Literature DB >> 28487885

Novel de novo variant in EBF3 is likely to impact DNA binding in a patient with a neurodevelopmental disorder and expanded phenotypes: patient report, in silico functional assessment, and review of published cases.

Patrick R Blackburn1,2, Sarah S Barnett3, Michael T Zimmermann4, Margot A Cousin4,5, Charu Kaiwar6,7, Filippo Pinto E Vairo4,5, Zhiyv Niu3,8, Matthew J Ferber3,5,8, Raul A Urrutia9, Duygu Selcen10, Eric W Klee3,4,5,8, Pavel N Pichurin8.   

Abstract

Pathogenic variants in EBF3 were recently described in three back-to-back publications in association with a novel neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by intellectual disability, speech delay, ataxia, and facial dysmorphisms. In this report, we describe an additional patient carrying a de novo missense variant in EBF3 (c.487C>T, p.(Arg163Trp)) that falls within a conserved residue in the zinc knuckle motif of the DNA binding domain. Without a solved structure of the DNA binding domain, we generated a homology-based atomic model and performed molecular dynamics simulations for EBF3, which predicted decreased DNA affinity for p.(Arg163Trp) compared with wild-type protein and control variants. These data are in agreement with previous experimental studies of EBF1 showing the paralogous residue is essential for DNA binding. The conservation and experimental evidence existing for EBF1 and in silico modeling and dynamics simulations to validate comparable behavior of multiple variants in EBF3 demonstrates strong support for the pathogenicity of p.(Arg163Trp). We show that our patient presents with phenotypes consistent with previously reported patients harboring EBF3 variants and expands the phenotypic spectrum of this newly identified disorder with the additional feature of a bicornuate uterus.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bicornuate uterus; congenital strabismus; downturned corners of mouth; generalized neonatal hypotonia; hydronephrosis; hydroureter; low posterior hairline; microretrognathia; moderate global developmental delay; neurogenic bladder; poor speech; recurrent urinary tract infections; short stature; urethral stricture; vesicoureteral reflux

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28487885      PMCID: PMC5411688          DOI: 10.1101/mcs.a001743

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Mol Case Stud        ISSN: 2373-2873


INTRODUCTION

The early B-cell factor 3 (EBF3) is a member of the Collier/Olf/EBF (COE) family of transcription factors that have a number of crucial developmental roles (Dubois and Vincent 2001). Recently, EBF3 was implicated in a novel neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by intellectual disability with or without central nervous system (CNS) malformations, speech delay, hypotonia, ataxia, facial dysmorphisms, and urogenital anomalies (Chao et al. 2016; Harms et al. 2016; Sleven et al. 2016). Three concurrent reports describing a total of 21 patients found several de novo heterozygous missense, nonsense, splice site, and small insertions and deletions involving EBF3 (Chao et al. 2016; Harms et al. 2016; Sleven et al. 2016). Interestingly, all of the missense variants that were identified fell within the highly conserved DNA binding domain (DBD) of EBF3; four had de novo missense variants within a single codon resulting in mutation of the p.Arg163 residue (Chao et al. 2016; Sleven et al. 2016). This residue falls within the “zinc knuckle” motif, is conserved across human EBF paralogs (EBF1-4), and has a crucial role in coordinating DNA binding (Hagman et al. 1995; Fields et al. 2008). Functional analysis of EBF1 p.Arg163Ala showed loss of DNA binding (Treiber et al. 2010). Functional studies of EBF3 variants affecting p.Arg163 have confirmed the essential role of this residue (Chao et al. 2016; Sleven et al. 2016). The EBF3 Arg163 codon falls within a CpG dinucleotide island, which could explain why it likely represents a mutation hotspot for this novel disorder (Chao et al. 2016). EBF3 binds to DNA as a homodimer but can also heterodimerize with other EBF family members to transactivate target genes (Green and Vetter 2011a). Studies of mutant/wild-type (wt) EBF3 heterodimers show that amino acid substitutions at critical residues could exert a dominant-negative effect, thereby reducing DNA binding and subsequent transcriptional activation (Sleven et al. 2016). In this report, we describe another patient with a novel heterozygous c.487C>T (p.(Arg163Trp)) variant in EBF3 who has significant clinical overlap with other previously described patients. We compare the clinical manifestations of our patient with those of previously reported individuals and also provide structural evidence supporting pathogenicity of the novel c.487C>T (p.(Arg163Trp)) variant found in this case.

