Literature DB >> 28484979

Difference of performance in response to disease admissions between daily time air quality indices and those derived from average and entropy functions.

Li-Wei Lai1, Wan-Li Cheng2.   

Abstract

Daily time air quality indices, which can reflect air quality in 1 day, are suitable for identifying daily exposure during conditions of poor air quality. The aim of this study is to compare the main effectiveness of four daily time indices in representing variation in the number of disease admissions. These indices include pollution standard index (PSI), air quality index (AQI) and their respective indices derived from mean and entropy functions: MEPSI and MEAQI. The hourly concentrations of fine particulate matter less than 10 μm in diameter (PM10), PM2.5, O3, CO, NO2 and SO2 from 1 January 2006 to 31 December 2010 were obtained from 14 air quality monitoring stations owned by the Environmental Protection Administration (EPA) in the Kaoping region, Taiwan.Instead of circulatory system disease admissions, the indices were correlative with the number of respiratory disease admissions with correlative coefficients of 0.49 to 0.56 (P < 0.05). The daily time air quality indices derived from mean and entropy functions improved their performance of reactive range and air pollution identification. The reactive range of MEPSI and MEAQI was 1.4-3 times that of the original indices. The MEPSI and MEAQI increased identification from 40 to 180 in index scale and revealed one to two additional categories of public health effect information. In comparison with other indices, MEAQI is more effective for application to pollution events with multiple air pollutants.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AQI derived from mean and entropy functions (MEAQI); Air quality index (AQI); Circulatory system disease admissions; PSI derived from mean and entropy functions (MEPSI); Pollutant standard index (PSI); Public health; Respiratory disease admissions

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28484979     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-9133-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  7 in total

1.  Influence of Asian dust storms on air quality in Taiwan.

Authors:  Chung-Ming Liu; Chea-Yuan Young; Yen-Chih Lee
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2006-05-03       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Comparison of the Revised Air Quality Index with the PSI and AQI indices.

Authors:  Wan-Li Cheng; Yu-Song Chen; Junfeng Zhang; T J Lyons; Joy-Lynn Pai; Shiang-Hung Chang
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 7.963

3.  CAQI Common Air Quality Index--update with PM(2.5) and sensitivity analysis.

Authors:  Sef van den Elshout; Karine Léger; Hermann Heich
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  Health effects of outdoor air pollution: approach to counseling patients using the Air Quality Health Index.

Authors:  Alan Abelsohn; Dave M Stieb
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  Characterizing multi-pollutant air pollution in China: Comparison of three air quality indices.

Authors:  Jianlin Hu; Qi Ying; Yungang Wang; Hongliang Zhang
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2015-07-18       Impact factor: 9.621

6.  Formation of an Air Pollution Index.

Authors:  Prabhat K Swamee; Aditya Tyagi
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.235

7.  The association of seasonal variations of asthma hospitalization with air pollution among children in Taiwan.

Authors:  Kuo-Wei Yeh; Chee-Jen Chang; Jing-Long Huang
Journal:  Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.310

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.