Hyun Woo Gil1, Tae Ho Lee2, In-Seok Park1. 1. Division of Marine Bioscience, College of Ocean Science and Technology, Korea Maritime and Ocean University, Busan 49112, Korea. 2. Department of Marine Bio-materials and Aquaculture, College of Fisheries Science, Pukyong National University, Busan 48513, Korea.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of cryopreservation methods for ex situ conservation of spermatozoa from far eastern catfish, Silurus asotus. The spermatozoa activity index (SAI) and hatching rates were higher in spermatozoa stored in Alserver's solution than those of spermatozoa stored in glucose solution. The SAI and hatching rates in all experimental groups gradually decreased with increasing duration of storage. Additionally, the SAI and hatching rates gradually decreased with increasing thawing temperatures at all storage durations (P<0.05). Based on the SAI and hatching rates, our results suggest that the optimal cryopreservation conditions of catfish spermatozoa involve storage in Alserver's solution with 15% ethylene glycol, and thawing at 25℃. Cryopreservation of spermatozoa is a useful and reliable technique for conserving gene resources and for artificial propagation of far eastern catfish.
The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of cryopreservation methods for ex situ conservation of spermatozoa from far eastern catfish, Silurus asotus. The spermatozoa activity index (SAI) and hatching rates were higher in spermatozoa stored in Alserver's solution than those of spermatozoa stored in glucose solution. The SAI and hatching rates in all experimental groups gradually decreased with increasing duration of storage. Additionally, the SAI and hatching rates gradually decreased with increasing thawing temperatures at all storage durations (P<0.05). Based on the SAI and hatching rates, our results suggest that the optimal cryopreservation conditions of catfish spermatozoa involve storage in Alserver's solution with 15% ethylene glycol, and thawing at 25℃. Cryopreservation of spermatozoa is a useful and reliable technique for conserving gene resources and for artificial propagation of far eastern catfish.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cryopreservation; Cryoprotectant; Diluents; Far eastern catfish; Silurus asotus
The far eastern catfishSilurus asotus is a member of the freshwater
Siluridae family. In Korea, its annual production is about 8,000 metric tons (Kim et al., 1988; Yang et al., 2015). Although the demand for this species has
increased in recent years, two factors limit the profitability of culturing far
eastern catfish. First, the growth rate shows significant sexual dimorphism because
females grow much faster than males (Kim et al.,
2001). This hinders stock management and often results in cannibalism of
young fish in farms. Second, precocious maturation before the fish reach marketable
sizes necessitates prolonged cultivation beyond sexual maturity. After reaching
sexual maturity, catfish exhibit reduced growth and decreased feeding efficiency
(Choi et al., 1992).Cryopreservation of spermatozoa could be useful for artificial propagation, which may
improve the genetic characteristics of this species. Cyropreservation techniques
have already been reported for spermatozoa from several fish species (Linhart et al., 1993; Conget et al., 1996; Linhart et
al., 2004). Cryopreserved spermatozoa may be used in research and in
aquaculture by enabling the introduction of genes from wild or native populations
into hatchery stocks if spawning times do not overlap, and increases the
availability of spermatozoa for use in selective breeding programs, especially
during seasonal shortages of males and/or females. Furthermore, cryopreserved
spermatozoa can be exchanged between countries located in both hemispheres, instead
of exchanging fish, a particular advantage when the importation of live animals is
prohibited (Conget et al., 1996). Marian & Krasznai (1987) were the first to
successfully cryopreserve spermatozoa from European catfish, S. glanis.
Their fertilization rates using frozen testicular spermatozoa were 40%-95%.