RESULTS

Clinical Presentation and Family History

The proband was the product of an uncomplicated pregnancy, delivered at term to a G3P2, 31-yr-old mother and 34-yr-old father. She was noted at birth to have a markedly distended abdomen and was not voiding appropriately. A blind-end dimple was noted at the expected location of urethra and catheterization could not be performed. A percutaneous suprapubic cystoscopy was performed and vaginoscopy demonstrated a normal vagina and cervix with a bicornuate uterus. Urethral meatal stenosis was noted and the urethra was subsequently dilated. The suprapubic tube was removed but she had failed voiding trials, prompting vesicostomy and a diagnosis of atonic bladder. During her evaluation at ∼2 yr of age, she had generalized hypotonia with global developmental delay; she sat independently at 1 yr, was not yet walking at 2 yr, and had a two- to three-word vocabulary. There was no evidence of ataxia or dystonia; deep tendon reflexes were reported decreased throughout. She had bilateral esotropia, short stature with height less than the second percentile, and weight and head circumference around the 25th percentile for age. On exam, she was grossly nondysmorphic, with downturned mouth corners, mild retrognathia, a low posterior hairline, and mild pectus excavatum (Fig. 1). She had normal evaluations that included brain and total spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), electromyography (EMG), chromosomal microarray, and comprehensive biochemical metabolic testing. There were no other family members with a similar constellation of findings; however, her mother and maternal grandmother were reported to have strabismus. The proband has two older maternal half-siblings including a sister with a history of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and a brother with ADHD and history of speech delay.
Figure 1.

Patient photographs showing front and side views. The proband was noted to have mild dysmorphic features including bilateral esotropia, retrognathia, downturned corners of the mouth, and a low posterior hairline.

Patient photographs showing front and side views. The proband was noted to have mild dysmorphic features including bilateral esotropia, retrognathia, downturned corners of the mouth, and a low posterior hairline.

Genomic Analyses

To identify variants of interest, whole-exome sequencing was performed on genomic DNA extracted from samples submitted from the proband, biological mother, and biological father; 97% of the exome-capture region was covered at a read depth of 20× or greater. A de novo variant (c.487C>T, p.(Arg163Trp)) was identified in EBF3, which was considered a gene of uncertain significance at the time of analysis (Table 1). This variant was reported due to EBF3 being implicated as part of the critical region in the 10q26 microdeletion syndrome, which has features overlapping the clinical phenotype of the proband (Faria et al. 2016). In silico analyses predicted that this alteration was deleterious, probably damaging, and disease-causing by SIFT (Sorting Intolerant from Tolerant), PolyPhen-2, and MutationTaster2, respectively (Kumar et al. 2009; Adzhubei et al. 2010; Schwarz et al. 2014). This variant has not been reported in the literature or in publically available databases including the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) and the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD) (Lek et al. 2016). EBF3 is highly intolerant to both missense and loss-of-function variation, and the residue mutated in our patient is conserved across species and paralogs (Fig. 2). Targeted Sanger sequencing (forward 5′-ACAACAAATGGTGCAATGCACA-3′, reverse 5′-AAAATACAAGTCGGGCATAAAAGGG-3′) was used to confirm the variant in the proband and absence of the alteration in parental samples.
Table 1.

Variant Information

Position (hg19/GRCh37)TypeGeneHGVS cDNAHGVS proteinZygosityInheritanceSIFT/PolyPhen-2/MutationTaster2ExAC/gnomAD allele frequency
Chr10:131755589G>AMissenseEBF3NM_001005463.2c.487C>TNP_001005463.1p.(Arg163Trp)HetDe novoDeleterious/probably damaging/disease-causingN/R

HGVS, Human Genome Variation Society; SIFT, Sorting Intolerant from Tolerant; ExAC, Exome Aggregation Consortium; N/R, not reported.

Figure 2.

Schematic diagram of EBF3 (NP_001005463.1) protein structure. Numbering corresponds to amino acids.

Schematic diagram of EBF3 (NP_001005463.1) protein structure. Numbering corresponds to amino acids. Variant Information HGVS, Human Genome Variation Society; SIFT, Sorting Intolerant from Tolerant; ExAC, Exome Aggregation Consortium; N/R, not reported.

Phenotypic Analyses of Patients with EBF3 Variants

Comparison of our patient with other recently reported cases with variants affecting the p.Arg163 residue revealed substantial phenotypic overlap (Table 2). All patients had intellectual disability, global developmental delay, speech delay, mild facial dysmorphisms, strabismus, and some urogenital anomaly, such as micropenis, cryptorchidism, urinary retention/reflux, and/or bladder control issues (Table 2). Several structural brain abnormalities were noted in other patients on MRI, but this was not a consistent feature across all patients, including the patient described in this report. Our patient also had several urogenital anomalies including atonic bladder, distal urethral stricture, vesicoureteral reflux, bilateral hydroureter and hydronephrosis, and recurrent urinary tract infections (UTIs). Recurrent UTIs have been described in several other patients, possibly suggestive of underlying urogenital malformations, but only one other patient with a c.512G>A (p.(Gly171Asp)) variant has been described who had a diagnosis of atonic bladder (Harms et al. 2016). Our patient also had a bicornuate uterus, which has not been reported in any other patients with EBF3 intragenic variants, suggesting that this may represent an additional feature associated with this novel disorder.
Table 2.

