Literature DB >> 28488834

The efficacy of wearable activity tracking technology as part of a weight loss program: a systematic review.

Scott W Cheatham1, Kyle R Stull2, Mike Fantigrassi2, Ian Motel2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The world obesity rate has increased over the past two decades. This problem has been linked to inactivity and lack of exercise among individuals which prompted the development of wearable activity tracking technology. This technology is commonly offered as a bracelet, watch, or pendent that provides feedback of daily activity such as total step count, heart rate, and energy expenditure. Despite the popularity of these devices, their efficacy to assist in behavior change and weight loss is still being studied. The purpose of this systematic review was to appraise the current evidence on the efficacy of wearable activity devices when used in a comprehensive weigh loss program. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic review was conducted according the PRISMA guidelines. A search of electronic databases was conducted through December 2016 using the following keywords: activity monitor, consumer, wearable, technology, Fitbit®, Garmin®, Jawbone®, physical, activity, tracker, weight loss, walking, pedometer, accelerometer, step count, calories, obesity, digital, self-monitoring, and mobile health (mHealth). The grading of studies was conducted using the PEDro scale. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: We identified 7184 citations, 25 met the inclusion criteria. Twenty-one studies scored a 6 or higher and four studies scored a 5 on the PEDro scale. All subjects had a Body Mass Index (BMI) of ≥25 kg/m2 and were mostly women.
CONCLUSIONS: The results suggests that short-term (<6 months) weight loss interventions using activity trackers may be a better option than a standard weight loss program in middle age or older adults. Younger adults may not benefit from such technology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28488834     DOI: 10.23736/S0022-4707.17.07437-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Med Phys Fitness        ISSN: 0022-4707            Impact factor:   1.637


  30 in total

Review 1.  Remotely Delivered Interventions for Obesity Treatment.

Authors:  Lauren E Bradley; Christine E Smith-Mason; Joyce A Corsica; Mackenzie C Kelly; Megan M Hood
Journal:  Curr Obes Rep       Date:  2019-12

2.  Wearable Devices Are Well Accepted by Patients in the Study and Management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Survey Study.

Authors:  Robert P Hirten; Stephanie Stanley; Matteo Danieletto; Zachary Borman; Ari Grinspan; Prameela Rao; Jenny Sauk; Lin Chang; Bert Arnrich; Erwin Bӧttinger; Laurie Keefer; Bruce E Sands
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Acceptability of smokers of a conceptual cigarette tracker as wearable for smoking reduction.

Authors:  Jumana Antoun; Rana Shehab; Georges Sakr; Sani Hlais; Mariette Awad; Maya Romani
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2022-02-10

Review 4.  Use of continuous glucose monitoring in obesity research: A scoping review.

Authors:  Elizabeth Hegedus; Sarah-Jeanne Salvy; Choo Phei Wee; Monica Naguib; Jennifer K Raymond; D Steven Fox; Alaina P Vidmar
Journal:  Obes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2021-09-02       Impact factor: 5.214

Review 5.  Racial Disparities and Cardiometabolic Risk: New Horizons of Intervention and Prevention.

Authors:  Eftitan Y Akam; Akua A Nuako; Afkera K Daniel; Fatima Cody Stanford
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 5.430

6.  Effectiveness of Digital Interventions for Reducing Behavioral Risks of Cardiovascular Disease in Nonclinical Adult Populations: Systematic Review of Reviews.

Authors:  Natalie Gold; Amy Yau; Benjamin Rigby; Chris Dyke; Elizabeth Alice Remfry; Tim Chadborn
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Utilizing wearable technology to increase physical activity in future physicians: A randomized trial.

Authors:  Joanne DiFrancisco-Donoghue; Min-Kyung Jung; Alexander Stangle; William G Werner; Hallie Zwibel; Patricia Happel; Jerry Balentine
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2018-09-11

8.  I-ACT: Integrated study on effect of Activity on ComplicaTions in pregnancy: study protocol of a multiethnic prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Meijin Cai; Kok Hian Tan; Seng Bin Ang
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Comparison of On-Site Versus Remote Mobile Device Support in the Framingham Heart Study Using the Health eHeart Study for Digital Follow-up: Randomized Pilot Study Set Within an Observational Study Design.

Authors:  Jeffrey E Olgin; Joanne M Murabito; Nicole L Spartano; Honghuang Lin; Fangui Sun; Kathryn L Lunetta; Ludovic Trinquart; Maureen Valentino; Emily S Manders; Mark J Pletcher; Gregory M Marcus; David D McManus; Emelia J Benjamin; Caroline S Fox
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 4.773

10.  Long-Term Weight Management Using Wearable Technology in Overweight and Obese Adults: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Emily Fawcett; Michelle Helena Van Velthoven; Edward Meinert
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 4.773

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.