M Rockstroh1, S Franke2, M Hofer3, A Will4, M Kasparick5, B Andersen6, T Neumuth2. 1. Faculty of Medicine, Innovation Center Computer Assisted Surgery, Universität Leipzig, Semmelweisstr. 14, 04103, Leipzig, Germany. max.rockstroh@medizin.uni-leipzig.de. 2. Faculty of Medicine, Innovation Center Computer Assisted Surgery, Universität Leipzig, Semmelweisstr. 14, 04103, Leipzig, Germany. 3. Department of ENT Surgery, University Hospital of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany. 4. Center for Information Technology, Schleswig-Holstein University Hospital, Luebeck, Germany. 5. Faculty of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering Institute of Applied Microelectronics and Computer Engineering, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany. 6. Institute of Medical Informatics, Universität zu Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Clinical working environments have become very complex imposing many different tasks in diagnosis, medical treatment, and care procedures. During the German flagship project OR.NET, more than 50 partners developed technologies for an open integration of medical devices and IT systems in the operating room. The aim of the present work was to evaluate a large set of the proposed concepts from the perspectives of various stakeholders. METHOD: The demonstration OR is focused on interventions from the head and neck surgery and was developed in close cooperation with surgeons and numerous colleagues of the project partners. The demonstration OR was qualitatively evaluated including technical as well as clinical aspects. In the evaluation, a questionnaire was used to obtain feedback from hospital operators. The clinical implications were covered by structured interviews with surgeons, anesthesiologists and OR staff. RESULTS: In the present work, we qualitatively evaluate a subset of the proposed concepts from the perspectives of various stakeholders. The feedback of the clinicians indicates that there is a need for a flexible data and control integration. The hospital operators stress the need for tools to simplify risk management in openly integrated operating rooms. CONCLUSION: The implementation of openly integrated operating rooms will positively affect the surgeons, the anesthesiologists, the surgical nursing staff, as well as the technical personnel and the hospital operators. The evaluation demonstrated the need for OR integration technologies and identified the missing tools to support risk management and approval as the main barriers for future installments.
PURPOSE: Clinical working environments have become very complex imposing many different tasks in diagnosis, medical treatment, and care procedures. During the German flagship project OR.NET, more than 50 partners developed technologies for an open integration of medical devices and IT systems in the operating room. The aim of the present work was to evaluate a large set of the proposed concepts from the perspectives of various stakeholders. METHOD: The demonstration OR is focused on interventions from the head and neck surgery and was developed in close cooperation with surgeons and numerous colleagues of the project partners. The demonstration OR was qualitatively evaluated including technical as well as clinical aspects. In the evaluation, a questionnaire was used to obtain feedback from hospital operators. The clinical implications were covered by structured interviews with surgeons, anesthesiologists and OR staff. RESULTS: In the present work, we qualitatively evaluate a subset of the proposed concepts from the perspectives of various stakeholders. The feedback of the clinicians indicates that there is a need for a flexible data and control integration. The hospital operators stress the need for tools to simplify risk management in openly integrated operating rooms. CONCLUSION: The implementation of openly integrated operating rooms will positively affect the surgeons, the anesthesiologists, the surgical nursing staff, as well as the technical personnel and the hospital operators. The evaluation demonstrated the need for OR integration technologies and identified the missing tools to support risk management and approval as the main barriers for future installments.
Authors: Björn Andersen; Hannes Ulrich; Daniel Rehmann; Ann-Kristin Kock; Jan-Hinrich Wrage; Josef Ingenerf Journal: Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc Date: 2015-08
Authors: Werner Korb; Stefan Bohn; Oliver Burgert; Andreas Dietz; Stephan Jacobs; Volkmar Falk; Jürgen Meixensberger; Gero Strauss; Christos Trantakis; Heinz U Lemke Journal: Stud Health Technol Inform Date: 2006
Authors: J Bryan Sexton; Martin A Makary; Anthony R Tersigni; David Pryor; Ann Hendrich; Eric J Thomas; Christine G Holzmueller; Andrew P Knight; Yun Wu; Peter J Pronovost Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Annetje C P Guédon; Linda S G L Wauben; Marlies Overvelde; Joleen H Blok; Maarten van der Elst; Jenny Dankelman; John J van den Dobbelsteen Journal: Technol Health Care Date: 2014 Impact factor: 1.285
Authors: Caprice K Christian; Michael L Gustafson; Emilie M Roth; Thomas B Sheridan; Tejal K Gandhi; Kathleen Dwyer; Michael J Zinner; Meghan M Dierks Journal: Surgery Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Yue-Yung Hu; Alexander F Arriaga; Emilie M Roth; Sarah E Peyre; Katherine A Corso; Richard S Swanson; Robert T Osteen; Pamela Schmitt; Angela M Bader; Michael J Zinner; Caprice C Greenberg Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2012-08 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Johann Berger; Max Rockstroh; Erik Schreiber; Yukishige Yoshida; Jun Okamoto; Ken Masamune; Yoshihiro Muragaki; Thomas Neumuth Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2019-08-22 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: David Black; Michael Unger; Nele Fischer; Ron Kikinis; Horst Hahn; Thomas Neumuth; Bernhard Glaser Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2017-10-27 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Lena Maier-Hein; Matthias Eisenmann; Duygu Sarikaya; Keno März; Toby Collins; Anand Malpani; Johannes Fallert; Hubertus Feussner; Stamatia Giannarou; Pietro Mascagni; Hirenkumar Nakawala; Adrian Park; Carla Pugh; Danail Stoyanov; Swaroop S Vedula; Kevin Cleary; Gabor Fichtinger; Germain Forestier; Bernard Gibaud; Teodor Grantcharov; Makoto Hashizume; Doreen Heckmann-Nötzel; Hannes G Kenngott; Ron Kikinis; Lars Mündermann; Nassir Navab; Sinan Onogur; Tobias Roß; Raphael Sznitman; Russell H Taylor; Minu D Tizabi; Martin Wagner; Gregory D Hager; Thomas Neumuth; Nicolas Padoy; Justin Collins; Ines Gockel; Jan Goedeke; Daniel A Hashimoto; Luc Joyeux; Kyle Lam; Daniel R Leff; Amin Madani; Hani J Marcus; Ozanan Meireles; Alexander Seitel; Dogu Teber; Frank Ückert; Beat P Müller-Stich; Pierre Jannin; Stefanie Speidel Journal: Med Image Anal Date: 2021-11-18 Impact factor: 13.828