Katja Ten Cate1, Donald G van Tol2, Suzanne van de Vathorst1,3. 1. Department of General Practice, section Medical Ethics, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 2. Department of General Practice, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Medical Ethics and Philosophy, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Abstract
Background: In the Netherlands, euthanasia or assisted suicide (EAS) is neither a right of the patient nor a duty of the physician. Beside the legal requirements, physicians can weigh their own considerations when they decide on a request for EAS. Objective: We aim at a better understanding of the considerations that play a role when physicians decide on a request for EAS. Methods: This was a qualitative study. We analysed 33 interviews held with general practitioners (GPs) from various regions in the Netherlands. Results: The considerations found can be divided in three main types. (i) Perceived legal criteria, (ii) individual interpretations of the legal criteria and (iii) considerations unrelated to the legal criteria. Considerations of this 3rd type have not been mentioned so far in the literature and the debate on EAS. Examples are: the family should agree to EAS, the patient's attitude must reflect resignation, or conflicts must be resolved. Conclusions: Our study feeds the ethical discussion on the tension that can arise between a physician's own views on death and dying, and the views and preferences of his patients. When considerations like 'no unresolved conflicts' or 'enough resignation' influence the decision to grant a request for EAS this poses questions from an ethical and professional point of view. We hypothesise that these considerations reflect GPs' views on what 'good dying' entails and we advocate further research on this topic.
Background: In the Netherlands, euthanasia or assisted suicide (EAS) is neither a right of the patient nor a duty of the physician. Beside the legal requirements, physicians can weigh their own considerations when they decide on a request for EAS. Objective: We aim at a better understanding of the considerations that play a role when physicians decide on a request for EAS. Methods: This was a qualitative study. We analysed 33 interviews held with general practitioners (GPs) from various regions in the Netherlands. Results: The considerations found can be divided in three main types. (i) Perceived legal criteria, (ii) individual interpretations of the legal criteria and (iii) considerations unrelated to the legal criteria. Considerations of this 3rd type have not been mentioned so far in the literature and the debate on EAS. Examples are: the family should agree to EAS, the patient's attitude must reflect resignation, or conflicts must be resolved. Conclusions: Our study feeds the ethical discussion on the tension that can arise between a physician's own views on death and dying, and the views and preferences of his patients. When considerations like 'no unresolved conflicts' or 'enough resignation' influence the decision to grant a request for EAS this poses questions from an ethical and professional point of view. We hypothesise that these considerations reflect GPs' views on what 'good dying' entails and we advocate further research on this topic.
Authors: Marianne C Snijdewind; Jos de Keijser; Gerty Casteelen; Paul A Boelen; Geert E Smid Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2022-07-08 Impact factor: 5.435