They used testicular spermatozoa for freezing, because artificially stripped
spermatozoa were polluted with urine, which activated and destroyed the
fertilization capacity within a few minutes (Linhart
et al., 1987). This problem was overcome by storing spermatozoa in
diluents, and the cryopreservation techniques were refined in later studies, in
which the optimization of the diluents extended the viability and freezing rates of
spermatozoa (Linhart et al., 1993, 2004). Cryopreservation procedures have been
successfully developed for five other catfish species: African catfish,
Clarias gariepinus; channel catfish, Ictalurus
punctatus; blue catfish, I. furcatus;
Pseudoplatystoma corruscans; and striped catfish,
Pangasius hypophthalmus, but only using testicular spermatozoa
(Steyn et al., 1985; Christensen & Tiersch, 1997; Urbanyi et al., 1999; Horvath & Urbanyi, 2000; Rurangwa et al., 2001; Carolsfeldt et
al., 2003; Kwantong & Bart,
2003; Lang et al., 2003).The aim of the present study was to optimize cryopreservation methods for ex
situ cryopreservation of spermatozoa from far eastern catfish. The
success of the cryopreservation procedure was evaluated in terms of the spermatozoa
activity index (SAI) and hatching rates of eggs fertilized with thawed cryopreserved
sperm.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
1. Experimental fish
Far eastern catfish, Silurus asotus were cultured according to
the methods of Kim et al. (2001). Mature
females were induced to spawn by a single intraperitoneal (ip) injection of
human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG; Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) administered at
1,000 IU/kg body weight (BW). Spermatozoa were obtained by incision of testes
from mature males that had also been given an ip injection of hCG at 500 IU/kg
BW. The eggs were fertilized with spermatozoa diluted in saline using the wet
method (Kim et al., 2001). The eggs were
left to fertilize for 5 min and then rinsed to remove excess spermatozoa. The
hatched fry were reared in 450 L tanks under the same conditions. The
mean±standard deviation (SD) water temperature was 24±1.5℃ and the oxygen
concentration was kept close to saturation (mean±SD: 9.4±0.3 mg/L). The
experimental fish were fed twice daily at 2% of the mean body weight throughout
the experimental period (2 years). Specimens were obtained from 2-year-old
hatchlings at a mean±SD BW and standard length of 404.1±47.36 g and 42.9±5.11
cm, respectively.
2. Diluents
On 22 April 2010, 50 fishes were randomly captured and anesthetized with 200 ppm
lidocaine-HCl/1,000 ppm NaHCO3 to remove the testes. Spermatozoa were
obtained from 8 males by incision of the surgically removed testes after an ip
injection of hCG at 1,000 IU/kg BW (Fig.
1). Spermatozoa were pooled from four fish with a spermatozoa motility
index of >80%, and were used for cryopreservation. The spermatozoa
concentration was determined using a Thoma hemocytometer (depth: 0.0025
mm2; Neubauer, Germany) under a microscope (1,000×; CH 20;
Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) and the value is expressed as the mean number of
spermatozoa in 20 squares of the Thoma cell. The diluents used in this study
were Alserver’s solution (2.05 g glucose, 0.4 g sodium chloride, and 0.8 g
sodium citrate/100 mL distilled water) and 0.3 M glucose solution (54.3 g
glucose/1,000 mL distilled water). A maximum of 8 mL of sperm was added to 40 mL
of diluent to maintain a dilution rate of 1:5 (sperm/diluent) to prevent
spontaneous initiation of spermatozoa activity (Linhart et al., 2004). After collection, the containers were stored
under aerobic conditions on ice at 0℃ for 1 hour. Sperm activity was assessed
(Table 1) and SAI was assessed under
a microscope and using video records (n = 100). SAI was
assessed as described by Strüssmann et al.
(1994).
Fig. 1
External morphology of testis of far eastern catfish, Silurus
asotus used in this experiment.
A: Testis in the inside of abdominal cavity; B: Sugically removed matured
testis. TS: testis.
Table 1
Numerical index for the evaluation of sperm motility
External morphology of testis of far eastern catfish, Silurus
asotus used in this experiment.
A: Testis in the inside of abdominal cavity; B: Sugically removed matured
testis. TS: testis.* SAI: (Score × % motile sperm)/100 (After Strüssmann et al., 1994).
3. Cryoprotectants
We compared the effect of two cryoprotectants (dimethyl sulfoxide [DMSO] and
ethylene glycol) at different concentrations and in various combinations, as
well as five different storage times. The final concentrations of DMSO and
ethylene glycol were 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20%. One milliliter of mixture was
transferred into a 1.8 mL cryotube and immediately placed in a controlled rate
cryofreezer (PLANER Kryo 10 series III; Planer, Sunbury-on-Thames, UK) that was
set at +4℃ and programmed to cool from +4 to –9℃ at a rate of 4℃/min, and from
–9 to –80℃ at a rate of 11℃/min. The temperature was then held at –80℃ for 6
min. The tube was then transferred into liquid nitrogen and stored for 1, 180,
360, 540, or 720 days. After storage for the indicated time, frozen spermatozoa
were thawed in a water bath at 15, 25, 35, or 45℃ for 90 sec.
4. Fertilization and hatching
For fertilization, 5 g of eggs (145 eggs per 1 g) was placed in a 50 mL dish.
