Literature DB >> 2848933

Dissection of the neuron network in the catfish inner retina. I. Transmission to ganglion cells.

H M Sakai1, K Naka.   

Abstract

1. To characterize the signal transmission from amacrine to ganglion cells, and to identify the filter that transforms amacrine-cell responses into ganglion-cell spike discharges, an extrinsic current, either sinusoidally or white-noise modulated, was injected into an amacrine cell and the resulting extracellular spike discharges were recorded from a neighboring ganglion cell. For the sinusoidal inputs, PST (poststimulus time) histograms were produced; for the white-noise inputs, first- and second-order Wiener kernels were computed by a cross-correlation process. 2. Extrinsic current injected either into a type-N (sustained) amacrine cell or a type-C (transient) amacrine cell modulated the spike discharges of nearby ganglion cells, whether of the "ON," "ON-OFF" or "OFF" types. We identified two modes of signal transmission, fast (probably monosynaptic) and slow (probably polysynaptic) transmission. Signal transmission from amacrine to ganglion cells of the same response polarity i.e., from type-NA (depolarizing, sustained) amacrine to ON-ganglion cell and from-NB (hyperpolarizing, sustained) amacrine to OFF-ganglion cell, was either fast or slow. Similarly, the signal transmission from type-C to either ON- or OFF-ganglion cells was either fast or slow. 3. The signal transmission from amacrine to ganglion cell of the opposite response polarity, i.e., from type-NA to OFF-ganglion cell and from type-NB to ON-ganglion cell, was always slow. 4. Fast transmission from type-N amacrine to a ganglion cell of the same polarity, or from type-C to either ON- or OFF-ganglion cells was always sign-noninverting. The transfer function was lowpass, with a cutoff frequency of 30 Hz. 5. Slow transmission from any type of amacrine cell (either type-NA, -NB or -C) to ON-ganglion cells was always sign inverting, whereas from any amacrine to OFF-ganglion cells was always sign-noninverting. The transfer function for the slow transmission was narrow bandpass, with a cutoff frequency of 30-40 Hz.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2848933     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1988.60.5.1549

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  6 in total

1.  Disinhibitory gating of retinal output by transmission from an amacrine cell.

Authors:  Mihai Manu; Stephen A Baccus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  The identification of nonlinear biological systems: Wiener kernel approaches.

Authors:  M J Korenberg; I W Hunter
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  The identification of nonlinear biological systems: Volterra kernel approaches.

Authors:  M J Korenberg; I W Hunter
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1996 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  Response variability in retinal ganglion cells of primates.

Authors:  L J Croner; K Purpura; E Kaplan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-09-01       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The maintained discharge of rat retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Daniel K Freeman; Walter F Heine; Christopher L Passaglia
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2008-07-18       Impact factor: 3.241

6.  Response dynamics and receptive-field organization of catfish ganglion cells.

Authors:  H M Sakai; K Naka
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.086

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.