Literature DB >> 2848816

Topology of the Mr 27,000 liver gap junction protein. Cytoplasmic localization of amino- and carboxyl termini and a hydrophilic domain which is protease-hypersensitive.

E L Hertzberg1, R M Disher, A A Tiller, Y Zhou, R G Cook.   

Abstract

Hydropathy analysis of the Mr 27,000 rat liver gap junction protein sequence deduced from a cDNA clone has suggested the presence of four transmembrane segments (Paul, D. L. (1986) J. Cell Biol. 103, 123-134). In the present report, several features of the molecular topology of the protein were investigated by microsequence analysis of peptides generated by treatment of isolated gap junctions with a variety of proteases. Under the experimental conditions used, the proteases had access only to the portion of the Mr 27,000 protein that was originally (in vivo) the cytoplasmic surface of the gap junction. Microsequencing of the peptides resolved by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis indicates that the amino terminus of the protein is disposed at or near the cytoplasmic surface of the gap junction, and that this surface also contains a protease-hypersensitive hydrophilic sequence between residues 109 and 123, presumably connecting the second and third transmembrane segments. Immunocytological localization of binding of monoclonal antipeptide antibodies demonstrates that the carboxyl terminus of the protein is also localized to the cytoplasmic surface of the gap junction. No protease sensitivity was found in the hydrophilic sequences thought to connect either the first and second transmembrane segments or the third and fourth segments, supporting the model's prediction that these sequences face the narrow intercellular gap which cannot be penetrated by proteases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2848816

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  36 in total

1.  Molecular analysis of voltage dependence of heterotypic gap junctions formed by connexins 26 and 32.

Authors:  J B Rubin; V K Verselis; M V Bennett; T A Bargiello
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Mutational analysis of gap junction formation.

Authors:  G Dahl; R Werner; E Levine; C Rabadan-Diehl
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  A domain substitution procedure and its use to analyze voltage dependence of homotypic gap junctions formed by connexins 26 and 32.

Authors:  J B Rubin; V K Verselis; M V Bennett; T A Bargiello
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-05-01       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Gap junction channel gating.

Authors:  Feliksas F Bukauskas; Vytas K Verselis
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2004-03-23

Review 5.  Voltage-dependent conformational changes in connexin channels.

Authors:  Thaddeus A Bargiello; Qingxiu Tang; Seunghoon Oh; Taekyung Kwon
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2011-09-24

Review 6.  Structure of the gap junction channel and its implications for its biological functions.

Authors:  Shoji Maeda; Tomitake Tsukihara
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 7.  Life cycle of connexins in health and disease.

Authors:  Dale W Laird
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 3.857

Review 8.  The gap junction family: structure, function and chemistry.

Authors:  R Dermietzel; T K Hwang; D S Spray
Journal:  Anat Embryol (Berl)       Date:  1990

Review 9.  The life cycle of a connexin: gap junction formation, removal, and degradation.

Authors:  D W Laird
Journal:  J Bioenerg Biomembr       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.945

10.  Functional analysis of selective interactions among rodent connexins.

Authors:  T W White; D L Paul; D A Goodenough; R Bruzzone
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.138

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.