Then, 104,000 thawed or unfrozen spermatozoa per egg were dropped onto the eggs
using a micropipette. After shaking the dish at 200 rpm with a 10 mm deflection,
5 mL of activation solution (17 mM NaCl, 5 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8) at 22℃ was added.
After 3 min, about 100 eggs were placed into a special incubator cage containing
200 mL of ultraviolet-sterilized recirculated tap water at 23℃ (9 mg/L
O2). The dead eggs were counted and removed from each cage 1 day
after fertilization and after hatching (approximately 2.5 days after
fertilization). The number of larvae in each cage was also counted. The hatching
rate (H) was calculated for each cage using the
following formula (Linhart et al.,
2005):H =
(Hl/E) ×
100where, Hl = number of hatched larvae and
E = total number of eggs placed in the
cage.To determine the proportion of immobile spermatozoa and for scanning electron
microscopy (SEM) analysis, 100 µL of stored spermatozoa, diluted 1:100 in PBS,
was placed in the center of a coverslip coated with 50 µg/mL poly-L-lysine.
Cells were left to adhere for 30 min and fixed in 1% glutaraldehyde and 1%
sucrose in PBS. They were then dehydrated in ethanol, subjected to critical
point freezing, and sprayed with gold. We observed 100 spermatozoa per group at
720 days after storage, and counted the number of normal and abnormal
spermatozoa in each group.Each experiment was repeated three times for statistical analyses. One-way
analysis of variance was used to test the statistical significance
(P<0.05) of differences among experimental groups.
Multiple comparisons were performed with Duncan’s multiple range test. SPSS
software version 12.0 was used for all analyses (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL,
USA).
RESULTS
1. Sperm acitivity index
The spermatozoa from far eastern catfish, S. asotus showed good
quality (Table 2). The quality of
spermatozoa changed depending on the treatment. The SAI was greater for
spermatozoa diluted in Alserver’s solution than for those diluted in glucose.
The SAI of spermatozoa diluted sperm in both solutions decreased with increasing
duration of storage; therefore, better results were obtained when spermatozoa
were stored for 1 hour than when stored for 24 hours (Table 2).
Table 2
Spermatozoa activity index (SAI) of far eastern catfish,
Silurus asotus dilution after 1 hour and 24 hours
cool storage in two diluents
Diluent
SAI*
Activation (1 hour)
Storage (24 hours)
Alsever's solution
1.6±0.18a
0.5±0.07b
0.3 M glucose
1.4±0.22a
0.3±0.09b
* SAI: (Score × % motile sperm)/100 (After Strüssmann et al., 1994). The
temperature of storage is 0℃. Values are means±SD. Values in same
row having the different superscripts are significantly different
(n = 100, P<0.05).
Experiments are triplicate.
* SAI: (Score × % motile sperm)/100 (After Strüssmann et al., 1994). The
temperature of storage is 0℃. Values are means±SD. Values in same
row having the different superscripts are significantly different
(n = 100, P<0.05).
Experiments are triplicate.The SAI values of far eastern catfish spermatozoa stored in two diluents and with
different concentrations of the cryoprotectants are shown in Table 3. The SAI gradually decreased with
increasing storage duration in all of the experimental groups. The SAI of
spermatozoa diluted in Alserver’s solution and DMSO gradually increased with
increasing DMSO concentration (P<0.05). The optimal
concentration of DMSO in Alserver’s solution was 20% for all storage durations.
Spermatozoa stored in 5%, 10%, or 15% DMSO were immobilized after storage for
360 days, while those stored in 20% DMSO were immobilized after 720 days. The
SAI of spermatozoa stored in Alserver’s solution and ethylene glycol gradually
increased as the ethylene glycol concentration increased from 5% to 15%, but
decreased at 20% ethylene glycol (P<0.05). The optimal
concentration of ethylene glycol in Alserver’s solution was 15% for all storage
durations. The spermatozoa were not immo bilized by storage in ethylene glycol
for any storage duration.
