| Literature DB >> 28487821 |
Felix J Brandenburg1, Tomohiro Okamoto1, Hiroshi Saito1, Benjamin Leuschel2, Olivier Soppera2, Takashi Yatsui1.
Abstract
Surface flattening techniques are extremely important for the development of future electrical and/or optical devices because carrier-scattering losses due to surface roughness severely limit the performance of nanoscale devices. To address the problem, we have developed a near-field etching technique that provides selective etching of surface protrusions, resulting in an atomically flat surface. To achieve finer control, we examine the importance of the wavelength of the near-field etching laser. Using light sources at wavelengths of 325 and 405 nm, which are beyond the absorption edge of the photoresist (310 nm), we compare the resulting cross-sectional etching volumes. The volumes were larger when 325 nm light was employed, i.e., closer to the absorption edge. Although 405 nm light did not cause structural change in the photoresist, a higher reduction of the surface roughness was observed as compared to the 325 nm light. These results indicate that even wavelengths above 325 nm can cause surface roughness improvements without notably changing the structure of the photoresist.Entities:
Keywords: near-field etching; organic photoresists; surface improvement; wavelength dependence
Year: 2017 PMID: 28487821 PMCID: PMC5389175 DOI: 10.3762/bjnano.8.81
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Beilstein J Nanotechnol ISSN: 2190-4286 Impact factor: 3.649
Figure 1AFM images of the photoresist after 120 min of near-field etching with a He–Cd laser (325 nm, 3.81 eV) ((a) before and (b) after) and a GaN laser (405 nm; 3.06 eV) ((c) before and (d) after). (e) and (f) provide details of (c) and (d) respectively at the same positions (white dashed line).
Figure 2(a) Photoresist profile before (black) and after 60 min (blue) and 120 min (red) of 325 nm laser illumination under room conditions. (b) Same as (a) but with 405 nm laser illumination.
Figure 3(a) Evaluation of surface roughness reduction of 325 nm (purple) and 405 nm (blue) over a 2 h interval. (b) Showing the cross-sectional etching volume. A comparison of the etching volumes of 325 nm (purple) and 405 nm (blue) over a 2 h interval.
Figure 4Absorption spectrum and cross-sectional profile. (a) Photoresist absorption curve, showing that 325 nm and 405 nm are not directly being absorbed by the photoresist. (b) Near-field etching for 120 min with 325 nm He–Cd laser, repeated under a low-oxygen environment.