Steven Skitch1, Benjamin Tam2, Michael Xu3, Laura McInnis4, Anthony Vu4, Alison Fox-Robichaud2. 1. *Division of Emergency Medicine,McMaster University,Hamilton General Hospital,Hamilton,ON. 2. †Division of Critical Care,McMaster University,Hamilton General Hospital,Hamilton,ON. 3. ‡Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact,McMaster University,Hamilton General Hospital,Hamilton,ON. 4. §Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine,McMaster University,Hamilton General Hospital,Hamilton,ON.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Early warning scores use vital signs to identify patients at risk of critical illness. The current study examines the Hamilton Early Warning Score (HEWS) at emergency department (ED) triage among patients who experienced a critical event during their hospitalization. HEWS was also evaluated as a predictor of sepsis. METHODS: The study population included admissions to two hospitals over a 6-month period. Cases experienced a critical event defined by unplanned intensive care unit admission, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, or death. Controls were randomly selected from the database in a 2-to-1 ratio to match cases on the burden of comorbid illness. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate HEWS as a predictor of the likelihood of critical deterioration and sepsis. RESULTS: The sample included 845 patients, of whom 270 experienced a critical event; 89 patients were excluded because of missing vitals. An ROC analysis indicated that HEWS at ED triage had poor discriminative ability for predicting the likelihood of experiencing a critical event 0.62 (95% CI 0.58-0.66). HEWS had a fair discriminative ability for meeting criteria for sepsis 0.77 (95% CI 0.72-0.82) and good discriminative ability for predicting the occurrence of a critical event among septic patients 0.82 (95% CI 0.75-0.90). CONCLUSION: This study indicates that HEWS at ED triage has limited utility for identifying patients at risk of experiencing a critical event. However, HEWS may allow earlier identification of septic patients. Prospective studies are needed to further delineate the utility of the HEWS to identify septic patients in the ED.
OBJECTIVES: Early warning scores use vital signs to identify patients at risk of critical illness. The current study examines the Hamilton Early Warning Score (HEWS) at emergency department (ED) triage among patients who experienced a critical event during their hospitalization. HEWS was also evaluated as a predictor of sepsis. METHODS: The study population included admissions to two hospitals over a 6-month period. Cases experienced a critical event defined by unplanned intensive care unit admission, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, or death. Controls were randomly selected from the database in a 2-to-1 ratio to match cases on the burden of comorbid illness. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate HEWS as a predictor of the likelihood of critical deterioration and sepsis. RESULTS: The sample included 845 patients, of whom 270 experienced a critical event; 89 patients were excluded because of missing vitals. An ROC analysis indicated that HEWS at ED triage had poor discriminative ability for predicting the likelihood of experiencing a critical event 0.62 (95% CI 0.58-0.66). HEWS had a fair discriminative ability for meeting criteria for sepsis 0.77 (95% CI 0.72-0.82) and good discriminative ability for predicting the occurrence of a critical event among septic patients 0.82 (95% CI 0.75-0.90). CONCLUSION: This study indicates that HEWS at ED triage has limited utility for identifying patients at risk of experiencing a critical event. However, HEWS may allow earlier identification of septic patients. Prospective studies are needed to further delineate the utility of the HEWS to identify septic patients in the ED.
Entities:
Keywords:
early warning scores; emergency department; sepsis; triage
Authors: Safiah H C Mai; Neha Sharma; Andrew C Kwong; Dhruva J Dwivedi; Momina Khan; Peter M Grin; Alison E Fox-Robichaud; Patricia C Liaw Journal: Intensive Care Med Exp Date: 2018-07-27
Authors: Shannon M Fernando; Alison E Fox-Robichaud; Bram Rochwerg; Pierre Cardinal; Andrew J E Seely; Jeffrey J Perry; Daniel I McIsaac; Alexandre Tran; Steven Skitch; Benjamin Tam; Michael Hickey; Peter M Reardon; Peter Tanuseputro; Kwadwo Kyeremanteng Journal: Crit Care Date: 2019-02-21 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Jaskirat Arora; Jennifer A Klowak; Sameer Parpia; Marcelo Zapata-Canivilo; Walaa Faidi; Christopher Skappak; Rachael Gregoris; Colin A Kretz; Dhruva J Dwivedi; Kerstin de Wit; Michelle Welsford; Alison Fox-Robichaud Journal: Crit Care Explor Date: 2021-04-26