Literature DB >> 28486217

Fully automated treatment planning for head and neck radiotherapy using a voxel-based dose prediction and dose mimicking method.

Chris McIntosh1, Mattea Welch, Andrea McNiven, David A Jaffray, Thomas G Purdie.   

Abstract

Recent works in automated radiotherapy treatment planning have used machine learning based on historical treatment plans to infer the spatial dose distribution for a novel patient directly from the planning image. We present a probabilistic, atlas-based approach which predicts the dose for novel patients using a set of automatically selected most similar patients (atlases). The output is a spatial dose objective, which specifies the desired dose-per-voxel, and therefore replaces the need to specify and tune dose-volume objectives. Voxel-based dose mimicking optimization then converts the predicted dose distribution to a complete treatment plan with dose calculation using a collapsed cone convolution dose engine. In this study, we investigated automated planning for right-sided oropharaynx head and neck patients treated with IMRT and VMAT. We compare four versions of our dose prediction pipeline using a database of 54 training and 12 independent testing patients by evaluating 14 clinical dose evaluation criteria. Our preliminary results are promising and demonstrate that automated methods can generate comparable dose distributions to clinical. Overall, automated plans achieved an average of 0.6% higher dose for target coverage evaluation criteria, and 2.4% lower dose at the organs at risk criteria levels evaluated compared with clinical. There was no statistically significant difference detected in high-dose conformity between automated and clinical plans as measured by the conformation number. Automated plans achieved nine more unique criteria than clinical across the 12 patients tested and automated plans scored a significantly higher dose at the evaluation limit for two high-risk target coverage criteria and a significantly lower dose in one critical organ maximum dose. The novel dose prediction method with dose mimicking can generate complete treatment plans in 12-13 min without user interaction. It is a promising approach for fully automated treatment planning and can be readily applied to different treatment sites and modalities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28486217     DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa71f8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  24 in total

Review 1.  Automation in intensity modulated radiotherapy treatment planning-a review of recent innovations.

Authors:  Mohammad Hussein; Ben J M Heijmen; Dirk Verellen; Andrew Nisbet
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Automatic replanning of VMAT plans for different treatment machines: A template-based approach using constrained optimization.

Authors:  Luise A Künzel; Oliver S Dohm; Markus Alber; Daniel Zips; Daniela Thorwarth
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  An atlas-based method to predict three-dimensional dose distributions for cancer patients who receive radiotherapy.

Authors:  S A Yoganathan; Rui Zhang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Investigation of clinical target volume segmentation for whole breast irradiation using three-dimensional convolutional neural networks with gradient-weighted class activation mapping.

Authors:  Megumi Oya; Satoru Sugimoto; Keisuke Sasai; Kazuhito Yokoyama
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2021-06-16

Review 5.  Big Data in Head and Neck Cancer.

Authors:  Carlo Resteghini; Annalisa Trama; Elio Borgonovi; Hykel Hosni; Giovanni Corrao; Ester Orlandi; Giuseppina Calareso; Loris De Cecco; Cesare Piazza; Luca Mainardi; Lisa Licitra
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2018-10-25

6.  Deep learning-based inverse mapping for fluence map prediction.

Authors:  Lin Ma; Mingli Chen; Xuejun Gu; Weiguo Lu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 7.  Artificial intelligence and machine learning for medical imaging: A technology review.

Authors:  Ana Barragán-Montero; Umair Javaid; Gilmer Valdés; Dan Nguyen; Paul Desbordes; Benoit Macq; Siri Willems; Liesbeth Vandewinckele; Mats Holmström; Fredrik Löfman; Steven Michiels; Kevin Souris; Edmond Sterpin; John A Lee
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2021-05-09       Impact factor: 2.685

Review 8.  Applications and limitations of machine learning in radiation oncology.

Authors:  Daniel Jarrett; Eleanor Stride; Katherine Vallis; Mark J Gooding
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 3.629

9.  Individualized automated planning for dose bath reduction in robotic radiosurgery for benign tumors.

Authors:  Linda Rossi; Alejandra Méndez Romero; Maaike Milder; Erik de Klerck; Sebastiaan Breedveld; Ben Heijmen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Artificial Intelligence in Radiotherapy Treatment Planning: Present and Future.

Authors:  Chunhao Wang; Xiaofeng Zhu; Julian C Hong; Dandan Zheng
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-01-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.