Thirty-two compounds displayed >50% inhibition of CYP1A1 enzyme activity at 10 μM. 2-Phenylimidazo-[1,2-a]quinoline (5121780, 119) was found to be the most potent with 97% inhibition. It also inhibited ∼95% activity of CYP1B1 and CYP1A2, the other two CYP1 enzymes. The compound 5121780 (119) showed high selectivity toward inhibition of CYP1 enzymes with respect to CYP2 and CYP3 enzymes (i.e., there was no detectable inhibition of CYP2D6/CYP2C9/CYP2C19 and CYP3A4 at 10 μM). It was further investigated in live CYP-expressing human cell system, which confirmed that compound 5121780 (119) potently inhibited CYP1A1, CYP1A2, CYP1B1 enzymes with IC50 values of 269, 30, and 56 nM, respectively. Like in Sacchrosomes, inhibition of CYP2D6/CYP2C9/CYP2C19 and CYP3A4 enzymes, expressed within live human cells, could hardly be detected at 10 μM. The compound 119 rescued CYP1A1 overexpressing HEK293 cells from CYP1A1 mediated benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P) toxicity and also overcame cisplatin resistance in CYP1B1 overexpressing HEK293 cells. Molecular dynamics simulations of 5121780 (119) with CYP1 enzymes was performed to understand the interaction pattern to CYP isoforms. Results indicate that VS can successfully be used to identify promising CYP1A1 inhibitors, which may have potential in the development of novel cancer chemo-preventive agents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28489395     DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  9 in total

1.  Docking simulation and antibiotic discovery targeting the MlaC protein in Gram-negative bacteria.

Authors:  Yu-Ming M Huang; Jason Munguia; Yinglong Miao; Victor Nizet; J Andrew McCammon
Journal:  Chem Biol Drug Des       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 2.817

2.  New fluorescence-based high-throughput screening assay for small molecule inhibitors of tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase 2 (TDP2).

Authors:  Carlos J A Ribeiro; Jayakanth Kankanala; Ke Shi; Kayo Kurahashi; Evgeny Kiselev; Azhar Ravji; Yves Pommier; Hideki Aihara; Zhengqiang Wang
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Sci       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 4.384

3.  Identification of karanjin isolated from the Indian beech tree as a potent CYP1 enzyme inhibitor with cellular efficacy via screening of a natural product repository.

Authors:  Prashant Joshi; Vinay R Sonawane; Ibidapo S Williams; Glen J P McCann; Linda Gatchie; Rajni Sharma; Naresh Satti; Bhabatosh Chaudhuri; Sandip B Bharate
Journal:  Medchemcomm       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 3.597

4.  Sensing the Generation of Intracellular Free Electrons Using the Inactive Catalytic Subunit of Cytochrome P450s as a Sink.

Authors:  Damilare D Akintade; Bhabatosh Chaudhuri
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Machine learning-driven identification of drugs inhibiting cytochrome P450 2C9.

Authors:  Elodie Goldwaser; Catherine Laurent; Nathalie Lagarde; Sylvie Fabrega; Laure Nay; Bruno O Villoutreix; Christian Jelsch; Arnaud B Nicot; Marie-Anne Loriot; Maria A Miteva
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 6.  Pharmacological blockage of the AHR-CYP1A1 axis: a call for in vivo evidence.

Authors:  N R Coelho; A B Pimpão; J Morello; S A Pereira; M J Correia; T C Rodrigues; E C Monteiro
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2021-11-20       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 7.  Computer-Aided (In Silico) Modeling of Cytochrome P450-Mediated Food-Drug Interactions (FDI).

Authors:  Yelena Guttman; Zohar Kerem
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-07-31       Impact factor: 6.208

8.  Computer-Aided Drug Design (CADD) to De-Orphanize Marine Molecules: Finding Potential Therapeutic Agents for Neurodegenerative and Cardiovascular Diseases.

Authors:  Laura Llorach-Pares; Alfons Nonell-Canals; Conxita Avila; Melchor Sanchez-Martinez
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 5.118

9.  Structure-based virtual screening of CYP1A1 inhibitors: towards rapid tier-one assessment of potential developmental toxicants.

Authors:  Janice Jia Ni Goh; Julian Behn; Cheng-Shoong Chong; Guorui Zhong; Sebastian Maurer-Stroh; Hao Fan; Lit-Hsin Loo
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 5.153

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.