| Literature DB >> 28485254 |
Anne-Catrin Adam1, Kai K Lie1, Mari Moren1, Kaja H Skjærven1.
Abstract
This study explores the effect of high dietary arachidonic acid (ARA) levels (high ARA) compared with low dietary ARA levels (control) on the general metabolism using zebrafish as the model organism. The fatty acid composition of today's 'modern diet' tends towards higher n-6 PUFA levels in relation to n-3 PUFA. Low dietary n-3:n-6 PUFA ratio is a health concern, as n-6 PUFA give rise to eicosanoids and PG, which are traditionally considered pro-inflammatory, especially when derived from ARA. Juvenile zebrafish fed a high-ARA diet for 17 d had a lower whole-body n-3:n-6 PUFA ratio compared with zebrafish fed a low-ARA (control) diet (0·6 in the control group v. 0·2 in the high-ARA group). Metabolic profiling revealed altered levels of eicosanoids, PUFA, dicarboxylic acids and complex lipids such as glycerophospholipids and lysophospholipids as the most significant differences compared with the control group. ARA-derived hydroxylated eicosanoids, such as hydroxy-eicosatetraenoic acids, were elevated in response to high-ARA feed. In addition, increased levels of oxidised lipids and amino acids indicated an oxidised environment due to n-6 PUFA excess in the fish. To conclude, our results indicate that an ARA-enriched diet induces changes in complex lipids and immune-related eicosanoids and increases levels of oxidised lipids and amino acids, suggesting oxidative stress and lipid peroxidation.Entities:
Keywords: 4-HNE 4-hydroxy-nonenal; ARA arachidonic acid; HETE hydroxy-eicosatetraenoic acids; Arachidonic acid; Eicosanoids; Metabolomics; Oxidative stress; Zebrafish
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28485254 PMCID: PMC5481881 DOI: 10.1017/S0007114517000903
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Nutr ISSN: 0007-1145 Impact factor: 3.718
Feed composition
| Ingredients | Control (g/kg DM) | High-ARA (g/kg DM) |
|---|---|---|
| Protein blend | 767·9 | 767·9 |
| Agar | 1·0 | 1·0 |
| Fish oil | 8·0 | 8·0 |
| Rape seed oil | 48·0 | 20·0 |
| Flax seed oil | 20·0 | 4·0 |
| Cargill’s ARA-rich oil | 4·0 | 48·0 |
| Dextrin | 46·17 | 46·17 |
| Cellulose | 19·3 | 19·3 |
| Lecithin | 20·0 | 20·0 |
| Mineral mix | 50·0 | 50·0 |
| Vitamin mix | 10·0 | 10·0 |
| Methionine | 2·5 | 2·5 |
| Cyanocobalamin(1 %) | 0·99998 | 0·99998 |
| Folic acid (97 %) | 0·0111 | 0·0111 |
| Pyridoxine hydrochloride | 0·0199 | 0·0199 |
| Astaxanthin | 0·3 | 0·3 |
| Sucrose | 1·0 | 1·0 |
| Tocopherol mix | 0·75 | 0·75 |
ARA, arachidonic acid.
BioMar AS products: fishmeal, 5 %; krill meal, 1 %; soya protein concentrate, 6·2 %; maize, 5 %; wheat, 7·5 %; wheat gluten, 13 %; pea protein, 49·8 %; field peas, 12·5 %.
Dissolved in 200 ml heated Milli-Q water; Sigma Aldrich Norway AS.
Cod liver oil; Møllers, Axellus AS.
Rømer Produkt.
Donated by Cargill (40 % ARA; Alking Bioengineering).
Sigma-Aldrich.
Alfa Aesar.
Merck; ingredients (g/kg of diet): CaHPO4·2H2O, 30; CoCl2·6H2O, 0·007; CuSO4·5H2O, 0·02; K2SO4, 15; KI, 0·05; MgSO4·7H2O, 5; MnSO4·H2O, 0·05; NaCl, 2·873; Se-yeast, 0·2; ZnSO4·7H2O, 0·5; FeSO4·7H2O, 0·6.
Obtained from Vilomix Norway AS, Norway; without cyanocobalamin, folic acid and pyridoxine hydrochloride (vitamin B6) because of the trial set up with two directions (mg/kg of diet): vitamin A, 20; vitamin D, 4; vitamin E (50 %, acetate), 200; vitamin K (50 %), 10; vitamin C (35 %, phosphate), 350; choline, 1000; ascorbic acid, 1000; thiamine hydrochloride, 15; riboflavin (80 %), 19; nicotinamide, 200; inositol, 400; calcium pantothenate, 60; biotin (2 %), 50; filler (protein blend), 6672.
Sigma-Aldrich.
Normin AS.
Dissolved in the agar solution; provided as a gift from G.O. Johnsen AS.
Provided as a gift from BASF.