Table 3
Spermatozoa activity index (SAI) of far eastern catfish,
Silurus asotus in two diluents and different
concentrations of two cryoprotectants on experimental
period*
Diluent
Cryoprotectant
Concentrations(%)
SAI (Days after
storage)
1
180
360
540
720
Fresh sperm
-
-
2.0±0.15a
2.1±0.13a
2.0±0.20a
2.2±0.19a
2.0±0.18
no treatment
No treatment
0
0.1±0.01a
0
0
0
0
Alsever'ssolution
No treatment
0
0.1±0.03a
0
0
0
0
Dimethylsulfoxide(DMSO)
5
0.4±0.07a
0.2±0.04a
0
0
0
10
0.5±0.06b
0.2±0.06a
0
0
0
15
0.5±0.07a
0.3±0.03a
0
0
0
20
1.2±0.15b
0.8±0.02b
0.5±0.06a
0.3±0.01a
0
Ethyleneglycol
5
0.6±0.08a
0.4±0.05a
0.3±0.04a
0.2±0.04a
0.1±0.03a
10
0.8±0.05a
0.5±0.03a
0.4±0.07a
0.3±0.05a
0.2±0.05a
15
1.5±0.19b
1.3±0.09b
1.0±0.08b
0.8±0.09b
0.6±0.09b
20
0.7±0.03a
0.6±0.07a
0.5±0.04a
0.4±0.02a
0.3±0.04a
0.3Mglucose
No treatment
0
0
0
0
0
0
Dimethylsulfoxide(DMSO)
5
0.3±0.04a
0.1±0.02a
0
0
0
10
0.4±0.05a
0.2±0.03a
0
0
0
15
0.4±0.08a
0.2±0.02a
0
0
0
20
0.7±0.06b
0.5±0.06b
0.2±0.04a
0.1±0.03a
0
Ethyleneglycol
5
0.5±0.02a
0.3±0.02a
0.1±0.01a
0
0
10
0.6±0.04a
0.3±0.03a
0.1±0.02a
0
0
15
1.3±0.15b
0.9±0.10b
0.7±0.06b
0.5±0.05a
0.4±0.06a
20
0.8±0.07c
0.6±0.08c
0.4±0.08c
0.3±0.06a
0.2±0.04a
*SAI: (Score × % motile sperm)/100 (After Strüssmann et al., 1994). The
temperature of storage is –80℃. Mean±SD (n=100)
values are shown. Means sharing the same letter superscript on given
dates are not significantly different (P>0.05).
Experiments are triplicate.
*SAI: (Score × % motile sperm)/100 (After Strüssmann et al., 1994). The
temperature of storage is –80℃. Mean±SD (n=100)
values are shown. Means sharing the same letter superscript on given
dates are not significantly different (P>0.05).
Experiments are triplicate.
2. The effects of dilution and cryopreservation
As shown in Table 3, the effects of
dilution in glucose solution containing DMSO or ethylene glycol were similar to
those of Alserver’s solution. The SAI of spermatozoa diluted in glucose solution
and DMSO gradually increased with increasing concentration of DMSO
(P<0.05). The SAI was lower in spermatozoa diluted in
glucose solution plus DMSO than in spermatozoa diluted in Alserver’s solution
plus DMSO. The optimal concentration of DMSO in glucose solution was 20% for all
storage durations. Spermatozoa stored in 5%, 10%, and 15% DMSO were immobilized
after 360 days, while those stored in 20% DMSO were immobilized after 720 days.
The SAI of spermatozoa stored in glucose solution plus ethylene glycol gradually
increased as the ethylene glycol concentration increased from 5% to 15%, but
decreased when stored in 20% ethylene glycol (P<0.05). The
SAI of spermatozoa stored in glucose solution plus ethylene glycol was lower
than that of spermatozoa stored in Alserver’s solution plus ethylene glycol. The
optimal concentration of ethylene glycol in glucose solution was 15% for all
storage durations. Spermatozoa stored in glucose solution plus 5% or 10%
ethylene glycol were immobilized after 540 days. By contrast, spermatozoa stored
in 15% or 20% ethylene glycol were not immobilized at any storage duration.
3. Hatching rate
The trends in hatching rates were similar to those for SAI and are shown in Table 4. The hatching rate in all of the
experimental groups gradually decreased with increasing spermatozoa storage
duration. The hatching rates of spermatozoa stored in Alserver’s solution and
DMSO gradually increased with increasing concentration of DMSO
(P<0.05). At all storage durations, the hatching rate
was higher for spermatozoa stored in 20% DMSO than for those stored in other
concentrations of DMSO. None of the eggs hatched after fertilization with
spermatozoa stored in 5%, 10%, or 15% DMSO for 360 days. The hatching rates for
eggs fertilized with spermatozoa stored in Alserver’s solution and ethylene
glycol gradually increased as the ethylene glycol concentration increased from
5% to 15%, but decreased at 20% ethylene glycol (P<0.05).
