PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of topography-guided corneal collagen cross-linking (TG-CXL) to conventional corneal CXL (C-CXL) in progressive keratoconus. METHODS: In this prospective, nonrandomized clinical trial, 60 eyes of 60 patients were scheduled to receive either TG-CXL (30 eyes with deepithelialization focused on the cone, riboflavin application for 10 minutes, and 30 mW/cm2 pulsed ultraviolet-A irradiance pattern according to topography) or C-CXL (30 eyes treated in accordance with the Dresden protocol). Patients were observed for 1 year postoperatively. Maximum keratometry (Kmax), mean keratometry in the inferior part of the cornea (I index), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), demarcation line observed in optical coherence tomography, and nerves and cell densities analyzed by confocal microscopy were compared preoperatively and at 1 year postoperatively. RESULTS: The difference was significant for both Kmax (P < .01) and I index (P < .01) between the two groups. CDVA improved significantly in the TG-CXL (0.2162 ± 0.2495 logMAR, P < .05) versus the C-CXL (0.2648 ± 0.2574 logMAR, P = .104) group. A stromal demarcation line was observed in both treatment groups, with similar depth at the top of the cone (P = .391), but it was shallower at the surrounding area in the TG-CXL group (P < .0001). Stromal evaluation by confocal microscopy showed less damage and faster healing in the surrounding area than on the cone area in the TG-CXL group. CONCLUSIONS: At 1 year postoperatively, TG-CXL seems to be as safe as C-CXL with stronger flattening in Kmax and I index and better improvement in CDVA. TG-CXL induces a biological gradient between the cone and the surrounding area that facilitates nerve and cell recovery. [J Refract Surg. 2017;33(5):290-297.]. Copyright 2017, SLACK Incorporated.
PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of topography-guided corneal collagen cross-linking (TG-CXL) to conventional corneal CXL (C-CXL) in progressive keratoconus. METHODS: In this prospective, nonrandomized clinical trial, 60 eyes of 60 patients were scheduled to receive either TG-CXL (30 eyes with deepithelialization focused on the cone, riboflavin application for 10 minutes, and 30 mW/cm2 pulsed ultraviolet-A irradiance pattern according to topography) or C-CXL (30 eyes treated in accordance with the Dresden protocol). Patients were observed for 1 year postoperatively. Maximum keratometry (Kmax), mean keratometry in the inferior part of the cornea (I index), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), demarcation line observed in optical coherence tomography, and nerves and cell densities analyzed by confocal microscopy were compared preoperatively and at 1 year postoperatively. RESULTS: The difference was significant for both Kmax (P < .01) and I index (P < .01) between the two groups. CDVA improved significantly in the TG-CXL (0.2162 ± 0.2495 logMAR, P < .05) versus the C-CXL (0.2648 ± 0.2574 logMAR, P = .104) group. A stromal demarcation line was observed in both treatment groups, with similar depth at the top of the cone (P = .391), but it was shallower at the surrounding area in the TG-CXL group (P < .0001). Stromal evaluation by confocal microscopy showed less damage and faster healing in the surrounding area than on the cone area in the TG-CXL group. CONCLUSIONS: At 1 year postoperatively, TG-CXL seems to be as safe as C-CXL with stronger flattening in Kmax and I index and better improvement in CDVA. TG-CXL induces a biological gradient between the cone and the surrounding area that facilitates nerve and cell recovery. [J Refract Surg. 2017;33(5):290-297.]. Copyright 2017, SLACK Incorporated.
Authors: Bernardo T Lopes; Prema Padmanabhan; Ashkan Eliasy; Haixia Zhang; Ahmed Abass; Ahmed Elsheikh Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol Date: 2022-06-08