| Literature DB >> 28485382 |
Chansavath Phetsouphanh1, Yin Xu1, Mee Ling Munier1, John J Zaunders1,2, Anthony D Kelleher1,2.
Abstract
Recent studies of protein and gene expression at the single-cell level have revealed that the memory T-cell compartment is more heterogeneous than previously acknowledged. Identifying different T helper subsets involved in memory responses at the single-cell level is thus necessary to understand the level of heterogeneity within this population. Antigen-specific CD4+ T cells were measured using the CD25/OX40 assay together with a qualitative multiplex single-cell RT-PCR assay. Transcription profiles and subset proportions within the antigen-specific CD4+ T-cell population were dissected. Cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific CD4+ T-cell responses skewed toward a Th1 response, whereas Tetanus toxoid responses skewed toward a Th2 type response. Fluctuations in CD4+ T-cell subsets were observed within the HIV-Gag-specific response during ongoing antiretroviral therapy. Strong effector responses (Th1) were observed in early treatment, however with ongoing therapy this effector response significantly decreased in combination with an increase in Tregs and circulating Tfh-like BCL-6+ memory cells. The apparent increase in Tcm in peripheral blood after a several weeks of antiretroviral therapy may be due to Tfh-like cell egress from germinal centers into the periphery.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28485382 PMCID: PMC5550558 DOI: 10.1038/icb.2017.28
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Immunol Cell Biol ISSN: 0818-9641 Impact factor: 5.126
Figure 1Transcription factor (TF) profiles from CMV- and TT-specific CD4 T cells in healthy subjects. (a) CMV-specific TF profile n=9. (b) TT-specific TF profile n=7. Black columns represent single TF expressed within one cell. Dark blue segment of the pie slice is indicative of single cells that expressed more than one TF. Differing combinations of TF were expressed in these cells; no cell expressed all five TFs. Shaded columns represent combinations of multiple TF expression. Larger pie chart shows column results as percentages. Smaller pie chart represents multiple TF expression as percentages. (c) Intracellular TF staining in CMV- and TT-specific CD4+ T cells from healthy controls. (d) CMV-specific TF profile in HIV-positive subjects at week 2 post ART (percentages shown as medians). (e) Tbet protein expression in CMV-specific CD4+ T cells from healthy, chronically infected ART-treated patients and LTNP. (f) FoxP3 protein expression in CMV-specific CD4+ T cells from healthy, chronically infected and LTNP subjects.
Figure 2Transcription factor (TF)profiles from Gag-specific CD4 T cells in HIV-positive subjects in late treatment and LTNP. (a) Gag-specific TF profile in chronic early treatment week 2 n=6. (b) Gag-specific TF profile in chronic late treatment week 48 n=4. (c) Gag-specific TF profile LTNP n=6. Longitudinal TF expression in chronic subjects compared to LTNP: Tbet (d), Foxp3 (e) and BCL-6 (f). (g) Effector memory (Tem) percentages post ART at week 2 and week 48 in chronic HIV-infected subjects. (h) Central memory (Tcm) dynamics post ART.
CD4 T-cell count, plasma VL of HIV-positive subjects
| 1 | 126 | 4.12 | 390 | 1.7 | ||
| 2 | 143 | 3.88 | 255 | 1.7 | ||
| 3 | 160 | 5.83 | 315 | 1.7 | ||
| 4 | 104 | 4.98 | 288 | 1.7 | ||
| 5 | 102 | 5.82 | 252 | 1.7 | ||
| 6 | 88 | 3.99 | 336 | 1.7 | ||
| 7 | 77 | 5.56 | 255 | 1.7 | ||
| 8 | 48 | 5.0 | 231 | 1.7 | ||
| 9 | 104 | 5.84 | 315 | 1.7 | ||
| 10 | 756 | 1.7 | ||||
| 11 | 1260 | 2.26 | ||||
| 12 | 1134 | 1.7 | ||||
| 13 | 891 | 1.7 | ||||
| 14 | 980 | 1.7 | ||||
| Mean | 106 | 5.00 | 293 | 1.7 | 1004 | 1.81 |
Abbreviations: LTNP, long-term non-progressor; VL, viral load.
Patients 1–9 are chronic HIV-1-infected subjects at early and late treatment time points. Patients 10–14 are LTNP subjects.