Literature DB >> 28485061

The combined effects of temporal autocorrelation and the costs of plasticity on the evolution of plasticity.

M Siljestam1, Ö Östman1.   

Abstract

Adaptive phenotypic plasticity is an important source of intraspecific variation, and for many plastic traits, the costs or factors limiting plasticity seem cryptic. However, there are several different factors that may constrain the evolution of plasticity, but few models have considered costs and limiting factors simultaneously. Here we use a simulation model to investigate how the optimal level of plasticity in a population depends on a fixed maintenance fitness cost for plasticity or an incremental fitness cost for producing a plastic response in combination with environmental unpredictability (environmental fluctuation speed) limiting plasticity. Our model identifies two mechanisms that act, almost separately, to constrain the evolution of plasticity: (i) the fitness cost of plasticity scaled by the nonplastic environmental tolerance, and (ii) the environmental fluctuation speed scaled by the rate of phenotypic change. That is, the evolution of plasticity is constrained by the high cost of plasticity in combination with high tolerance for environmental variation, or fast environmental changes in combination with slow plastic response. Qualitatively similar results are found when maintenance and incremental fitness costs of plasticity are incorporated, although a larger degree of plasticity is selected for with an incremental cost. Our model highlights that it is important to consider direct fitness costs and phenotypic limitations in relation to nonplastic environmental tolerance and environmental fluctuations, respectively, to understand what constrains the evolution of phenotypic plasticity.
© 2017 European Society For Evolutionary Biology. Journal of Evolutionary Biology © 2017 European Society For Evolutionary Biology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptation speed; cost of plasticity; development; environmental predictability; reversible traits; strength of selection; tolerance

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28485061     DOI: 10.1111/jeb.13114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evol Biol        ISSN: 1010-061X            Impact factor:   2.411


  7 in total

1.  The lag-time constraint for behavioural plasticity.

Authors:  Ana Cristina R Gomes; Gonçalo C Cardoso
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Microbial life cycles link global modularity in regulation to mosaic evolution.

Authors:  Jordi van Gestel; Martin Ackermann; Andreas Wagner
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 15.460

3.  Transcriptomics and Fitness Data Reveal Adaptive Plasticity of Thermal Tolerance in Oysters Inhabiting Different Tidal Zones.

Authors:  Ao Li; Li Li; Wei Wang; Kai Song; Guofan Zhang
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 4.566

4.  The coevolution of lifespan and reversible plasticity.

Authors:  Irja I Ratikainen; Hanna Kokko
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  How adaptive plasticity evolves when selected against.

Authors:  Alfredo Rago; Kostas Kouvaris; Tobias Uller; Richard Watson
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  Evolution of sex allocation plasticity in a hermaphroditic flatworm genus.

Authors:  Pragya Singh; Lukas Schärer
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 2.516

7.  Environmental change and the rate of phenotypic plasticity.

Authors:  Tim Burton; Irja Ida Ratikainen; Sigurd Einum
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 13.211

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.