T Aoyama1, K Nishikawa2, K Fujitani3, K Tanabe4, S Ito5, T Matsui6, A Miki7, H Nemoto8, K Sakamaki9, T Fukunaga10, Y Kimura11, N Hirabayashi12, T Yoshikawa1. 1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama. 2. Department of Surgery, Osaka National Hospital. 3. Osaka General Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Osaka, Japan. 4. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima. 5. Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center, Nagoya. 6. Department of Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Aichi Hospital, Okazaki. 7. Department of Surgery, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe. 8. Department of Surgery, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital, Yokohama. 9. Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama. 10. Department of Surgery, Saint Marianna University, Kawasaki. 11. Department of Surgery, Sakai City Hospital, Sakai. 12. Department of Surgery, Hiroshima City Asa Citizens Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is a promising method of improving the survival of resectable gastric cancer. Cisplatin/S-1 (CS) and docetaxel/cisplatin/S-1 (DCS) are both effective against metastatic gastric cancer. This report clarified the impact of these regimens on early endpoints, including the pathological responses, chemotherapy-related toxicities, and surgical results. METHODS: Patients with M0 and either T4 or T3 in case of junctional cancer or scirrhous type received two or four courses of cisplatin (60 mg/m2 at day 8)/S-1 (80 mg/m2 for 21 days with 1 week rest) or docetaxel (40 mg/m2 at day 1)/cisplatin (60 mg/m2 at day 1)/S-1 (80 mg/m2 for 14 days with 2 weeks rest) as NAC. Patients then underwent D2 gastrectomy and adjuvant S-1 chemotherapy for 1 year. The primary endpoint was the 3-year overall survival. RESULTS: Between October 2011 and September 2014, 132 patients were assigned to receive CS (n = 66; 33 in 2 courses and 33 in 4 courses) or DCS (n = 66; 33 in 2 courses and 33 in 4 courses). The respective major grade 3 or 4 hematological toxicities (CS/DCS) were leukocytopenia (14.1%/26.2%), neutropenia (29.7%/47.7%), anemia (14.1%/12.3%), and platelet reduction (3.1%/1.5%). The rate of pathological response, defined as a complete response or < 10% residual cancer remaining, was 19.4% in the CS group and 15.4% in the DCS group, and 15.6% in the two-course group and 19.0% in the 4-course group. The R0 resection rate was 72.7% in the CS group and 81.8% in the DCS group and 80.3% in the two-course group and the 74.2% in the four-course group. No treatment-related deaths were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Our results do not support three-drug therapy with a taxane over two-drug therapy, or any further treatment beyond two cycles as an attractive candidate for the test arm of NAC.
BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is a promising method of improving the survival of resectable gastric cancer. Cisplatin/S-1 (CS) and docetaxel/cisplatin/S-1 (DCS) are both effective against metastatic gastric cancer. This report clarified the impact of these regimens on early endpoints, including the pathological responses, chemotherapy-related toxicities, and surgical results. METHODS: Patients with M0 and either T4 or T3 in case of junctional cancer or scirrhous type received two or four courses of cisplatin (60 mg/m2 at day 8)/S-1 (80 mg/m2 for 21 days with 1 week rest) or docetaxel (40 mg/m2 at day 1)/cisplatin (60 mg/m2 at day 1)/S-1 (80 mg/m2 for 14 days with 2 weeks rest) as NAC. Patients then underwent D2 gastrectomy and adjuvant S-1 chemotherapy for 1 year. The primary endpoint was the 3-year overall survival. RESULTS: Between October 2011 and September 2014, 132 patients were assigned to receive CS (n = 66; 33 in 2 courses and 33 in 4 courses) or DCS (n = 66; 33 in 2 courses and 33 in 4 courses). The respective major grade 3 or 4 hematological toxicities (CS/DCS) were leukocytopenia (14.1%/26.2%), neutropenia (29.7%/47.7%), anemia (14.1%/12.3%), and platelet reduction (3.1%/1.5%). The rate of pathological response, defined as a complete response or < 10% residual cancer remaining, was 19.4% in the CS group and 15.4% in the DCS group, and 15.6% in the two-course group and 19.0% in the 4-course group. The R0 resection rate was 72.7% in the CS group and 81.8% in the DCS group and 80.3% in the two-course group and the 74.2% in the four-course group. No treatment-related deaths were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Our results do not support three-drug therapy with a taxane over two-drug therapy, or any further treatment beyond two cycles as an attractive candidate for the test arm of NAC.
Authors: Katrin Bose; Caspar Franck; Meike N Müller; Ali Canbay; Alexander Link; Marino Venerito Journal: Gastroenterol Res Pract Date: 2017-07-13 Impact factor: 2.260
Authors: Tom van den Ende; Frank A Abe Nijenhuis; Héctor G van den Boorn; Emil Ter Veer; Maarten C C M Hulshof; Suzanne S Gisbertz; Martijn G H van Oijen; Hanneke W M van Laarhoven Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2019-07-25 Impact factor: 6.244