Clinical summary of the patient described in this report and previously reported patients with variants affecting the Arg163 residue

Variant in EBF3Chr10: 131755589G>A (hg19); NM_001005463.2; c.487C>T; p.(Arg163Trp)Chr10: 131755588C>T (hg19); NM_001005463.2; c.488G>A; p.(Arg163Gln)Chr10: 131755588C>T (hg19); NM_001005463.2; c.488G>A; p.(Arg163Gln)Chr10: 131755588C>A (hg19); NM_001005463.2; c.488G>T; p.(Arg163Leu)Chr10: 131755588C>G (hg19); NM_001005463.2; c.488G>C; p.(Arg163Pro)
ReferenceThis reportChao et al. 2016Chao et al. 2016Chao et al. 2016Sleven et al. 2016
InheritanceDe novoDe novoDe novoDe novoDe novo
SexFemaleMaleFemaleFemaleMale
EthnicityIrish, Mexican, German, and French descentPacific Islander of Chinese and Japanese descentAfrican–AmericanEnglish, Irish, German, and Polish descentEnglish descent
Age at most recent assessment23 mo7 yr5 yr3 yr13 yr
BirthBirth was at term by vaginal delivery and was significant for meconium aspiration and distended bladder requiring catheterizationBirth was at 38 wk gestation by repeat Caesarean section and was significant for a loose nuchal cord wrapped around the neck and a fractured claviclePatient's prenatal history is significant for decreased fetal movements, and birth was at 40 wk via induced vaginal delivery for oligohydramniosBirth was at 39 wk of gestation by Caesarean section because of breech positionBirth was at 38 wk by elective Caesarian section because of breech position
Birth weight in grams3490 g3400 g3350 g2700 g3200 g
Birth length in cm49.5 cm52 cm50.8 cmN/RN/R
OFC at birth in cmN/R36.2 cm33.5 cmN/RN/R
Weight in kg (percentile)10.6 kg (30th percentile) at 23 mo19.5 kg (25th percentile)17.5 kg (41st percentile)10th percentileN/R
Height in cm (percentile)71 cm (<2nd percentile) at 23 mo109.7 cm (25th percentile)114.8 cm (91st percentile)10th percentile132.5cm (<1st percentile) at 13 yr
OFC in cm (percentile)46.7 cm (30th percentile) at 23 mo52.5 cm (50th–75th percentile)51 cm (85th percentile)20th percentile56.2 cm (50th–75th percentile) at 13 yr
Intellectual disability+++++
Global developmental
delay+++++
Speech delay+++++
Hypotonia+++++
AtaxiaNot present at time of evaluationGait ataxiaGait ataxia, dysmetriaGait ataxiaGait and truncal ataxia
SeizuresN/RN/RN/RN/RN/R
Brain MRI findingsBrain MRI revealed no abnormalitiesBrain MRI (performed at 7 yr of age) revealed small inferior posterior cerebellar lobes, hypoplasia of the posterior vermis, and mild prominence of the ventricles and sulciBrain MRI (performed at 18 mo of age) revealed hypoplasia of the anterior and posterior vermis, overfolding of the superior helices, with normal cerebellar hemispheresBrain MRI (performed at 1 yr of age) showed normal cerebellar vermis and hemispheresBrain imaging studies (performed at age 1 and 5) revealed cerebellar cleft or absent vermis, cerebellar atrophy, and atrophy of pontine tegmentum
Facial dysmorphismsLow posterior hairline, down- turned mouth corners, and mild retrognathiaMyopathic facies and short anteverted nostrilsTriangular-shaped faciesTriangular-shaped faciesDolichocephaly, prominent forehead and occiput, and deep-set eyes
StrabismusBilateral esotropia+++Esotropia
EarsEars neutrally set and well formedOverfolding of the superior helicesOverfolding of the superior helicesN/RN/R
Urogenital anomaliesBilateral hydroureter and hydronephrosis after birth due to extreme urinary retention/atonic bladder, vesicoureteral reflux (vesicostomy was performed), distal urethral stricture, recurrent urinary tract infections, bicornate uterusMicropenis and cryptorchidismMild reduction in volume of the labia majora, lacks bladder controlUrinary retention associated with incomplete bladder emptying and grade 1 urinary refluxLeft cryptorchidism
Additional clinical findingsPatient has generalized low muscle tone with a normal EMG study with no evidence for myopathy, defect in neuromuscular transmission, or peripheral neuropathy, deep tendon reflexes were decreased (−2/−3 in upper and lower), normal spinal MRI, mild pectus excavatum, uses two to three words purposefullyClinical features include facial weakness, expressive speech disorder, dysarthria, dysphagia, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and hockey-stick palmar creasesPatient's clinical features include facial weakness, abnormal palmar creases, fifth-finger clinodactyly, expressive speech disorder, apraxia, dysarthria, dysphagia, and perseverative social behaviors. Patient also has marked insensitivity to painPatient's clinical features include facial weakness, expressive speech disorder, dysphagia, motor stereotypies, small feet, and torticollis. Patient speaks only one word, did not walk until late, and has a pincer grasp. Patient also has marked insensitivity to painPatient's clinical features include pectus excavatum, tapering fingers, pes planus, shortened great toes, dysarthria, and high-pitched voice. The patient stood with support at 2 yr of age, walked independently at 5 yr and 8 mo, has limited speech (50 words), and an IQ of 71.
Functional evidenceNot doneActivation of COE-binding sequence reporter-gene was assessed in vitro as the ratio of NanoLuc to firefly luciferase. A 92-fold induction was observed with wt EBF3. EBF3 p.Arg163Gln showed a very poor induction of transcription and was indistinguishable from the negative control.Activation of COE-binding sequence reporter-gene was assessed in vitro as the ratio of NanoLuc to firefly luciferase. A 92-fold induction was observed with wt EBF3. EBF3 p.Arg163Gln showed a very poor induction of transcription and was indistinguishable from the negative control.Activation of COE-binding sequence reporter-gene was assessed in vitro as the ratio of NanoLuc to firefly luciferase. A 92-fold induction was observed with wt EBF3. EBF3 p.Arg163Leu had only a 45-fold induction, suggesting that the variant is a hypomorphic alteration.Used μM2.21 cell system to measure the relative transactivation abilities of mutant and wild-type EBF3 proteins across graded levels of expression (assay measures the percentage of surface mIgM expression as a direct readout of EBF3 function). The p.Arg163Pro variant was inactive across all expression levels, suggesting that mutation of this residue ablates EBF3 function.