The hatching rate was higher for eggs fertilized with spermatozoa stored in 15%
ethylene glycol than in other concentrations of ethylene glycol. All of the eggs
hatched after fertilization with spermatozoa stored in ethylene glycol for any
duration.
Table 4
Hatching rates of far eastern catfish, Silurus
asotus in two diluents and different concentrations of two
cryoprotectants on experimental period*
Diluent
Cryoprotectant
Concentrations(%)
Hatching rate at days
after storage (%)
1
180
360
540
720
Fresh sperm
-
-
98±1.6
97±1.5
96±1.4
97±1.5
95±1.3
no treatment
No treatment
0
0
0
0
0
0
Alsever'ssolution
No treatment
0
0
0
0
0
0
Dimethylsulfoxide(DMSO)
5
50±2.3a
7±4.7a
0
0
0
10
51±3.8a
9±3.4a
0
0
0
15
61±4.3b
8±4.1a
0
0
0
20
88±4.4c
45±2.5b
25±2.8
14±3.1
3±1.0
Ethyleneglycol
5
51±3.4a
11±4.1a
10±3.0a
9±3.2a
7±2.1a
10
58±3.6a
24±3.3b
18±3.7b
15±3.8b
10±3.0a
15
80±2.7b
60±3.1c
58±5.9c
52±4.1c
45±4.1b
20
71±3.1c
41±4.0d
38±4.1d
36±4.4d
26±3.8c
0.3Mglucose
No treatment
0
0
0
0
0
0
Dimethylsulfoxide(DMSO)
5
45±5.7a
8±5.6a
0
0
0
10
46±5.1a
8±5.1a
0
0
0
15
51±4.5b
10±4.9a
0
0
0
20
76±4.7c
35±3.8c
16±3.1
8±4.1
2±0.8
Ethyleneglycol
5
44±5.1a
9±4.9a
7±2.6a
1±0.1a
0
10
47±4.3a
19±3.5b
10±2.9a
2±0.2a
0
15
84±4.1b
51±2.5c
45±3.2b
41±3.0b
24±2.8a
20
67±5.6c
37±3.0d
28±3.3c
22±4.1c
11±2.2b
* The temperature of storage is –80℃. Mean±SD
(n=100) values are shown. Means sharing the
same letter superscript on given dates are not significantly
different (P>0.05). The hatching rate
(H) was calculated for each
cage from the number of hatched larvae
(Hl) and from the total number of
eggs placed in the cage (E) as follows:
H =
(Hl/E)
× 100 (after Linhart et al.,
2005). Experiments are triplicate.
* The temperature of storage is –80℃. Mean±SD
(n=100) values are shown. Means sharing the
same letter superscript on given dates are not significantly
different (P>0.05). The hatching rate
(H) was calculated for each
cage from the number of hatched larvae
(Hl) and from the total number of
eggs placed in the cage (E) as follows:
H =
(Hl/E)
× 100 (after Linhart et al.,
2005). Experiments are triplicate.As shown in Table 4, the hatching rates of
eggs fertilized with spermatozoa stored in glucose and DMSO gradually increased
with increasing concentration of DMSO. At all storage durations, the hatching
rate was highest for spermatozoa stored in 20% DMSO than in other concentrations
of DMSO (P<0.05). None of the eggs hatched after
fertilization with spermatozoa stored in 5%, 10%, or 15% DMSO for 360 days,
whereas all the eggs hatched after fertilization with spermatozoa stored in 20%
DMSO. The hatching rate of eggs fertilized with glucose solution and ethylene
glycol gradually increased as the ethylene glycol concentration increased from
5% to 15%, but decreased at 20% ethylene glycol (P<0.05).
The hatching rate was higher for eggs fertilized with spermatozoa stored in 15%
ethylene glycol than in other concentrations of ethylene glycol. None of the
eggs hatched after fertilization with spermatozoa stored in 5% or 10% ethylene
glycol for 720 days. By contrast, the eggs hatched after fertilized with
spermatozoa stored in 15% or 20% ethylene glycol for all of the storage
durations.
4. External morphology of spermatozoa
The morphology of spermatozoa is shown in Fig.
2. Normal morphology was defined as the presence of a head and a
flagellum (Fig. 2A, B), and the absence of
a midpiece sleeve on SEM images. Immobile spermatozoa were classified into two
types. The first type consisted of spermatozoa with a double-stranded flagellum
(type A; Fig. 2C), and these originate from
abnormal spermatogenesis before cryopreservation. In the second type, the
flagellum is cut by ice crystals or damaged during thawing (type B; Fig. 2D). Therefore, type B spermatozoa are
immobilized by external factors. The proportion of immobile spermatozoa after
storage for 720 days is shown in Table 5.