Fig. 1Experimental design. Zebrafish were fed Gemma micro and Artemia nauplii as start feed from 5 and 7 d post fertilisation (DPF), respectively. The experimental feeds, control or high arachidonic acid (ARA), were given to ten replicate tanks for each feed from 27 DPF onwards. Weight and length were measured at 44 and 91 DPF. Metabolic profiling and fatty acid analysis were performed at 44 DPF.
Weight and length measures† (Mean values and standard deviations)
| Weight (mg) | Length (cm) | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | High-ARA | Control | High-ARA | |||||||||||
| DPF | Mean |
|
| Mean |
|
|
| Mean |
|
| Mean |
|
|
|
| 44 | 50·72 | 27·43 | 57 | 40·23 | 25·26 | 48 | 0·04* | 1·29 | 0·28 | 57 | 1·23 | 0·28 | 48 | 0·27 |
| 91 | 265·0 | 99·0 | 49 | 266·4 | 92·3 | 48 | 0·94 | 2·35 | 0·29 | 49 | 2·35 | 0·28 | 48 | 0·89 |
ARA, arachidonic acid; DPF, days post fertilisation.
Statistically significant: * P<0·05.
Statistical significance analysis was done by non-parametric Mann–Whitney test, except for 91 DPF (weight) which was analysed by a parametric t test with Welch’s correction. 44 DPF weight and length data and 91 DPF length data do not follow a Gaussian distribution.
n are individual fish originated from different populations (tanks) which got summarised within the feed group for subsequent statistical analysis.
Fatty acid profiles (selected) of feed and zebrafish fed for 17 d with either control or high-arachidonic acid (ARA) feed (Mean values and standard deviations)
| Zebrafish (mg fatty acid/g fish) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feed (mg fatty acid/g feed) | Control | High-ARA | |||||
| Control | High-ARA | Mean |
| Mean |
|
| |
| 18 : 1 | 43·32 | 27·24 | 18·59 | 4·14 | 12·31 | 0·35 | 0·058 |
| 18 : 2 | 31·27 | 26·80 | 10·61 | 2·13 | 8·58 | 0·21 | 0·177 |
| 18 : 3 | 17·50 | 6·43 | 4·17 | 0·88 | 1·56 | 0·06 | 0·007** |
| 18 : 4 | 0·25 | 0·25 | 0·16 | 0·05 | 0·07 | 0·01 | 0·035* |
| 20 : 3 | 0·17 | 1·79 | 0·48 | 0·1 | 0·87 | 0·02 | 0·002** |
| 20 : 4 | 1·87 | 20·66 | 1·04 | 0·16 | 5·74 | 0·13 | <0·001*** |
| 20 : 5 | 1·26 | 1·3 | 0·47 | 0·08 | 0·32 | 0·02 | 0·038* |
| 22 : 4 | 0·05 | 0·14 | 0·06 | 0·01 | 0·35 | 0·0 | <0·001*** |
| 22 : 5 | 0·05 | 0·04 | 0·09 | 0·03 | 0·56 | 0·03 | <0·001*** |
| 22 : 5 | 0·15 | 0·15 | 0·14 | 0·03 | 0·12 | 0·01 | 0·148 |
| 22 : 6 | 1·42 | 1·37 | 2·13 | 0·27 | 1·63 | 0·05 | 0·034* |
| Sum unidentified | 1·27 | 1·55 | 0·61 | 0·1 | 0·61 | 0·01 | 0·996 |
| Sum identified | 121·00 | 118·00 | 52·77 | 10·86 | 47·3 | 1·08 | 0·435 |
| Sum SFA | 17·40 | 25·20 | 10·47 | 2·12 | 11·4 | 0·26 | 0·491 |
| Sum MUFA | 49·30 | 31·90 | 22·00 | 4·81 | 15·1 | 0·44 | 0·069 |
| Sum PUFA | 54·60 | 60·50 | 20·40 | 3·93 | 20·8 | 0·46 | 0·870 |
| Sum EPA+DHA | 2·68 | 2·67 | 2·60 | 0·35 | 1·94 | 0·06 | 0·033* |
| Sum | 20·90 | 9·75 | 7·57 | 1·41 | 4·08 | 0·11 | 0·013* |
| Sum | 33·60 | 50·70 | 12·67 | 2·52 | 16·60 | 0·36 | 0·055 |
|
| 0·6 | 0·2 | 0·6 | 0·0 | 0·2 | 0·0 | |
Statistically different mean values between the control and the high-ARA group were determined using unpaired t test using GraphPad Prism. * P<0·05, ** P<0·01, *** P<0·001.
Mean is calculated for three biological replicates consisting of twenty pooled 44 DPF zebrafish/replicate.
Data are expressed as the mean of two technical replicates.