N/R, not reported; +, present; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; EMG, electromyography; COE, Collier/Olf/EBF; wt, wild type; EBF3, early B-cell factor 3.

Clinical summary of the patient described in this report and previously reported patients with variants affecting the Arg163 residue N/R, not reported; +, present; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; EMG, electromyography; COE, Collier/Olf/EBF; wt, wild type; EBF3, early B-cell factor 3.

Molecular Modeling and Dynamics Simulations Demonstrate Loss of DNA Binding for p.(Arg163Trp)

In this study, we used molecular modeling and physics-based atomic simulation to investigate the effects of p.(Arg163Trp) on DNA binding. Previous work in the EBF3 human paralog EBF1 has demonstrated experimentally that p.Arg163 contacts DNA, intercalating into the minor grove, and that both p.Arg163Trp and p.Arg163Ala lead to loss of DNA binding. Additionally, p.Lys239Ala interacts with DNA, but mutation to alanine had no effect on binding (Treiber et al. 2010). Thus, we generated triplicate simulation of EBF3 dimers bound to DNA for all four sequence contexts: wt, p.Lys239Ala, p.Arg163Trp, and p.Arg163Ala. Simulations revealed consistent increases in EBF3 dynamics for p.Arg163Ala and p.Arg163Trp, whereas p.Lys239Ala exhibited wt-like behavior (Fig. 3). The increased dynamics is due to loss of DNA contact by the zinc knuckle domain (see Supplemental Animation 1), which leads to greater deviations from the native conformation (Supplemental Fig. S1). To quantify the departure of the zinc knuckle from the DNA minor grove, we measured reference distances between the protein and DNA backbone. These distances are significantly and consistently longer for both p.Arg163 variants (see Fig. 3; Supplemental Fig. S2), whereas the wt and p.Lys239Ala remain stable. MD simulations capture both the short-scale random atomic fluctuations and the large-scale motions of the protein. We applied principal component (PC) analysis to our simulation data to identify the large-scale motions therein. We summarized these large-scale motions of EBF3, revealing that loss of contact between the zinc knuckle and DNA leads to large-scale conformations changes characterized by pivoting of EBF3 around the DNA helix axis (Supplemental Fig. S3). Thus, atomic simulations of EBF3 variants agree with biochemical experiments performed for EBF1 and indicate that p.(Arg163Trp) is likely to lead to loss of DNA affinity.
Figure 3.

