PURPOSE: Pharmaceutical companies paid at least $3.91bn to prescribers in 2013, yet evidence indicating whether industry payments shift prescribing away from generics is limited. This study examined the association between amount of industry payments to prescribers and generic drug prescribing rates among Medicare Part D prescribers. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted among 770 095 Medicare Part D prescribers after linking the 2013 national Open Payments data with 2013 Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment data. The exposure variable was the categorized amount of total industry payments to prescribers (i.e., meals, travel, research, and ownership). The outcome was prescriber's annual generic drug prescribing rate. Multivariable generalized linear regression models were used to examine the association between the amount of industry payments and prescriber's annual generic drug prescribing rates, controlling for prescriber's demographic and practice characteristics. RESULTS: In this sample, over one-third (38.0%) of Medicare Part D prescribers received industry payments in 2013. The mean annual generic drug prescribing rate was highest among prescribers receiving no payments and lowest among those receiving more than $500 of industry payments (77.5% vs. 71.3%, respectively; p < 0.001). The receipt of industry payments was independently associated with prescribers' generic drug prescribing rate; higher payments corresponded with lower generic drug prescribing rates. Other prescriber characteristics associated with higher annual generic drug prescribing rate included male sex, non-northeast region, specialty, and patient volume. CONCLUSIONS: Receipt of industry payments was associated with a decreased rate of generic drug prescribing. How this affects patient care and total medical costs warrants further study.
PURPOSE: Pharmaceutical companies paid at least $3.91bn to prescribers in 2013, yet evidence indicating whether industry payments shift prescribing away from generics is limited. This study examined the association between amount of industry payments to prescribers and generic drug prescribing rates among Medicare Part D prescribers. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted among 770 095 Medicare Part D prescribers after linking the 2013 national Open Payments data with 2013 Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment data. The exposure variable was the categorized amount of total industry payments to prescribers (i.e., meals, travel, research, and ownership). The outcome was prescriber's annual generic drug prescribing rate. Multivariable generalized linear regression models were used to examine the association between the amount of industry payments and prescriber's annual generic drug prescribing rates, controlling for prescriber's demographic and practice characteristics. RESULTS: In this sample, over one-third (38.0%) of Medicare Part D prescribers received industry payments in 2013. The mean annual generic drug prescribing rate was highest among prescribers receiving no payments and lowest among those receiving more than $500 of industry payments (77.5% vs. 71.3%, respectively; p < 0.001). The receipt of industry payments was independently associated with prescribers' generic drug prescribing rate; higher payments corresponded with lower generic drug prescribing rates. Other prescriber characteristics associated with higher annual generic drug prescribing rate included male sex, non-northeast region, specialty, and patient volume. CONCLUSIONS: Receipt of industry payments was associated with a decreased rate of generic drug prescribing. How this affects patient care and total medical costs warrants further study.
Authors: William H Shrank; Joshua N Liberman; Michael A Fischer; Charmaine Girdish; Troyen A Brennan; Niteesh K Choudhry Journal: Ann Pharmacother Date: 2011-01-04 Impact factor: 3.154
Authors: Colette DeJong; Thomas Aguilar; Chien-Wen Tseng; Grace A Lin; W John Boscardin; R Adams Dudley Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2016-08-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: William H Shrank; Niteesh K Choudhry; Jessica Agnew-Blais; Alex D Federman; Joshua N Liberman; Jun Liu; Aaron S Kesselheim; M Alan Brookhart; Michael A Fischer Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: William H Shrank; Joshua N Liberman; Michael A Fischer; Jerry Avorn; Elaine Kilabuk; Andrew Chang; Aaron S Kesselheim; Troyen A Brennan; Niteesh K Choudhry Journal: Am J Med Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Alessandra Storino; Carolina Vigna; John C Polanco-Santana; Ernest Park; Kristen Crowell; Anne Fabrizio; Thomas E Cataldo; Evangelos Messaris Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2022-02-01 Impact factor: 3.453
Authors: Bruno Goupil; Frédéric Balusson; Florian Naudet; Maxime Esvan; Benjamin Bastian; Anthony Chapron; Pierre Frouard Journal: BMJ Date: 2019-11-05
Authors: Manvi Sharma; Aisha Vadhariya; Michael L Johnson; Zachary A Marcum; Holly M Holmes Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2018-04-02 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Harriet Ruth Feldman; Nicholas J DeVito; Jonathan Mendel; David E Carroll; Ben Goldacre Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-03-05 Impact factor: 2.692