The proportions of type A spermatozoa were not significantly different among the
experimental groups. The proportion of type B spermatozoa stored in Alserver’s
solution was lower at 5% DMSO than at other concentrations of DMSO. The
proportions of type B spermatozoa were not significantly different among 10%,
15%, and 20% DMSO. The proportion of type B spermatozoa stored in Alserver’s
solution was lower at 5% ethylene glycol than at other concentrations. The
trends in the proportions of type B spermatozoa were similar between ethylene
glycol and DMSO.
Fig. 2
External morphology of far eastern catfish, Silurus
asotus spermatozoa.
A: fresh spermatozoa; B: high power view of normal spermatozoa; C:
abnormal spermatozoa having a flagellum of two strands; D: a flagellum
of inability spermatozoa cut by ice crystal or thawing process after 720
days storage. H: head; T: tail. Bars are 1 µm.
Table 5
Inability rates of far eastern catfish, Silurus asotus
at 720 days after storage in two diluents and different
concentrations of two cryoprotectants*
Diluent
Cryoprotectant
Concentrations(%)
Inability rate of
spermatozoa (%)
Type A
Type B
Fresh sperm
-
-
5.4±0.42a
9.0±0.42a
no treatment
No treatment
0
5.6±0.58a
91.2±8.96a
Alsever'ssolution
No treatment
0
5.1±0.66a
87.6±7.19a
Dimethylsulfoxide(DMSO)
5
5.3±0.61a
63.8±0.37a
10
5.6±0.78a
61.8±0.38b
15
5.7±0.91a
61.4±0.43b
20
5.1±0.64a
61.5±0.40b
Ethyleneglycol
5
5.4±0.49a
49.4±0.55a
10
5.5±0.71a
47.5±0.64b
15
5.3±0.75a
47.0±0.71b
20
5.7±0.66a
47.2±0.38b
0.3Mglucose
No treatment
0
5.8±0.59a
87.1±9.88a
Dimethylsulfoxide(DMSO)
5
5.1±0.94a
75.4±0.79a
10
5.9±0.86a
73.1±0.91b
15
5.2±0.82a
73.4±0.88b
20
5.5±0.47a
73.6±0.98b
Ethyleneglycol
5
5.7±0.55a
52.4±0.98a
10
5.2±0.76a
50.9±1.01b
15
5.9±0.82a
50.6±0.99b
20
5.1±0.92a
50.1±1.05b
* The temperature of storage is –80℃. Mean±SD
(n=100) values are shown. Means sharing the
same letter superscript on given dates are not significantly
different (P>0.05). Experiments are triplicate. For
detail external morphology, refer to Fig. 2-C (type A) and 2-D (type
B).
External morphology of far eastern catfish, Silurus
asotus spermatozoa.
A: fresh spermatozoa; B: high power view of normal spermatozoa; C:
abnormal spermatozoa having a flagellum of two strands; D: a flagellum
of inability spermatozoa cut by ice crystal or thawing process after 720
days storage. H: head; T: tail. Bars are 1 µm.* The temperature of storage is –80℃. Mean±SD
(n=100) values are shown. Means sharing the
same letter superscript on given dates are not significantly
different (P>0.05). Experiments are triplicate. For
detail external morphology, refer to Fig. 2-C (type A) and 2-D (type
B).The proportions of type B spermatozoa were similar between those stored in
glucose solution and Alserver’s solution when using DMSO. The proportions of
type B spermatozoa were also similar between the two diluents when using
ethylene glycol. However, the proportions of type B spermatozoa stored in
Alserver’s solution or glucose solution were significantly lower in ethylene
glycol than in DMSO. The proportion of immobile spermatozoa in the absence of a
cryoprotectant was not significantly different between spermatozoa stored in
Alserver’s solution or glucose solution. The proportion of immobile spermatozoa
was significantly higher when stored without a diluent or a cryoprotectant
compared with other groups. The proportion of immobile spermatozoa was lower for
fresh sperm than for the other groups.
5. Storage condition of sperm
The effects of storage duration and thawing temperature on the SAI of spermatozoa
are shown in Fig. 3. As thawing temperature
increased, SAI gradually decreased as storage increased from 1 day to 360 days.