p.Arg163Trp induces dynamic changes throughout EBF3 that are comparable to the validated pathogenic p.Arg163Ala and distinct from control simulations. (A) We calculated the average root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) across replicates for each simulation condition (indicated by color). Proteins with alterations at residue 163 demonstrated increased mobility throughout both monomers (indicated by light and dark gray rectangles along the abscissa) with the greatest differences among the DNA-interacting regions (black rectangles) around p.Arg163. (B) To quantify the differences between conformations, we measured the distance from residue 163 (violet sphere) to nearby phosphate atoms in the DNA backbone (orange spheres). (C) We show a comparison using one of these reference distances (larger sphere in B), demonstrating that both the wild-type (wt) and p.Lys239Ala retain stable DNA interactions, whereas both p.Arg163Ala and p.Arg163Trp lose contact with DNA. Additional distance measures are presented in Supplemental Figure S2.

p.Arg163Trp induces dynamic changes throughout EBF3 that are comparable to the validated pathogenic p.Arg163Ala and distinct from control simulations. (A) We calculated the average root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) across replicates for each simulation condition (indicated by color). Proteins with alterations at residue 163 demonstrated increased mobility throughout both monomers (indicated by light and dark gray rectangles along the abscissa) with the greatest differences among the DNA-interacting regions (black rectangles) around p.Arg163. (B) To quantify the differences between conformations, we measured the distance from residue 163 (violet sphere) to nearby phosphate atoms in the DNA backbone (orange spheres). (C) We show a comparison using one of these reference distances (larger sphere in B), demonstrating that both the wild-type (wt) and p.Lys239Ala retain stable DNA interactions, whereas both p.Arg163Ala and p.Arg163Trp lose contact with DNA. Additional distance measures are presented in Supplemental Figure S2.

DISCUSSION

EBF3 is one of four highly related transcription factors in the COE family found in humans. EBF3 is composed of an amino-terminal DBD, an Ig-like/plexins/transcription factors (IPT) domain, a helix–loop–helix (HLH) domain, and a carboxy-terminal domain (Fig. 2; Liberg et al. 2002). The DBD coordinates a zinc ion through a histidine and three cysteine residues that form a 14-residue zinc knuckle motif that is essential for DNA binding (Hagman et al. 1995; Liberg et al. 2002). In humans, there is 97% homology at the amino acid level between EBF1 and EBF3 within the DBD, which suggests that these related proteins have similar DNA-binding properties (Dubois and Vincent 2001). In this report, we describe a patient with a novel p.(Arg163Trp) missense mutation that falls within a highly conserved residue in the zinc knuckle motif. Molecular modeling as well as functional confirmation in patients (see Table 2 for description of functional studies performed) with other variants affecting the p.Arg163 residue, strongly suggest that the variant found in our patient is pathogenic. In addition, our patient showed extensive phenotypic overlap with recently reported patients (Chao et al. 2016; Harms et al. 2016; Sleven et al. 2016). Our patient had several urogenital abnormalities, including a bicornuate uterus, which has not been described in any other patients to date and may represent an expansion of the known phenotype. EBF3 has been less well studied than other EBF family members, but is known to be expressed in early post-mitotic neurons during development and plays a role in neurogenesis (Garel et al. 1997). In invertebrate model organisms, the EBF3 orthologs collier in Drosophila melanogaster and unc-3 (CeO/E) in Caenorhabditis elegans are expressed in mandibular and intercalary segment primordia during head specification in flies (Crozatier et al. 1996; 1999) as well as in chemosensory and developing motor neurons during axonal outgrowth in worms (Prasad et al. 1998). Studies in Xenopus revealed that EBF3 ortholog (Xebf3) is activated by XNeuroD and is expressed in primary neurons where it regulates neuronal differentiation (Pozzoli et al. 2001). At the transcriptional level in Xenopus, xebf2 and xebf3 appear to have largely overlapping patterns of expression and may have partially redundant functions (Green and Vetter 2011a). This appears to be supported by the fact that Ebf2 and Ebf3 knockout mice as well as Ebf2/3 double heterozygous knockout mice have similar phenotypes with defects in neuronal development and olfactory axon growth (Wang et al. 2004). In mice, Ebf3 is also expressed in Cajal–Retzius (CR) cells, which are important for the development of the cerebral cortex (Chiara et al. 2012). Together, Ebf2 and Ebf3 appear to regulate the migration of CR cells arising in the cortical hem during corticogenesis, and disruption of these genes leads to defects in neuronal development (Chiara et al. 2012). Gene expression profiling comparing Arx mutant and E14.5 wild-type ventral telencephalic tissues in mice revealed that Ebf3 is one of the most differentially expressed genes in Arx mutant ganglionic eminences where it is not typically expressed (Colasante et al. 2009). Arx encodes the Aristaless-related homeobox protein, which is an essential transcription factor involved in patterning, neuronal proliferation and differentiation, and axonal outgrowth (Friocourt and Parnavelas 2010). Arx has been shown to be sufficient to repress Ebf3 expression, and defects in neuronal development in Arx mutant mice can be partially rescued through Ebf3 silencing (Colasante et al. 2009). Interestingly, pathogenic variants in ARX result in a number of developmental disorders in humans including lissencephaly (LISX2; MIM# 300215), Proud syndrome (MIM# 300004), infantile spasms without brain malformations (EIEE1; MIM# 308350), and syndromic (MIM# 309510) and nonsyndromic (MIM# 300419) mental retardation (Friocourt and Parnavelas 2010). Patients with ARX-related disorders that have CNS malformations can also present with urogenital anomalies, suggesting that the expression patterns of EBF3 and ARX are both antagonistic and tightly regulated in a number of different tissues (Friocourt and Parnavelas 2010). Prior to recent reports, EBF3 had not been implicated definitively in any disorder in humans. However, patients with 10q26 microdeletion syndrome that includes a 3.5 Mb minimally deleted region (SROII) involving EBF3 have several overlapping clinical features with individuals carrying EBF3 intragenic variants, including short stature, craniofacial dysmorphisms, strabismus, abnormal ears, genital anomalies, urinary tract anomalies, CNS malformations, microcephaly, and intellectual disability (Faria et al. 2016). As in ARX-related disorders, variants in EBF3 are associated with marked phenotypic and clinical heterogeneity, with some patients presenting with structural brain abnormalities and others having no evidence of CNS malformations.

