Literature DB >> 28487294

The effect of variation in donor platelet function on transfusion outcome: a semirandomized controlled trial.

Anne M Kelly1, Stephen F Garner1,2, Theodora Foukaneli2, Thomas R Godec3, Nina Herbert1, Brennan C Kahan4, Alison Deary2, Lekha Bakrania2, Charlotte Llewelyn2, Willem H Ouwehand1,2, Lorna M Williamson1,2, Rebecca A Cardigan1,2.   

Abstract

The effect of variation in platelet function in platelet donors on patient outcome following platelet transfusion is unknown. This trial assessed the hypothesis that platelets collected from donors with highly responsive platelets to agonists in vitro assessed by flow cytometry (high-responder donors) are cleared more quickly from the circulation than those from low-responder donors, resulting in lower platelet count increments following transfusion. This parallel group, semirandomized double-blinded trial was conducted in a single center in the United Kingdom. Eligible patients were those 16 or older with thrombocytopenia secondary to bone marrow failure, requiring prophylactic platelet transfusion. Patients were randomly assigned to receive a platelet donation from a high- or low-responder donor when both were available, or when only 1 type of platelet was available, patients received that. Participants, investigators, and those assessing outcomes were masked to group assignment. The primary end point was the platelet count increment 10 to 90 minutes following transfusion. Analysis was by intention to treat. Fifty-one patients were assigned to receive platelets from low-responder donors, and 49 from high-responder donors (47 of which were randomized and 53 nonrandomized). There was no significant difference in platelet count increment 10 to 90 minutes following transfusion in patients receiving platelets from high-responder (mean, 21.0 × 109/L; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.9-37.2) or low-responder (mean, 23.3 × 109/L; 95% CI, 7.8-38.9) donors (mean difference, 2.3; 95% CI, -1.1 to 5.7; P = .18). These results support the current policy of not selecting platelet donors on the basis of platelet function for prophylactic platelet transfusion.
© 2017 by The American Society of Hematology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28487294     DOI: 10.1182/blood-2017-01-759258

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  4 in total

1.  Effect of Pneumatic Tubing System Transport on Platelet Apheresis Units.

Authors:  Jevgenia Zilberman-Rudenko; Frank Z Zhao; Stephanie E Reitsma; Annachiara Mitrugno; Jiaqing Pang; Joseph J Shatzel; Beth Rick; Christina Tyrrell; Wohaib Hasan; Owen J T McCarty; Martin A Schreiber
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 2.495

2.  Evaluation of the in vitro Function of Platelet Concentrates from Pooled Buffy Coats or Apheresis.

Authors:  Sarah Anna Fiedler; Klaus Boller; Ann-Christine Junker; Christel Kamp; Anneliese Hilger; Wolfgang Schwarz; Rainer Seitz; Ursula Salge-Bartels
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 3.747

3.  Routine Screening Method for Microparticles in Platelet Transfusions.

Authors:  Daniel Millar; Larry Murphy; Audrey Labrie; Elisabeth Maurer-Spurej
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  Screening platelet function in blood donors.

Authors:  Pascal Pedini; Jean-Baptiste Baudey; Katia Pouymayou; Celine Falaise; Manal Ibrahim-Kosta; Melanie Vélier; Clémence Demerle; Hajer Graiet; Catherine Dragutini; Anne-Marie Dombey; Jacques Chiaroni; Marie Christine Alessi; Christophe Picard
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 3.337

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.