Literature DB >> 28485474

Graphene and carbon nanotubes activate different cell surface receptors on macrophages before and after deactivation of endotoxins.

Mohamed H Lahiani1,2, Kuppan Gokulan1, Katherine Williams1, Mariya V Khodakovskaya2,3, Sangeeta Khare1.   

Abstract

Nanomaterial synthesis and handling in a non-sterile environment can result in the final product becoming contaminated with bacterial endotoxin or lipopolysaccharides (LPB). During toxicological testing, the effects caused by endotoxin-contaminated nanomaterials can be misinterpreted in the end-point analysis (such as cytotoxicity and immune responses) and could result in erroneous conclusions. The objective of this study was twofold: (i) to test different carbon-based nanomaterials (CBNs) [pristine graphene and multi-wall carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs)] for the presence of endotoxin and develop strategies for depyrogenation, and (ii) to compare the immune response exhibited by macrophages after exposure to native CBNs versus depyrogenated CBNs. The gel-clot limulus amebocyte lysate (LAL) and chromogenic-based LAL assays were used to detect endotoxins. Results revealed that the CBNs contained greater amounts of endotoxin than are approved by major regulatory agencies (0.5 EU ml-1 ). Three repeated cycles of autoclaving reduced the endotoxin in the test materials. Macrophages were incubated with pyrogenated and depyrogenated pristine graphene and MWCNTs to test differences in phagocytosis, cytotoxicity, and expression of genes involved in macrophage activation. The uptake of depyrogenated CBNs was significantly reduced as compared with pyrogenated CBNs. Exposure of macrophages to depyrogenated CBNs resulted in a distinct pattern of gene expression for TLR signaling, NOD-like receptor signaling, and downstream signal transduction molecules. Furthermore, macrophages exposed to both types of CBNs showed the downregulation of TLR5 and NLRC4 inflammasomes. The results of this study reaffirm that assessment of endotoxin and other bacterial contamination is critical when evaluating the cellular toxicity of nanomaterials. Published 2017. This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA. Published 2017. This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA. Published 2017. This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  LAL assay; carbon nanotubes; cell surface receptor; cytotoxicity; endotoxin; graphene; macrophages

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28485474     DOI: 10.1002/jat.3477

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Toxicol        ISSN: 0260-437X            Impact factor:   3.446


  10 in total

Review 1.  Toxicology data of graphene-family nanomaterials: an update.

Authors:  Feng Xiaoli; Chen Qiyue; Guo Weihong; Zhang Yaqing; Hu Chen; Wu Junrong; Shao Longquan
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 5.153

Review 2.  Nanoparticle Effects on Stress Response Pathways and Nanoparticle-Protein Interactions.

Authors:  Shana J Cameron; Jessica Sheng; Farah Hosseinian; William G Willmore
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 3.  Biocompatibility of nanomaterials and their immunological properties.

Authors:  Themis R Kyriakides; Arindam Raj; Tiffany H Tseng; Hugh Xiao; Ryan Nguyen; Farrah S Mohammed; Saiti Halder; Mengqing Xu; Michelle J Wu; Shuozhen Bao; Wendy C Sheu
Journal:  Biomed Mater       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 3.715

Review 4.  Graphene and the Immune System: A Romance of Many Dimensions.

Authors:  Sourav P Mukherjee; Massimo Bottini; Bengt Fadeel
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 7.561

5.  Effects of carbon-based nanomaterials on seed germination, biomass accumulation and salt stress response of bioenergy crops.

Authors:  Kamal Pandey; Mohamed H Lahiani; Victoria K Hicks; M Keith Hudson; Micah J Green; Mariya Khodakovskaya
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Improvement of Commercially Valuable Traits of Industrial Crops by Application of Carbon-based Nanomaterials.

Authors:  Kamal Pandey; Muhammad Anas; Victoria K Hicks; Micah J Green; Mariya V Khodakovskaya
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Interaction of Graphene Oxide Modified with Linear and Branched PEG with Monocytes Isolated from Human Blood.

Authors:  Pavel Khramtsov; Maria Bochkova; Valeria Timganova; Anton Nechaev; Sofya Uzhviyuk; Kseniya Shardina; Irina Maslennikova; Mikhail Rayev; Svetlana Zamorina
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 5.076

8.  Ex Vivo Human Colon Tissue Exposure to Pristine Graphene Activates Genes Involved in the Binding, Adhesion and Proliferation of Epithelial Cells.

Authors:  Mohamed H Lahiani; Kuppan Gokulan; Katherine Williams; Sangeeta Khare
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-10-23       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 9.  Immunotoxicity of Carbon-Based Nanomaterials, Starring Phagocytes.

Authors:  Tereza Svadlakova; Drahomira Holmannova; Martina Kolackova; Andrea Malkova; Jan Krejsek; Zdenek Fiala
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 6.208

10.  miR221 regulates cell migration by targeting annexin a1 expression in human mesothelial MeT-5A cells neoplastic-like transformed by multi-walled carbon nanotube.

Authors:  Li Ju; Lijin Zhu; Hao Wu; Min Yu; Xianhong Yin; Zhenyu Jia; Lingfang Feng; Shibo Ying; Hailing Xia; Shuzhi Zhang; Jianlin Lou; Jun Yang
Journal:  Genes Environ       Date:  2021-08-02
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.