EBF3 Is Expressed in Skeletal Muscle and Is Involved in Muscle Development and Muscle-Specific Transcription

Outside of the CNS, Ebf3 shows the highest expression levels in the diaphragm, bone marrow, and skeletal muscle in developing mouse embryos (Jin et al. 2014). Adult mice express Ebf3 at the highest levels in skeletal muscle, the uterus, the eye, and the diaphragm (Jin et al. 2014). In Drosophila, collier is expressed in muscle progenitors and is required for myoblast fusion (Crozatier et al. 1999). Similarly in Xenopus, Ebf2 and Ebf3 are expressed in muscle and are required for somite organization, migration of hypaxial muscle anlagen, and the development of jaw muscle (Green and Vetter 2011b). MyoD and Myf5 appear to be direct targets of these transcription factors (Green and Vetter 2011b). MyoD can also up-regulate the expression of Ebf genes, suggestive of a positive feedback loop between Ebf and MyoD that is necessary for differentiation of muscle cells in Xenopus (Green and Vetter 2011b). Ebf3 knockout mice die of respiratory failure before postnatal day 2 because of failure of the lung to unfold (Jin et al. 2014). This lethal phenotype is caused by a hypercontractile diaphragm with impaired Ca2+ efflux due to down-regulation of Serca1 (Atp2a1) in the absence of Ebf3 (Jin et al. 2014). EBF3 has been shown to bind to the promoter of Atp2a1 and synergizes with MYOD to induce expression of other muscle-specific target genes (Jin et al. 2014). Ebf3 is also expressed in the urogenital tract of developing mice, including regions that correspond to the detrusor muscle of the bladder and the muscle layer of the pelvic urethra (Supplemental Fig. S4) (McMahon et al. 2008; Harding et al. 2011). Given its role in muscle development and contraction, it is possible that disruption of EBF3-mediated transcription in muscle could lead to hypotonia, atonic bladder/loss of bladder control, and other phenotypes observed in patients with pathogenic EBF3 variants. Further studies will be essential to unraveling the role of EBF3 in the expression of disease in humans.

METHODS

Sample Collection and WES

Whole-exome sequencing was performed on genomic DNA extracted from all samples submitted. The exome was captured utilizing a custom reagent developed by the Mayo Clinic and Agilent Technologies, targeting 19,456 genes and 187,715 exons using 637,923 probes to capture a 54.1 Mbp total region. Sequencing was performed on an Illumina HiSeq 2500 Next-Generation sequencing instrument, using HapMap Sample NA12878 as an internal control. Paired-end 101-bp reads were aligned to a modified human reference genome (GRCh37/hg19) using Novoalign (Novocraft Technologies). Sequencing quality was evaluated using FastQC (www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/). All germline variants were jointly called through GATK Haplotype Caller and GenotypeGVCF (McKenna et al. 2010). Each variant was annotated using the BioR Toolkit (Kocher et al. 2014) and subsequently evaluated for clinical relevance. Sequencing results are shown in Table 3.
Table 3.

Sequencing summary

10× CoverageMean coverageYield (Gb)>Q30 (%)Mean QFiltered variantsEBF3 mean exon coverageVariant coverage
98.63%140×15.399.9238.4057511772×379

Q30, quality score of 30; EBF3, early B-cell factor 3.

Sequencing summary Q30, quality score of 30; EBF3, early B-cell factor 3.