However, SAI after storage for 540 days and 720 days increased as the thawing
temperature increased from 15 to 35℃ (P<0.05). The
spermatozoa stored for 720 days were not immobilized by thawing at 45℃. The SAI
after storage for 540 days decreased as the thawing temperature increased from
35 to 45℃ (P<0.05). The mean SAI after storage for 540 days
and thawing at 35 and 45℃ was 0.3±0.07 and 0.1± 0.07, respectively.
Fig. 3
Spermatozoa activity index of far eastern catfish, Silurus
asotus between stored periods and thawed temperatures
during this experiment.
Mean ±SD (n=100) values are shown. Means sharing the
same letter superscript on given dates are not significantly different
(P>0.05). Diluent and concentrations of
cryoprotectant using this experiment were Alsever’s solution and 15%
ethylene glycol. Experiments are triplicate.
Spermatozoa activity index of far eastern catfish, Silurus
asotus between stored periods and thawed temperatures
during this experiment.
Mean ±SD (n=100) values are shown. Means sharing the
same letter superscript on given dates are not significantly different
(P>0.05). Diluent and concentrations of
cryoprotectant using this experiment were Alsever’s solution and 15%
ethylene glycol. Experiments are triplicate.The effects of storage duration and thawing temperature on the hatching rate are
shown in Fig. 4. The hatching rates
gradually decreased with increasing thawing temperature for all storage
durations (P<0.05). The hatching rates after storage for 1
or 180 days were not significantly affected by thawing temperatures of 15-35℃.
Similarly, the hatching rates at 360, 540, and 720 days were not significantly
affected by thawing temperatures of 15-25℃. At all storage durations, the
hatching rates were higher when fertilizing eggs with spermatozoa thawed at 15
or 25℃ compared with the other thawing temperatures. Based on the SAI and
hatching rates, our results suggest that the optimal thawing temperature of far
eastern catfish spermatozoa is 25℃.
Fig. 4
Hatching rates of far eastern catfish, Silurus
asotus between thawed periods and thawed temperatures
during this experiment.
Mean±SD (n= 100) values are shown. Means sharing the
same letter superscript on given dates are not significantly different
(P>0.05). Diluent and concentrations of
cryoprotectant using this experiment were Alsever’s solution and 15%
ethylene glycol. Experiments are triplicate.
Hatching rates of far eastern catfish, Silurus
asotus between thawed periods and thawed temperatures
during this experiment.
Mean±SD (n= 100) values are shown. Means sharing the
same letter superscript on given dates are not significantly different
(P>0.05). Diluent and concentrations of
cryoprotectant using this experiment were Alsever’s solution and 15%
ethylene glycol. Experiments are triplicate.
DISCUSSION
In our study of far eastern catfish, 104,000 spermatozoa per egg were dropped onto
unfertilized eggs using a micropipette. When optimizing the freezing protocol of
cryopreserved spermatozoa, it is necessary to use a small or moderate number of
spermatozoa per egg. For European catfish, Silurus glanis,
80,00-80,000 fresh spermatozoa per egg are needed for artificial insemination, but
hatcheries frequently use 100,000-200,000 spermatozoa per egg (Linhart et al., 2004). The use of a large number of spermatozoa
per egg may mask the low viability or poor quality of thawed spermatozoa. Moreover,
it may not be practical to use large numbers of spermatozoa in artificial
propagation because male European catfish generally produce a small volume of sperm.
Therefore, it is important to minimize sperm wastage. The dilution of sperm and eggs
in water is another factor that must be adjusted. One part sperm to 25 parts water
to 25 parts eggs was optimal for artificial propagation of European catfish in a
previous study (Linhart et al., 2004).The freezing procedure applied in our study was based on cryopreservation studies of
tiger puffer, Takifugu rubripes, and European catfish, although the
procedure was also successfully applied in far eastern catfish (Chang et al., 1997; Linhart et al., 2005). The cooling procedure was similar to
that used for African catfish, Clarias gariepinus, where a
three-step program achieved better survival of thawed spermatozoa compared with a
two-step program (Steyn et al., 1993; Viveiros et al., 2001). The first step of the
freezing program involved slow cooling from +4 to –40℃ at a rate of 2-10℃/min. While
5 min, the chamber temperature was maintained to –40℃, and the samples were
immediately plunged into liquid nitrogen (from –40 to –200℃). As mentioned Steyn et al. (1993) and Viveiros et al. (2001), cooling rate of 5-11℃/min was
considered to be optimal, and hatching rate was 81.7±5.0% in cooling rate of 5℃/min.
