Literature DB >> 28488137

Acute effects of high-intensity interval training and moderate-intensity continuous training sessions on cardiorespiratory parameters in healthy young men.

Gustavo Zaccaria Schaun1, Cristine Lima Alberton2, Diego Oliveira Ribeiro2, Stephanie Santana Pinto2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to compare the energy expenditure (EE) during and after two treadmill protocols, high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and moderate continuous training (CONT), in young adult men.
METHODS: The sample was comprised by 26 physically active men aged between 18 and 35 years engaged in aerobic training programs. They were divided into two groups: HIIT (n = 14) which performed eight 20 s bouts at 130% of the velocity associated with the maximal oxygen consumption on a treadmill with 10 s of passive rest, or CONT (n = 12) which performed 30 min running on a treadmill at a submaximal velocity equivalent to 90-95% of the heart rate associated with the anaerobic threshold. Data related to oxygen consumption ([Formula: see text]) and EE were measured during the protocols and the excess post-exercise oxygen consumption (EPOC) was calculated for both sessions.
RESULTS: No difference was found between groups for mean [Formula: see text] (HIIT: 2.84 ± 0.46 L min-1; CONT: 2.72 ± 0.43 L min-1) and EE per minute (HIIT: 14.36 ± 2.34 kcal min-1; CONT: 13.21 ± 2.08 kcal min-1) during protocols. Regarding total EE during session, CONT resulted in higher values compared to HIIT (390.45 ± 65.15; 55.20 ± 9.33 kcal, respectively). However, post-exercise EE and EPOC values were higher after HIIT (69.31 ± 10.88; 26.27 ± 2.28 kcal, respectively) compared to CONT (55.99 ± 10.20; 13.43 ± 10.45 kcal, respectively).
CONCLUSION: These data suggest that supramaximal HIIT has a higher impact on EE and EPOC in the early phase of recovery when compared to CONT.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Continuous training; EPOC; Energy expenditure; Exercise; Interval training; Oxygen uptake

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28488137     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-017-3636-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  36 in total

1.  Effect of supramaximal exercise on excess postexercise O2 consumption.

Authors:  R Bahr; O Grønnerød; O M Sejersted
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 5.411

2.  Effect of continuous and intermittent bouts of isocaloric cycling and running exercise on excess postexercise oxygen consumption.

Authors:  Felipe A Cunha; Adrian W Midgley; Lars R McNaughton; Paulo T V Farinatti
Journal:  J Sci Med Sport       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 4.319

Review 3.  High-intensity interval training, solutions to the programming puzzle: Part I: cardiopulmonary emphasis.

Authors:  Martin Buchheit; Paul B Laursen
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  High- and moderate-intensity aerobic exercise and excess post-exercise oxygen consumption in men with metabolic syndrome.

Authors:  I Larsen; B Welde; C Martins; A E Tjønna
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 4.221

5.  Body composition from fluid spaces and density: analysis of methods. 1961.

Authors:  W E Siri
Journal:  Nutrition       Date:  1993 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.008

6.  Effect of work intensity and duration on recovery O2.

Authors:  J M Hagberg; J P Mullin; F J Nagle
Journal:  J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol       Date:  1980-03

Review 7.  Oxygen uptake kinetics.

Authors:  David C Poole; Andrew M Jones
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 9.090

8.  High-intensity interval exercise induces 24-h energy expenditure similar to traditional endurance exercise despite reduced time commitment.

Authors:  Lauren E Skelly; Patricia C Andrews; Jenna B Gillen; Brian J Martin; Michael E Percival; Martin J Gibala
Journal:  Appl Physiol Nutr Metab       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 2.665

9.  Effect of high-intensity interval exercise on lipid oxidation during postexercise recovery.

Authors:  Davide Malatesta; Catherine Werlen; Stefano Bulfaro; Xavier Chenevière; Fabio Borrani
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.411

10.  Cardiorespiratory fitness level correlates inversely with excess post-exercise oxygen consumption after aerobic-type interval training.

Authors:  Tomoaki Matsuo; Kazunori Ohkawara; Satoshi Seino; Nobutake Shimojo; Shin Yamada; Hiroshi Ohshima; Kiyoji Tanaka; Chiaki Mukai
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2012-11-21
View more
  5 in total

1.  Excess Post-Exercise Oxygen Consumption and Substrate Oxidation Following High-Intensity Interval Training: Effects of Recovery Manipulation.

Authors:  Márcio A G Sindorf; Moisés D Germano; Wellington G Dias; Danilo R Batista; Tiago V Braz; Marlene A Moreno; Charles R Lopes
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2021-10-01

2.  High-intensity resistance exercise is not as effective as traditional high-intensity interval exercise for increasing the cardiorespiratory response and energy expenditure in recreationally active subjects.

Authors:  Laura Järvinen; Sofi Lundin Petersdotter; Thomas Chaillou
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  The high-intensity interval training introduced in physical education lessons decrease systole in high blood pressure adolescents.

Authors:  Marek Popowczak; Andrzej Rokita; Dawid Koźlenia; Jarosław Domaradzki
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Compared with High-intensity Interval Exercise, Moderate Intensity Constant Load Exercise is more effective in curbing the Growth and Metastasis of Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Zhe Ge; Shan Wu; Zhengtang Qi; Shuzhe Ding
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 4.207

5.  Land vs. water HIIE effects on muscle oxygenation and physiological parameter responses in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Kuei-Yu Chien; Nai-Wen Kan; Yi-Hung Liao; Wen-Ting Yang; Yong Yang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.