Molecular Modeling and Molecular Dynamics Simulations

Our modeling and analysis began from the UniProt sequence of EBF3 (also known as COE3), Q9H4W6, which is 97% identical to EBF1 across its DNA binding domain (Goujon et al. 2010). The initial configuration of our structure was generated using homology modeling from the crystal structure of EBF1 dimer bound to DNA, 3MLP (Treiber et al. 2010), using Modeller (Martí-Renom et al. 2000) and an automated modeling approach (Zhi et al. 2014). All-atom implicit environment configurations were generated using VMD (Humphrey et al. 1996). Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were carried out using NAMD (Phillips et al. 2005) and the CHARMM36 force field (Best et al. 2012; Hart et al. 2012). Triplicate simulations for each variant were independently energy minimized for 10,000 steps, followed by heating to 300 K over 600 ps via a Langevin thermostat and equilibration for 1ns, with a simulation time step of 1fs and conformations recorded every 2 ps. A further 5 ns of simulation trajectory was generated for analysis. Prior to analysis, all trajectories were aligned to the initial wt conformation using DNA backbone atoms. Principal component (PC) analysis was performed in Cartesian space on protein Cα atoms. Analysis was carried out using custom scripts, leveraging VMD and the Bio3D R package (Grant et al. 2006). Protein structure visualization was performed in PyMOL version 1.7.6. (PyMOL 2010) and VMD v1.9.3.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Data Deposition and Access

Whole-exome sequencing data is not publicly available because patient consent could not be obtained. The variant has been submitted to ClinVar (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/) under accession number SCV000493129.

Ethics Statement

The proband and/or parents were consented for sample collection and subsequent analysis under a protocol approved by the institutional review board of the Mayo Clinic. Written informed consent was obtained from the proband's parents for publication and accompanying images.

Acknowledgments

We thank the patient and her family for participating in this study.

Author Contributions

P.R.B., S.S.B., M.T.Z., E.W.K., and P.N.P. designed the study. P.R.B., S.S.B., M.T.Z., M.A.C., C.K., F.P.V., Z.N., M.J.F., R.A.U., D.S., E.W.K., and P.N.P. gathered the data. P.R.B., M.T.Z., and E.W.K. analyzed the data. P.R.B., S.S.B., M.T.Z., E.W.K, and P.N.P. wrote the paper.

Funding

We thank the Mayo Clinic Center for Individualized Medicine (CIM) for supporting this research through the CIM Investigative and Functional Genomics Program.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Referees

Kerstin Kutsche Peter N. Robinson
  37 in total

Review 1.  The EBF/Olf/Collier family of transcription factors: regulators of differentiation in cells originating from all three embryonal germ layers.

Authors:  David Liberg; Mikael Sigvardsson; Peter Akerblad
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Structure of an Ebf1:DNA complex reveals unusual DNA recognition and structural homology with Rel proteins.

Authors:  Nora Treiber; Thomas Treiber; Georg Zocher; Rudolf Grosschedl
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  A new bioinformatics analysis tools framework at EMBL-EBI.

Authors:  Mickael Goujon; Hamish McWilliam; Weizhong Li; Franck Valentin; Silvano Squizzato; Juri Paern; Rodrigo Lopez
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-05-03       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Mutations in ARX Result in Several Defects Involving GABAergic Neurons.

Authors:  Gaëlle Friocourt; John G Parnavelas
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 5.505

5.  Optimization of the additive CHARMM all-atom protein force field targeting improved sampling of the backbone φ, ψ and side-chain χ(1) and χ(2) dihedral angles.

Authors:  Robert B Best; Xiao Zhu; Jihyun Shim; Pedro E M Lopes; Jeetain Mittal; Michael Feig; Alexander D Mackerell
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 6.006

6.  Craniosynostosis in 10q26 deletion patients: A consequence of brain underdevelopment or altered suture biology?

Authors:  Ágatha Cristhina Faria; Eliete Rabbi-Bortolini; Maria R G O Rebouças; Andréia L A de S Thiago Pereira; Milena G Tonini Frasson; Rodrigo Atique; Naila Cristina V Lourenço; Carla Rosenberg; Gerson S Kobayashi; Maria Rita Passos-Bueno; Flávia Imbroisi Valle Errera
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 2.802

7.  The GUDMAP database--an online resource for genitourinary research.

Authors:  Simon D Harding; Chris Armit; Jane Armstrong; Jane Brennan; Ying Cheng; Bernard Haggarty; Derek Houghton; Sue Lloyd-MacGilp; Xingjun Pi; Yogmatee Roochun; Mehran Sharghi; Christopher Tindal; Andrew P McMahon; Brian Gottesman; Melissa H Little; Kylie Georgas; Bruce J Aronow; S Steven Potter; Eric W Brunskill; E Michelle Southard-Smith; Cathy Mendelsohn; Richard A Baldock; Jamie A Davies; Duncan Davidson
Journal:  Development       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 6.868

8.  The Biological Reference Repository (BioR): a rapid and flexible system for genomics annotation.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre A Kocher; Daniel J Quest; Patrick Duffy; Michael A Meiners; Raymond M Moore; David Rider; Asif Hossain; Steven N Hart; Valentin Dinu
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  EBF contains a novel zinc coordination motif and multiple dimerization and transcriptional activation domains.