Fig. 2Metabolic profiling revealed complex changes in lipid metabolism. (a) Proportional clustering shows statistically different metabolites (n 153, P<0·05) affiliated to their main pathway. (b) Enrichment analysis revealed six significantly enriched sub-pathways. Scores underlie an enrichment of significantly different metabolites of total detected metabolites within a sub-pathway in relation to all significant metabolites to all detected metabolites. Graph shows statistically significant enriched (P<0·05) sub-pathways according to their calculated enrichment scores with indicated P values. The maximum achievable enrichment score is 3·7 (marked with max), if all detected metabolites in a sub-pathway are described as statistical significant different. For all sub-pathway enrichment scores see the online Supplementary Table S4.
Fig. 3Metabolic profiling revealed changes in PUFA synthesis. (a) Metabolites illustrated in the PUFA synthesis pathway with lipoxygenase (LOX) and cytochrome P450 (CYP)-derived eicosanoid classes. , , Statistically significant lower and higher metabolite levels in the high-arachidonic acid (ARA) group compared with the control group. Grey highlighted metabolites were not detected. (b) and (c) Box plots of normalised data expressed as scaled intensity of single n-3 and n-6 PUFA, respectively. , Control; , high-ARA; ARA, 20 : 4n-6; DHA, 22 : 6n-3; EPA, 20 : 5 n-3; n-3 DPA, 22 : 5 n-3; n-6 DPA, 22 : 5 n-6; 5-HEPE, 5-hydroxy-EPA; 5-HETE, 5-hydroxy-eicosatetraenoic acid; 12-HETE, 12-hydroxy-eicosatetraenoic acid; 5-KETE (5-oxo-ETE), 5-keto-eicosatetraenoic acid (5-oxo-eicosatetraenoic acid); 13/9-HODE, 13/9-hydroxy-octadecadienoic acid; 12,13-DiHOME, 12,13-dihydroxy-octadecenoic acid; 9,10-DiHOME, 9,10-dihydroxy-octadecenoic acid. * Significant difference (P<0·05) between feed groups (Welch’s two-sample t test).
Fig. 4Metabolic profiling revealed changes in eicosanoids derived from linoleic acid, EPA and arachidonic acid (ARA). Box plots of normalised data are expressed as the scaled intensity of single eicosanoids. 12-HETE, 12-hydroxy-eicosatetraenoic acid; 5-HETE, 5-hydroxy-eicosatetraenoic acid; 5-KETE (5-oxo-ETE), 5-keto-eicosatetraenoic acid (5-oxo-eicosatetraenoic acid); 5-HEPE, 5-hydroxy-EPA; 12,13-DiHOME, 12,13-dihydroxy-octadecenoic acid; 9,10-DiHOME, 9,10-dihydroxy-octadecenoic acid; 13/9-HODE, 13/9-hydroxy-octadecadienoic acid; , control; , high-ARA. * Significant difference (P<0·05) between feed groups (Welch’s two-sample t test).
ARA
group. In addition, ascorbate (ascorbic acid) and its oxidised derivatives like threonate and oxalate were increased in the high-ARA group. Urate levels were three times decreased and carnosine levels were 2·5 times decreased in the high-ARA group. δ-tocopherol levels were decreased, whereas α-/β-/γ-tocopherol levels were unaffected in the high-ARA group. Concurrently, pyridoxate and pyridoxamine showed lower levels in the high-ARA group, whereas pyridoxal and pyridoxamine phosphate were not different. Central metabolites related to glycolysis and gluconeogenesis (glucose-6-phosphate) and the pentose phosphate way (ribose-5-phosphate) showed lower levels in the high-ARA group. Concerning the TCA cycle, α-ketoglutarate and succinylcarnitine were significantly decreased, and malate was slightly (not significant; P<0·1) decreased in the high-ARA group.
Fig. 5High dietary arachidonic acid changed the metabolic fingerprint in zebrafish. Changes are characterised not only by a general change in lipid profiles and eicosanoids, but also by changed metabolites indicating inflammation and lipid peroxidation and changes in the antioxidant status. Arrows indicate the suggestive physiological conditions in the fish. Metabolites to which reference is made are given on the right side. 12-HETE, 12-hydroxy-eicosatetraenoic acid; 5-KETE (5-oxo-ETE), 5-keto-eicosatetraenoic acid (5-oxo-eicosatetraenoic acid); 5-HETE, 5-hydroxy-eicosatetraenoic acid; 5-HEPE, 5-hydroxy-EPA; 4-HNE-glutathione, 4-hydroxy-nonenal-glutathione.
Fig. 6High dietary arachidonic acid (ARA) affected the redox environment, characterised
by increased oxidised amino acids in zebrafish. The observed effect suggests changes
in the oxidation–reduction state, indicating oxidative stress and lipid
peroxidation. , , Statistically
significant (P<0·05) lower and higher metabolite levels in
the high-ARA group compared with the control group. ,
, Lower and higher metabolites levels,
which narrowly missed the statistical cut-off point for significance
(0·05
ARA
group.