In our study, cool rate was lower than that of previous study, however, hatching
rate was similar to that of previous study. All previous studies have reported that
the final temperature and its duration (i.e. holding period) just before plunging
the frozen sperm into liquid nitrogen are very important. During the holding period,
the temperature in the freezer remains constant, but the temperature of the freezing
sperm continues to decrease until it reaches an equilibrium with the diluent. Most
of the freezing protocols for catfish cool the spermatozoa to a low temperature
before transferring them into liquid nitrogen. For African catfish, Steyn et al. (1985) used a holding temperature
of –65℃ and Horvath & Urbanyi (2000) used
a temperature of –80℃. For European catfish, Linhart
et al. (1993) used a holding temperature of –85℃. A holding temperature
of –80℃ was used for striped catfish, Pangasius hypophthalmus, by
Kwantong & Bart (2003) and for
channel catfish, Ictalurus punctatus, by Tiersch et al. (1994) and Christensen & Tiersch (1997). Frozen spermatozoa were thawed at 40℃
in most of those studies, while we used a temperature range of 25-40℃, consistent
with earlier studies.The use of ethylene glycol as the cryoprotectant resulted in significantly greater
hatching rates and percentage of live spermatozoa compared with DMSO. To our
knowledge, no prior studies have optimized the cryoprotectant composition for
cryopreservation of catfish spermatozoa. Although many cryoprotectants have been
tested for fish spermatozoa, those most commonly used for cryoprotection of catfish
spermatozoa include DMSO, glycerol, methanol, dimethyl acetamide, ethylene glycol,
and propylene glycol (Christensen & Tiersch,
1997; Linhart et al., 2005). DMSO
was originally recommended for striped catfish, blue catfish (I.
furcatus), African catfish, and channel catfish (Guest et al., 1976; Bart et al.,
1998; Horvath & Urbanyi, 2000;
Kwantong & Bart, 2003). According to
the present results, 15% ethylene glycol is suitable for far eastern catfish. Recent
studies of African catfish and channel catfish showed greater sperm motility and
fertility of thawed sperm using methanol as a cryoprotectant (Tiersch et al., 1994; Christensen & Tiersch, 1997; Horvath
& Urbanyi, 2000).Taddei et al. (2001) reported that osmotic shock derived from high concentrations of
the cryoprotectant (15% vs. 10%) increased the proportion of abnormal spermatozoa,
as did cold shock during pre-freezing (Muchlisin
& Siti Azizah, 2009). Osmotic shock injury of freeze-thawed
spermatozoa is characterized by coiling and swelling of the distal end of the tail
(Muchlisin & Siti Azizah, 2009).
Lahnsteiner et al. (1992) reported that
the morphological changes occurred before freezing and immediately after dilution
with the cryosolution, and that the frequency of morphological changes increased
with longer time in cryosolution. For freeze-thawed spermatozoa, osmotic shock
refers to the cellular changes that occur after transferring spermatozoa from
hypertonic conditions in a cryoprotectant, such as glycerol to isotonic conditions
after thawing (Correa & Zavos, 1996).
However, abnormalities were found in cryopreserved spermatozoa as well as fresh
spermatozoa. In our study, 14.0% of fresh spermatozoa of far eastern catfish
exhibited morphological abnormalities, which was comparable with that of baung,
Mystus nemurus, for which 13.96% of spermatozoa exhibited
abnormalities (Muchlisin & Siti Azizah,
2009). We suspect that these abnormalities occurred during
spermatogenesis.The rate of thawing may be as important as the cooling rate in terms of the viability
of cryopreserved spermatozoa (Christensen &
Tiersch, 2005). In previous studies of blue catfish, the spermatozoa were
thawed as 0.5 mL samples in French straws at 40℃ for 7 sec (Lang et al., 2003), a method that was originally developed for
mammalian spermatozoa (Pickett & Berndtson,
1974). In the present study, it took 90 sec for the samples to completely
thaw at 25℃ in a water bath. It may be more convenient and economical to use tap
water rather than a water bath to thaw spermatozoa. We found that thawing at 15 or
25℃ did not affect spermatozoa mobility, but, if time is limited, 25℃ should be
considered, especially when large numbers of samples need to be processed or if
there are time constraints in the hatchery. Cryopreservation of sperm is a useful
and reliable technique for conservation of gene resources of far eastern catfish and
for artificial propagation.