Authors:  J Hagman; M J Gutch; H Lin; R Grosschedl
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1995-06-15       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  A novel reannotation strategy for dissecting DNA methylation patterns of human long intergenic non-coding RNAs in cancers.

Authors:  Hui Zhi; Shangwei Ning; Xiang Li; Yuyun Li; Wei Wu; Xia Li
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  8 in total

1.  Phenotype comparison confirms ZMYND11 as a critical gene for 10p15.3 microdeletion syndrome.

Authors:  Birute Tumiene; Ž Čiuladaitė; E Preikšaitienė; R Mameniškienė; A Utkus; V Kučinskas
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Neuroimaging Findings in Patients with EBF3 Mutations: Report of Two Cases.

Authors:  Mar Jiménez de la Peña; Ana Jiménez de Domingo; Pilar Tirado; Beatriz Calleja-Pérez; Luis A Alcaraz; Sara Álvarez; Jonathan Williams; James R Hagman; Andrea H Németh; Alberto Fernández-Jaén
Journal:  Mol Syndromol       Date:  2021-04-09

3.  In Vivo Functional Study of Disease-associated Rare Human Variants Using Drosophila.

Authors:  J Michael Harnish; Samantha L Deal; Hsiao-Tuan Chao; Michael F Wangler; Shinya Yamamoto
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  An ancient role for collier/Olf/Ebf (COE)-type transcription factors in axial motor neuron development.

Authors:  Catarina Catela; Edgar Correa; Kailong Wen; Jihad Aburas; Laura Croci; G Giacomo Consalez; Paschalis Kratsios
Journal:  Neural Dev       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 3.842

5.  Molecular modeling of LDLR aids interpretation of genomic variants.

Authors:  Eric W Klee; Michael T Zimmermann
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 4.599

6.  Impact of integrated translational research on clinical exome sequencing.

Authors:  Margot A Cousin; Filippo Pinto E Vairo; Joel A Morales-Rosado; Erica L Macke; Eric W Klee; W Garrett Jenkinson; Alejandro Ferrer; Laura E Schultz-Rogers; Rory J Olson; Gavin R Oliver; Ashley N Sigafoos; Tanya L Schwab; Michael T Zimmermann; Raul A Urrutia; Charu Kaiwar; Aditi Gupta; Patrick R Blackburn; Nicole J Boczek; Carri A Prochnow; Rebecca J Lowy; Lindsay A Mulvihill; Tammy M McAllister; Stacy L Aoudia; Teresa M Kruisselbrink; Lauren B Gunderson; Jennifer L Kemppainen; Laura J Fisher; Jessica M Tarnowski; Megan M Hager; Sarah A Kroc; Nicole L Bertsch; Katherine E Agre; Jessica L Jackson; Sarah K Macklin-Mantia; Marine I Murphree; Laura M Rust; Jolene M Summer Bolster; Scott A Beck; Paldeep S Atwal; Marissa S Ellingson; Sarah S Barnett; Kristen J Rasmussen; Carrie A Lahner; Zhiyv Niu; Linda Hasadsri; Matthew J Ferber; Cherisse A Marcou; Karl J Clark; Pavel N Pichurin; David R Deyle; Eva Morava-Kozicz; Ralitza H Gavrilova; Radhika Dhamija; Klaas J Wierenga; Brendan C Lanpher; Dusica Babovic-Vuksanovic; Gianrico Farrugia; Lisa A Schimmenti; A Keith Stewart; Konstantinos N Lazaridis
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 8.822

7.  De novo variants in EBF3 are associated with hypotonia, developmental delay, intellectual disability, and autism.

Authors:  Akemi J Tanaka; Megan T Cho; Rebecca Willaert; Kyle Retterer; Yuri A Zarate; Katie Bosanko; Vikki Stefans; Kimihiko Oishi; Amy Williamson; Golder N Wilson; Alice Basinger; Tina Barbaro-Dieber; Lucia Ortega; Susanna Sorrentino; Melissa K Gabriel; Ilse J Anderson; Maria J Guillen Sacoto; Rhonda E Schnur; Wendy K Chung
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Mol Case Stud       Date:  2017-11-21

8.  Establishment and maintenance of motor neuron identity via temporal modularity in terminal selector function.

Authors:  Yinan Li; Anthony Osuma; Edgar Correa; Munachiso A Okebalama; Pauline Dao; Olivia Gaylord; Jihad Aburas; Priota Islam; André Ex Brown; Paschalis Kratsios
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 8.140

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.