Mee Kyoung Kim1, Jee Sun Jeong1, Hyuk-Sang Kwon1, Ki Hyun Baek1, Ki-Ho Song2. 1. Department of Internal Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Internal Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: kihos@catholic.ac.kr.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The hemoglobin glycation index (HGI) is an index of differences in the glycation of hemoglobin according to blood glucose level. The glycation gap (G-gap) is an empiric measure of the extent of disagreement between hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C) and glycated albumin (GA). The aim of this study was to investigate the extent of agreement between the HGI and G-gap with respect to GA level, and to elucidate factors related to a high HGI. METHOD: Data were obtained from 105 patients with type 2 diabetes, and fasting blood glucose (FBG), HbA1c, and GA values were measured simultaneously. The G-gap was calculated as the difference between the measured and GA-based predicted HbA1c levels. HGI was calculated as the difference between measured and FBG-based predicted HbA1c levels. RESULTS: The HGI and G-gap were highly correlated according GA (r=0.722, P<0.001). In general, the two indices were similar in terms of both direction and magnitude. The classification of patients as high, moderate, or low glycators based on HGI versus G-gap was consistent for the majority of the population and only 5% of patients were reclassified from high to low or low to high. Fasting C-peptide levels decreased linearly, and the percentage of patients using insulin increased linearly, between the lowest and highest HGI tertile (both P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: There was 95% agreement between the HGI and G-gap using GA among type 2 diabetes patients. Furthermore, a high HGI was associated with a higher prevalence of insulin use among type 2 diabetes patients.
BACKGROUND: The hemoglobin glycation index (HGI) is an index of differences in the glycation of hemoglobin according to blood glucose level. The glycation gap (G-gap) is an empiric measure of the extent of disagreement between hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C) and glycated albumin (GA). The aim of this study was to investigate the extent of agreement between the HGI and G-gap with respect to GA level, and to elucidate factors related to a high HGI. METHOD: Data were obtained from 105 patients with type 2 diabetes, and fasting blood glucose (FBG), HbA1c, and GA values were measured simultaneously. The G-gap was calculated as the difference between the measured and GA-based predicted HbA1c levels. HGI was calculated as the difference between measured and FBG-based predicted HbA1c levels. RESULTS: The HGI and G-gap were highly correlated according GA (r=0.722, P<0.001). In general, the two indices were similar in terms of both direction and magnitude. The classification of patients as high, moderate, or low glycators based on HGI versus G-gap was consistent for the majority of the population and only 5% of patients were reclassified from high to low or low to high. Fasting C-peptide levels decreased linearly, and the percentage of patients using insulin increased linearly, between the lowest and highest HGI tertile (both P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: There was 95% agreement between the HGI and G-gap using GA among type 2 diabetespatients. Furthermore, a high HGI was associated with a higher prevalence of insulin use among type 2 diabetespatients.
Authors: Daniel S Hsia; Neda Rasouli; Anastassios G Pittas; Christine W Lary; Anne Peters; Michael R Lewis; Sangeeta R Kashyap; Karen C Johnson; Erin S LeBlanc; Lawrence S Phillips; James M Hempe; Cyrus V Desouza Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2020-03-01 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Justin A Edward; Kevin Josey; Gideon Bahn; Liron Caplan; Jane E B Reusch; Peter Reaven; Debashis Ghosh; Sridharan Raghavan Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol Date: 2022-04-27 Impact factor: 8.949